Case law

In Re Unger

22 Okla. 755 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 1, 1908

In Brown v. … App. 605 ; Twining v. City of Elgin, 38 Ill. App. 356 ; Town of Trenton v. Clayton, 50 Mo.

Dunavant v. Evans

191 Okla. 208 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1942

See Brusha et al. v. Board of Education, 41 Okla. 595 , 139 P. 298 , L. R. A. 1916C, 233; Heckman v. Davis, 56 Okla. 483 , 155 P. 1170 (a forgery case); see note in 50 A.L.R. 780 ; 19 Am. Jur. § 65, p. 661. … In Kenney et al. v.

Kyselka v. First Nat. Bank of Pawhuska

204 Okla. 454 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1950

W. 572 ; Boughton v. Flint, 74 N. Y. 476 ; Brown v. McElroy, 52 Ind. 404 ; Emerson v. North American Transportation & Trading Co. (April 19, 1922) 303 Ill. 282 , 135 N. … (N.S.) 685, 77 Atl. 509 ; Howell v. Adams, 68 N. Y. 314 ; Pardee v. Fish, 60 N. Y. 265 ; Munger v. Albany City National Bank, 85 N. Y. 580 ; Shute v. Pacific National Bank, 136 Mass. 487 .

Farmers' State Bank of Granite v. City State Bank of Mangum

42 Okla. 207 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1914

See, also, Higgins v. Higgins, 7 Kan. App. 811, 52 Pac. 906 ; Marvel v. White, 5 Okla. 736 , 50 Pac. 87 ; Board of Com’rs of Woods County v. Oxley, 8 Okla. 502 , 58 Pac. 651 ; King v. … Horse Chief Eagle, 23 Okla. 532 , 101 Pac. 1135 ; Gwinnup et al. v. Griffins et al., 26 Okla. 866 , 113 Pac. 909 ; McMasters v. English et al., 26 Okla. 818 , 110 Pac. 1070 ; Wilson v.

Hammond v. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of Land Office

151 Okla. 87 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1931

This contention has been decided adversely to him in the case oi Clark v. Board of Com’rs of Cimarron County, 143 Okla. 18 , 285 Pac. 127 . … J., OLARIC, V. O. J., and RILEY, CULLISON, SWINDALL, MCNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. ANDREWS, J., absent.

Tweed v. First National Bldg. Corp.

203 Okla. 31 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1950

In the case of Schaff v. … As stated in U.S. v.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Herndon

74 Okla. 203 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1919

In the petition it is alleged that the excise board in and for Seminole county did review the estimate submitted to it by the board of county commissioners of said county for current expenses for said county for the fiscal … It is apparent 'that the opinion of this court in No. 7320, Dusk et al. v. White.

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MIDDLETON

2018 OK 7 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 2018

Board of County Commissioners , 1950 OK 105 , 217 P.2d 827 . The disqualified nominee appealed and asked this Court to retain this appeal. … Board of County Commissioners , 1950 OK 105 , 217 P.2d 827 .

Gilbert Central Corp. v. State

716 P.2d 654 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 27, 1986

Cartwright v. … In the case of Board of Regents v.

Benton v. Ortenberger

371 P.2d 715 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1962

Fitch, 22 Okl. 475 , 99 P. 1089 , 23 L.R.A.,N.S., 573; First National Bank of McCloud v. City National Bank of Wellington, Tex., 71 Okl. 52 , 175 P. 253 ; George W. Brown & Sons State Bank v. … Sanky v. Suggs, supra. In the case of Davis v.

Dill v. Johnston

72 Okla. 149 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1919

The Supreme Court of Illinois, in the case of Brown et al. v. De Young et al., 167 Ill. 549 , 47 N. … Brown v. DeYoung, 167 Ill. 549 , 47 N. E. 863, 866 ; Eaton v. Robinson, 19 R. I. 146, 31 Atl. 1058 , 32 Atl. 339 , 29 L. R. A. 100; Fougeray v. Cord, 50 N. J. Eq. 185, 198-200, 24 Atl. 499 ; Davis v.

Fidelity Laboratories, Inc. v. Oklahoma City

190 Okla. 488 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1942

The permit was refused by the building superintendent and an appeal was prosecuted to the board of adjustment, where the permit was also refused. … Kenyon v. Edmundson, 80 Okla. 3 , 193 P. 739 ; Jordan v. Nesmith, 132 Okla. 26 , 269 P. 1096 ; Key v. State, 101 Okla. 211 , 224 P. 549 ; Gragg v. State, 73 Okla. 132 , 175 P. 201 . See 20 R. C.

Alva State Bank and Trust Co. v. Dayton

755 P.2d 635 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 26, 1988

As elsewhere, “government authority” in this act, § 2202(c), means: “... any agency, board, commission or department of the State of Oklahoma, or any officer, employee, representative, or agent thereof.” … See also, Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co., 457 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 2744 , 73 L.Ed.2d 482 (1982); Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337 , 89 S.Ct. 1820 , 23 L.Ed.2d 349 (1969).

Kiowa Lbr. Co. v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co.

185 Okla. 641 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1939

Our foregoing conclusion is supported, inferentially, by the decision in Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Larkins, 168 *644 Okla. 69, 31 P.2d 608 . … Why the board or the court denied his petitions we do not know.

Thomas v. Noel

107 Okla. 94 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 1924

This court held in the case of Wenner, County Treas., v. Board of Education of the City of Perry, 25 Okla. 515 , 106 Pac. 821 , that the service of copy of writ of mandamus is not sufficient and the service is void.

James v. Wingate

179 Okla. 224 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1937

First State Bank of Loco v. Lucas (1934) 168 Okla. 406 , 33 P. (2d) 622 . In the case of Preston v. … Brown v. Bookstaver (Ill., 1892) 31 N. E. 17 ; Frink v. LeRoy (Cal. 1874) 49 Cal. 314 ; Adams v. Holden (Iowa, 1900) 82 N. W. 468 : Buss v. Kemp Lumber Co. (N. M., 1918) 170 P. 54 .

Boyd v. Wiggins

7 Okla. 85 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1898

In Thomas v. Gay, 169 U. S. 283 , 18 Sup. … This court, in Sweet v.

Commerce Mining & Royalty Co. v. Fields

186 Okla. 540 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1940

Pure Oil Co. v. State Industrial Commission, 181 Okla. 176 , 72 P. 2d 779 ; Board of County Com’rs v. State Industrial Commission, 177 Okla. 645 , 61 P. 2d 730 ; Rock Island Improvement Co. v. … To the same effect see Sparkman v. Cosden Pipe Line Co., 182 Okla. 184 , 77 *541 P. 2d 21; Ottinger Co. v. Hall, 181 Okla. 284 , 73 P. 2d 463 ; Sheldon Oil Co. v. Thompson, 176 Okla. 511 , 56 P. 2d 1171 ; Magnolia Pet.

Chapman v. Thompson

288 P.2d 720 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 20, 1955

In Hays v. … Hays v. Bonaparte, supra, 129 Okl. 258 , 264 P. 605 .

School District No. 24 of Custer Co. v. Renick

83 Okla. 158 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1921

Stockard v. … Y. 296 ; Dutten v. Hanover, 42 Ohio St. 215 ; La Londe v. Barron County, 80 Wis. 380 , 49 N. W. 960 ; Davis v. Henderson, 127 Ky. 13 , 104 S. W. 1009 . 31 Ky. Law Rep. 1252 ; Littell v.