Case law

Harley v. Paschall

115 Okla. 294 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1926

In Kala-Inla Coal Co. v. … See Oklahoma Hospital v. Brown, 87 Okla. 46 , 208 Pac. 785 .

Tweed v. First National Bldg. Corp.

203 Okla. 31 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1950

In the case of Schaff v. … As stated in U.S. v.

Neves v. Mills

74 Okla. 7 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1918

Brown: State who you mean by ‘we.’ if you will, please. A. Both of us were there in. the office together. “Q. Who were‘both of us’? A. Mr. Neves and myself. … The first paragraph of the syllabus of Bryan et al. v.

Long v. State ex rel. Department of Highways

285 P.2d 198 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1955

The defendants rely on the case of Board of County Commissioners of Roosevelt County v. Good, 44 N.M. 495 , 105 P.2d 470 . … We think the preferable rule is that laid down in the Washington case of Armstrong v.

Greenameyer v. Coate

12 Okla. 452 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1903

The rule laid down in Rice v. West, was expressly overruled in the subsequent case of Richardson et al. v. Penny, 6 Okla. 328 , in which the court used the following language: “ That portion of the decision in Rice v. … (Citing Barto v. Abbe, 16 Ohio, 408; Brown v. Burdick, 25 Ohio St. 260 ; McAlpin v. Purse, [Ga.] 12 S.E. 412 .)

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Amend

44 Okla. 602 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1915

The county excise board (created, etc., by Session Laws 1910, p. … Co. v. Thompson, Co. Treas., 35 Okla. 138 , 128 Pac. 685 .

Winn v. Willmott

138 Okla. 177 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1929

It therefore was presumptively valid, and conveyed the title to the property (Brown v. Harmon, 115 Okla. 277 , 242 Pac. 1047 ; Barteldes Seed Co. v. … Nickel v. Janda, supra; Fast v. Gilbert, supra; Pittsburg Coal & Mining Co. v. Wright, 122 Okla. 210 , 253 Pac. 487 . In Griffith v.

Detrixhe v. McQuigg

316 P.2d 617 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1957

Winters Drug Co., 191 Okl. 264 , 128 P. 2d 1008 ; Maly v. Lamerton, 113 Okl. 168 , 240 P. 716 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Brooks, 57 Okl. 163 , 156 P. 362 . … Brown v. Parker, 217 Ark. 700 , 233 S.W. 2d 64 , however, is diametrically opposed to our conclusion.

Hammond v. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of Land Office

151 Okla. 87 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1931

This contention has been decided adversely to him in the case oi Clark v. Board of Com’rs of Cimarron County, 143 Okla. 18 , 285 Pac. 127 . … J., OLARIC, V. O. J., and RILEY, CULLISON, SWINDALL, MCNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. ANDREWS, J., absent.

Romans v. Shannon

80 Okla. 199 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1921

In Wolf et al. v. … Citing Eaton v. Smith, 20 Pick. (Mass.) 150; Brown v. Orland, 36 Me. 376 ; Burnham v. Allen, 1 Gray (Mass.) 496 . . The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, affirmed. HARRISON, C. J., and JOHNSON.

Waide v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

56 Okla. 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 29, 1916

to the proper party, but that the board of county commissioners of Garvin county claimed the same pursuant to sections 20, 21, and 22 of chapter 68 of the Session Laws of 1910, and praying that said board of county commissioners … This court, in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. De Armond, 55 Okla. 618 , 155 Pac. 592 , has held adversely to this contention of plaintiff. Section 1833, Rev.

Thomas v. Ford Motor Co.

114 Okla. 3 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1925

Southern Surety Co. v. Tabor, 88 Okla. 103 . 212 Pac. 128 : Raulerson v. State Indus. Com., 76 Okla. 8 , 183 Pac. 880 ; Wilson Lumber Co. v. Wilson, 77 Okla. 312 , 188 Pac. 666 ; Northeast Okla. Ry. Co. v. State Indus. … Com., 88 Okla. 146 , 212 Pac. 136 ; Choctaw Portland Cement Co. v. Lamb, 79 Okla. 109 . 189 Pac. 750 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Barr, 68 Okla. 193 , 173 Pac. 206 : Stephenson v. State Indus.

Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Parker

201 Okla. 193 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1949

As was said by the court in its syllabus in Steeg v. St. Paul City R. Co., 50 Minn. 149 , 52 N. … W. 393 : “The servants of a streetcar company who control the movements of its cars are bound to use due cafe in starting the same so as to allow passengers a reasonable opportunity to get safely on board, regard being had

JOHNSON v. CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE CO.

478 P.3d 422 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 2020

Neal , 2011 OK 20, n. 29 , 264 P.3d 1173, 1184 (trial court properly construed policy as a contract of adhesion); Brown v. … BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA v. LUCAS Discussed 2013 OK 24 , 301 P.3d 407 , W.R. ALLISON ENTERPRISES, INC. v. COMPSOURCE OKLAHOMA Discussed 1974 OK 147 , 534 P.2d 1293 , WILEY v.

Fields v. Fields

55 Okla. 652 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 27, 1915

Board of County Com’rs of Creek County v. State ex rel. Jones, 48 Okla. 477 , 150 Pac. 455 ; Montemat v. Johnson, 42 Okla. 443 , 141 Pac. 779 ; Oligschlager v. Grell, 13 Okla. 632 , 75 Pac. 1131 ; Stallard v. … In Jones v.

School District No. 24 of Custer Co. v. Renick

83 Okla. 158 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1921

Stockard v. … Y. 296 ; Dutten v. Hanover, 42 Ohio St. 215 ; La Londe v. Barron County, 80 Wis. 380 , 49 N. W. 960 ; Davis v. Henderson, 127 Ky. 13 , 104 S. W. 1009 . 31 Ky. Law Rep. 1252 ; Littell v.

Cuneo v. Champlin Refining Co.

178 Okla. 198 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1936

On March 26, 1931, the Gulf Production Company applied to the board of adjustment of Oklahoma City for a permit to drill upon the block. … Furthermore, it would not have been proper in that litigation which consisted of an appeal from the board of adjustment to have adjudicated a dispute over the title to property. Reinhart & Donovan Co. v.

Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge, Free & Accepted Masons of State v. Draper

208 Okla. 5 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 2, 1952

Supporting such contention plaintiffs rely upon Cherry v. Brown, 79 Okl. 215 , 192 P. 227 , 13 A.L.R. 92 ; Oklahoma Union Ry. Co. v. Dascus, 133 Okl. 83 , 271 P. 242 ; Harris v. First Nat. … See Jones v. Duncan, 168 Okl. 598 , 35 P.2d 451 ; Godfrey v. F. D. Bearley Lbr. Co., 171 Okl. 425 , 43 P.2d 478 ; Seran v. Parker, 177 Okl. 219 , 58 P.2d 581 ; Smoot v.

Lawrence v. Perlstein

102 Okla. 58 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1924

Gamble v. Riley et al., 39 Okla. 363 , 136 Pac. 390 ; Colonial Jewelry Company v. Brown, 38 Okla. 44 , 131 Pac. 1077 ; Joyce on Defenses’ to Commercial Paper, see. 312. … He also cites Benjamin v. Rogers, 126 N.

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Phelps

166 Okla. 55 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1933

Drilling Co. v. Pennington, 151 Okla. 61 , 1 P. (2d) 764 . … Geis Price Grain Co. v. Bailey, 155 Okla. 302 , 9 P. (2d) 424 .