Case law

Excise Board of Love County v. Randolph

172 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1935

City of Shawnee v. City of Tecumseh, 52 Okla. 509 , 150 P. 890 ; Carroll v. State, 80 Okla. 89 , 194 P. 219 ; Reisinger v. Hurst, 163 Okla. 92 , 20 P. (2d) 1040 ; State ex rel. Fulton v. … State Election Board et al., 168 Okla. 446 , 33 P. (2d) 800 ; State ex rel. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Walker et al., 168 Okla. 543 , 35 P. (2d) 269 .

Goodin v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, ETC.

601 P.2d 88 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1979

, in their official capacity as Board Members of said school district, Board of Education of Independent School District No. 16 of LeFlore County, Oklahoma, James Ward, Don Green, Carl Raines, Harold Brown and H.R. … School Dist. v. Fincher, 510 S.W.2d 98, 103 (Tex.Civ.App. 1974) . [7] Lowery v. Oklahoma Beverage Control Board, 584 P.2d 720, 724 (Okl. 1978) . [1] In Protest of Chicago, R.I. & P. Ry.

Modern Builders, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment

193 Okla. 141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1943

This application was filed before the board created by the ordinance of the city of Tulsa, which ordinance provides for an appeal to the district court. The board denied the application. … Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation, 188 Okla. 645 , 112 P. 2d 802 ; Sweeney v. Tulsa County Excise Board, 183 Okla. 211 , 80 P. 2d 582 .

Board of Review v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.

193 Okla. 36 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1943

“In one group of these cases of which Burgin v. Board of Review et al. … W. 303 ; Block Coal & Coke Co. et al. v. United Mine Workers et al. (1941) 177 Tenn. 247 , 148 S. W. 2d 364 , 149 S. W. 2d 469 ... ” In Knox Consol. Coal Corp. v. Review Board (Ind. A.) 43 N.

Edmonston v. Holder

203 Okla. 189 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1948

Boiler & Welding Co. et al. v. … The holding in Hassen v.

Board of Com'rs v. Remedial Finance Corp.

186 Okla. 648 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1940

The board of county commissioners will be referred to hereinafter as commissioners. … WELCH, V. C. J., and CORN, J., absent.

Breeding v. Excise Board of Oklahoma County

180 Okla. 379 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 22, 1937

In Grubb v. … And in City of Ardmore v. Excise Board of Carter Co., 155 Okla. 126 , 8 P. (2d) 2 , involving the construction of sections 12674 and 12676, O.

Lowden v. Excise Board of Texas County

185 Okla. 143 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 23, 1939

No. 49 v. Wolfe, 94 Okla. 87 , 221 P. 42 .” Section 10405 therein mentioned is the same as section 6860, above, prior to the aforesaid amendment. See, also, Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. … Excise Board, 181 Okla. 229 , 73 P.2d 173 . The question here is one pertaining entirely to ad valorem taxation and therefore of legislative concern.

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. McCulley

377 P.2d 568 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1962

In connection with the above, we are impressed with the following excerpt from Boynton v. … BLACKBIRD, V. C. J., and IRWIN, J., concur in result.

State Ex Rel. v. Board of County Com'rs

188 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 19, 1940

In Board of County Com’rs of Kay County v. … Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. v. Paulter, supra; 61 C. J. 970; Northern P. R. Co. v. Raymond, 5 Dak. 356 , 40 N. W. 538 ; Central Union Trust Co. v. Willat Film Corporation, 99 N. J. Eq. 748, 133 Atl. 780 .

Union Oil Co. v. Board of Equalization

913 P.2d 1330 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 20, 1996

They rely solely on General Motors v. Oklahoma County Board of Equalization, 678 P.2d 233 (Okla.1983). … Tharel v. Board of County Commissioners of Creek County, 107 P.2d 542, 550 (Okla.1940).

Lowden v. Excise Board of Beckham County

172 Okla. 154 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1935

Co. v. … Excise Board of Washington County, 168 Okla. 619 , 35 P. (2d) 274 , are determinative of the question on appeal, and in said stipulation it is agreed that as to item Y of the protest, involving the general fund of school

Board of Comr's Garfield v. Phillips Univ.

193 Okla. 222 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1943

In Board of County Com’rs of Woods County v. … State v.

Board of Com'rs Garvin Co. v. Pyeatt

59 Okla. 221 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1916

This is an action brought by the defendant in error against plaintiff in error, for the recovery of certain taxes paid by numerous persons, “by mistake of law,” for a refund, for which claims had been filed with the board … Cox v. Dempster Mill & Mfg. Co., 50 Okla. 703 , 150 Pac. 465 ; Turman v. Ingram, 50 Okla. 47 , 150 Pac. 684 ; Switzer Lbr. Co. v. Brazell, 50 Okla. 329 , 150 Pac. 1064 ; Dow Coal. Co. v.

Board of County Commissioners of Garfield v. Porter

19 Okla. 173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1907

The defendants in error pleaded the settlements with the county board as an estoppel. … Abel v. Blair, 3 Okla. 399 , 41 Pac. 342 ; Polson v. Pursell et al., 4 Okla. 93 , 46 Pac. 578 ; Horner v. Christy, 4 Okla. 553 , 46 Pac. 561 ; Segman v. Poole, 5 Okla. 677 , 49 Pac. 944 .

Whiteneck v. Board of Commissioners of Woods County

89 Okla. 52 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1923

This court in the case of Board of Com’rs of Pawnee county v. … In James v.

Broadwell v. Board of Com'rs of Bryan Co.

88 Okla. 147 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1922

Parker v. Board of Com’rs of Tillman Co., 41 Okla. 723 , 139 Pac. 891 . See, also, Smith v. Board of Com’rs of Garvin County, 62 Okla. 120 , 162 Pac. 463 . … See Board of Com’rs of Atoka Co. v. Cypert, 65 Okla. 168 , 166 Pac. 195 . The plaintiff, however, sought to appeal.

Herd v. the United States.

13 Okla. 512 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1904

S. v. Logan, 105 Fed. 240 . … Joe Brown and Dan Brown.

Gambulos v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

416 P.2d 959 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 26, 1966

Plaintiff contends that the enactment of such order represents an attempt by Board to fix, freeze and control, directly or by delegation, the wholesale price of liquor and cites Oliver v. … control the price of alcoholic beverages at retail (Oliver v.

Wade v. Board of Com'rs of Harmon County

161 Okla. 245 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 1932

The identical question here involved was before the court in the case of Robison v. Board of Com’rs of Marshall County, 151 Okla. 100 , 1 P. (2d) 660 . … State ex rel. v. Cease, 28 Okla. 271 , 114 P. 251 ; Threadgill v. Cross, 26 Okla. 403 . 109 P. 558 ; Wilds v. Williams (Mo.) 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1060, 133 S. W. 1 .