Case law

Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Swinney

60 Okla. 115 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1916

Co. v. Rogers, 48 Neb. 653 , 67 N. W. 602 ; Missouri P. R. Co. v. Tipton, 61 Neb. 49 , 84 N. W. 416 ; Gilman v. Brown, 115 Wis. 1 , 91 N. W. 227 . … Co. v.

Cities Service Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.

70 O.B.A.J. 778 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1999

Boyd, 1992 OK 42 , 836 P.2d 1269 , Hammonds v. Osteopathic Hospital Founders Association, 1996 OK 54 , 917 P.2d 6 . [9] Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists, 1996 OK 41 , 913 P.2d 1339 . … Board of Governors of Registered Dentists, 1996 OK 41 , ¶ 19, ¶ 22, 913 P.2d 1339, 1345-46 . [7] See Walker v. City of Mesquite Texas, 129 F.3d 831, 832 (5th Cir.1997). [8] See, e.g., Offutt v.

Seibert v. First Nat. Bank of Okeene

25 Okla. 778 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1910

Outcalt v. Collier, 8 Okla. 473 , 58 Pac. 642 ; Gillette v. Murphy, 7 Okla. 91 , 54 Pac. 413 ; Wedd v. Gates et al., 15 Okla. 602 , 82 Pac. 808 ; Strange v. … Crismon, 22 Okla. 841 , 98 Pac. 937 ; Board of Commissioners v. Lemley, 23 Okla. 306 , 101 Pac. 109 ; Continental Gin Co. v. Huff (reported in this volume) 108 Pac. 369 .

Thompson v. Yates

184 Okla. 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1938

In Wade v. … In Hill v.

First Nat. Bank of Roff v. Good

127 Okla. 251 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1927

Under the rule announced in Pettis v. … State whether or not he boarded at your place? A. He was boarding with me sometime in 1912. By Mr. King: We object; incompetent, irrelevant, immaterial. By the Court: Overruled. By Mr. King: Exception. Q.

Rose v. First Nat. Bank of Stigler

93 Okla. 120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1923

Holmes v. Halstid, 76 Okla. 31 , 183 Pac 969 . The case of First National Bank of Mounds v. … Our own court, in Logan v.

In Re Initiative Petition No. 362 State Question 669

66 O.B.A.J. 2313 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1995

Williams Natural Gas Company v. State Board of Equalization, 891 P.2d 1219, 1222 (Okla.1994), citing Nordlinger v. Hahn, 505 U.S. 1 , 112 S.Ct. 2326 , 120 L.Ed.2d 1 (1992). … The Oregon supreme court upheld the constitutionality of Measure 5 in Savage v. Munn, 317 Or. 283, 295 , 856 P.2d 298, 304 (1993).

Hedtke v. Kukuk

93 Okla. 264 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1923

Brown, Sheriff.” … E. 269 , cited with approval by this court in Jamison v.

Tyrell v. Shaffer

70 Okla. 228 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1918

McDaniel et al. v. Holland, 230 Fed. 945 , 145 C. C. A. 139 ; Jordan v. Jordan et al., 62 Okla. 171 , 162 Pac. 758 ; Heffner v. Harmon, 60 Okla. 153 , 159 Pac. 650 ; Hart v. … West, 62 Okla. 71 , 161 Pac. 534 ; Hutchinson v. Brown, 66 Okla. 250 , 167 Pac. 624 . It is urged by the plaintiff in error in the brief filed by Messrs.

Johnson v. Johnson

279 P.2d 928 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 19, 1954

Allgeier v. Brown, 199 Ky. 672 , 251 S.W. 851 ; Stewart v. Stewart, 177 Mass. 493 , 59 N.E. 116 ; In re Whittier’s Estate, supra. The handwritten words are admittedly testamentary in character. … See Beall v.

Cuneo v. Champlin Refining Co.

178 Okla. 198 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1936

On March 26, 1931, the Gulf Production Company applied to the board of adjustment of Oklahoma City for a permit to drill upon the block. … Furthermore, it would not have been proper in that litigation which consisted of an appeal from the board of adjustment to have adjudicated a dispute over the title to property. Reinhart & Donovan Co. v.

Thomas v. Ford Motor Co.

114 Okla. 3 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1925

Southern Surety Co. v. Tabor, 88 Okla. 103 . 212 Pac. 128 : Raulerson v. State Indus. Com., 76 Okla. 8 , 183 Pac. 880 ; Wilson Lumber Co. v. Wilson, 77 Okla. 312 , 188 Pac. 666 ; Northeast Okla. Ry. Co. v. State Indus. … Com., 88 Okla. 146 , 212 Pac. 136 ; Choctaw Portland Cement Co. v. Lamb, 79 Okla. 109 . 189 Pac. 750 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Barr, 68 Okla. 193 , 173 Pac. 206 : Stephenson v. State Indus.

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Andrews

145 Okla. 93 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1930

Excise Board of Washington County, Okla., 20099. On April 9, 1929, the case of Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company v. … Excise Board of Washington County, Okla., was by this court affirmed, 136 Okla. 191 , 276 Pac. 769 .

York Manufacturing Co. v. Fields

705 P.2d 688 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1985

Armco, Inc. v. Holcomb, 694 P.2d 937 (Okl. 1985). … In the case of Loffland Brothers Equipment v.

State v. Ware

82 Okla. 130 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 31, 1921

Gen., v. … In Union Bank v.

Wathor v. Mutual Assurance Administrators, Inc.

87 P.3d 559 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 2004

In Wolf v. Prudential Ins. … Keel v. Titan Constr.

Gwinnup v. Griffins

26 Okla. 866 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1910

Kilgore v. Yarnell et al., 24 Okla. 525 , 103 Pac. 698 ; McMurtry v. Byrd et al., 23 Okla. 597 ; Doorley v. Buford & George Mfg. Co., 5 Okla. 594 ; Winfield v. Brinkman, 31 Kan. 25 ; Byington v. … Quinton, 45 Kan. 188 ; Strong v. Nat. Bank, 6 Kan. App. 753 ; Board of Co. Com’rs of Smith Co. v. Labore et al., 37 Kan. 480 ; Burdick’s New Trials and Appeals (1907), sec. 172.

O. F. Haley Co. v. State

34 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 18, 1912

Brown 6 eases 8-19-09. Wm. Moore. “ “ 2 8-19-09. “ • “ 2 “ “ 8-19-09. “ 2 casks beer. 8-19-09. “ 2 “ “ 8-20-09. “ 2 " “ 8-20-09. “ 8-23-09. Ed Potts. 2 “ “ 8-31-09. A. J. Porter. … Dec. 717 ; Graves v. Johnson, 156 Mass. 211 , 30 N. E. 818 , 15 L. R. A. 834, 32 Am. St. Rep. 446 ; Banchor v. Hansel, 47 Me. 58 ; Hanauer v. Doane, 12 Wall. 342 , 20 L. Ed. 439 ; Fisher v. Lord, 63 N.

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. ODOM

2023 OK 58 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 23, 2023

OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. … Bar Ass'n v.

Appeal of Gulf Pipe Line Co.

53 Okla. 562 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1916

This is an appeal by the Gulf Pipe Line Company from the action of the State Board of Equalization in reassessing and revaluing its property for purposes of taxation, and increasing the value thereof, taken by said board … of Equalization under identically the same facts as the assessment made against the Prairie Oil & Gas Company, as shown by the record in Prairie Oil & Gas Company v.