Case law

Thompson, Trustee v. Freeny, Co. Treas.

197 Okla. 325 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1946

In Board of Education v. … Assuming that to be a fact, we are of the opinion, and hold, that the order of annexation is void, under authority of Board of Education v. Allen, above. 2.

Ray Ex Rel. Schulte v. Williams

278 P.2d 550 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 30, 1954

Kinney, 195 Okl. 467 , 158 P.2d 1009 ; Brown v. Chaddick, 197 Okl. 515 , 172 P.2d 996 . … Eager v. Pugh, 123 Okl. 207 , 253 P. 41 ; Honeyman v. Andrew, 124 Okl. 18 , 253 P. 489 ; Hastings v. Montgomery, 142 Okl. 47 , 285 P. 89 ; Webster v. Skinner, 200 Okl. 553 , 198 P.2d 213 .

Jackson v. Orendorff

139 Okla. 82 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1929

Under the rule announced in Martin v. … This court in the case of Garrett v.

Neves v. Mills

74 Okla. 7 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1918

Brown: State who you mean by ‘we.’ if you will, please. A. Both of us were there in. the office together. “Q. Who were‘both of us’? A. Mr. Neves and myself. … The first paragraph of the syllabus of Bryan et al. v.

Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. Cheves

59 Okla. 85 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1916

Sherwood v. Titman, 55 Pa. 77, 80 . … Co. v. Brown, 75 Ark. 251 , 87 S. W. 135 ; 1 Wigmore on Ev. 15. Upon these authorities we are constrained to hold that the plaintiff waived its right, if any, to urge this exception, and therefore overrule the same.

Carter Oil Co. v. Eli

164 Okla. 273 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 22, 1932

The question presented in this case is identical with that presented in Smartt v. Board of County Commissioners (No. 7737) 67 Okla. 141 , 169 P. 1101 , L. R. A. 1918C, 313. … In Brewer v. Browning, L. R.

Harley v. Paschall

115 Okla. 294 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1926

In Kala-Inla Coal Co. v. … See Oklahoma Hospital v. Brown, 87 Okla. 46 , 208 Pac. 785 .

Chambers v. Coates

176 Okla. 416 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1936

The case of Hare v. … Providence Tool Co. v. Norris, 2 Wall. 45 , 17 L. Ed. 868 .” See, also, Whitaker v. First National Bank of Sapulpa, 56 Okla. 270 , 155 P. 1175 ; Davis v. Janeway, 55 Okla. 725 , 155 P. 241 . In the case of Glenn v.

Commerce Mining & Royalty Co. v. Fields

186 Okla. 540 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1940

Pure Oil Co. v. State Industrial Commission, 181 Okla. 176 , 72 P. 2d 779 ; Board of County Com’rs v. State Industrial Commission, 177 Okla. 645 , 61 P. 2d 730 ; Rock Island Improvement Co. v. … To the same effect see Sparkman v. Cosden Pipe Line Co., 182 Okla. 184 , 77 *541 P. 2d 21; Ottinger Co. v. Hall, 181 Okla. 284 , 73 P. 2d 463 ; Sheldon Oil Co. v. Thompson, 176 Okla. 511 , 56 P. 2d 1171 ; Magnolia Pet.

Wiggins v. Sterne

293 P.2d 603 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1955

This court in Shick v. … See Panther Oil & Gas Co. v. Brown, 170 Old. 210, 39 P.2d 150 , and cases therein cited.

Scott v. Iman

74 Okla. 13 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1918

Jennings Co. v. Dyer, 41 Okla. 468 , 139 Pac. 250 . … The next assignment of error is that the court erred in not allowing an item of credit claimed by defendant, Scott, for $133 for board due him from plaintiff and an item of $90 due Mrs.

Kennedy v. Hawkins

346 P.2d 342 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1959

In Stockton v. … See also City of Tulsa v.

Personal Loan & Finance Co. of Capitol Hill v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

437 P.2d 1015 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1968

Home-Stake-Production Co. v. Board of Equalization,. Old., 416 P.2d 917, 926 . … In Daube v.

Detrixhe v. McQuigg

316 P.2d 617 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1957

Winters Drug Co., 191 Okl. 264 , 128 P. 2d 1008 ; Maly v. Lamerton, 113 Okl. 168 , 240 P. 716 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Brooks, 57 Okl. 163 , 156 P. 362 . … Brown v. Parker, 217 Ark. 700 , 233 S.W. 2d 64 , however, is diametrically opposed to our conclusion.

United States v. Citizens Trading Co.

19 Okla. 585 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1907

King v. Thompson, 3 Okla. 644 ; Paine v. Foster, 9 Okla. 214 ; Moore v. Robbins, 96 U. S. 530 . … The improvements in this case 'being conceded to be lasting, permanent and valuable, there can be no room for doubt but that the townsite board misapplied the law to the facts; and hence the decision of the district court

Winn v. Willmott

138 Okla. 177 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1929

It therefore was presumptively valid, and conveyed the title to the property (Brown v. Harmon, 115 Okla. 277 , 242 Pac. 1047 ; Barteldes Seed Co. v. … Nickel v. Janda, supra; Fast v. Gilbert, supra; Pittsburg Coal & Mining Co. v. Wright, 122 Okla. 210 , 253 Pac. 487 . In Griffith v.

Newbern v. Farris

149 Okla. 74 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1931

Aldridge v. Anderson, 115 Okla. 131 , 240 Pac. 99 ; Mitchell v. Gafford, 73 Okla. 152 , 175 Pac. 227 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Baxter, 113 Okla. 280 , 241 Pac. 752 ; Okla. Prod. & Ref, Corp. v. … Jennings v. Brown, 20 Okla. 294 , 94 Pac. 557 .

Special Indemnity Fund v. Nipper

199 Okla. 346 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 3, 1947

The record discloses that on March 4, 1945, while sawing a board, respondent struck his hand against the board and fractured his hand back of the little finger. … It follows, therefore, that the rule announced in Special Indemnity Fund v. Farmer is controlling. See, also, to the same general effect Special Indemnity Fund v.

Wolf v. Blackwell Oil & Gas Co.

77 Okla. 81 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 6, 1920

Board of Co. Com’rs v. Grimes et al., 76 Oklahoma, 182 Pac. 897 ; People v. Cummings (Cal.) 40 Pac. 284 ; Rhone v. Loomis (Minn.) 71 N. W. 31 .

Romans v. Shannon

80 Okla. 199 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1921

In Wolf et al. v. … Citing Eaton v. Smith, 20 Pick. (Mass.) 150; Brown v. Orland, 36 Me. 376 ; Burnham v. Allen, 1 Gray (Mass.) 496 . . The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, affirmed. HARRISON, C. J., and JOHNSON.