Case law

Hutchings v. Winsor

92 Okla. 37 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1923

In Sinclair v. … Smith, Adm., 20 Kan. 83 ; Sarbach v. Sarbach, 86 Kan. 894 , 122 Pac. 1052 ; McKean et al. v. Massey, Adm’x, 9 Kan. 600 . In Coblentz v.

Bumgarner v. Pruitt

421 P.2d 651 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1966

In Christ’s Methodist Church v. … J., JACKSON, V. C. J., and BERRY and HODGES, JJ., dissent.

Daube v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

310 P.2d 768 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1957

The Board of Tax Appeals held in Grison Oil Corp. v. … The Board of Tax Appeals cites a number of cases in support of its decision. The Supreme Court of Utah in New Park Mining Co. v.

Ruggles v. Montgomery

107 Okla. 89 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1924

It appears that upon the face of the returns certified to the county election board by the precinct boards, the defendant, Rug-gles, had received a majority of the votes and was entitled to such certificate of nomination. … See Jarman v. Mason, decided Sept. 16, 1924, 102 Okla. 278 , 229 Pac. 459 .

Perma-Stone Oklahoma City Co. v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

278 P.2d 543 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1954

Plaintiff filed its application for refund of said contributions with what is designated as the Assessment Board of the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission. … Williams v.

Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Boles

30 Okla. 764 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1912

In the case of Wilmoth v. … W. 209 ; New Jersey Traction Co. v. Gardner, 60 N. J. Law, 571, 38 Atl. 669 ; Crissey v. Hestonville, etc., Ry. Co., 75 Pa. 83 ; Brown v. Seattle City R. Co., 16 Wash. 465 , 47 Pac. 890 ; Conley v. Forty-Second St. R.

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Andrews

145 Okla. 93 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1930

Excise Board of Washington County, Okla., No. 20099. On April 9, 1929, the case of Missouri, Kansas Texas Railway Company v. … Excise Board of Washington County, Okla., was by this court affirmed. 136 Okla. 191 , 276 P. 769 .

Rider v. Bob Hiner Service Station

321 P.2d 378 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1958

In Dillon v. … In Mobley v.

Crandall v. Cousins

104 Okla. 139 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1924

In Nation v. … Brennan v. Roach, 47 Mo. App 200; Wright v. Brown, 68 Mo.

Treese v. Ferguson

120 Okla. 235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1925

In Adams et al. v. … taxes.’ ” In Gibson v.

Wilson v. Fallin

262 P.3d 741 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 1, 2011

Mary Fallin, the Governor of Oklahoma; 3 Kris Steele, the Speaker of the Oklahoma House of Representatives; Brian Bingman, President Pro Tempore of the Oklahoma Senate; and Paul Ziriax, Secretary of the Oklahoma Election Board … V, Okla.

Dunavant v. Evans

191 Okla. 208 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1942

See Brusha et al. v. Board of Education, 41 Okla. 595 , 139 P. 298 , L. R. A. 1916C, 233; Heckman v. Davis, 56 Okla. 483 , 155 P. 1170 (a forgery case); see note in 50 A.L.R. 780 ; 19 Am. Jur. § 65, p. 661. … In Kenney et al. v.

Bonicamp v. Starbuck

25 Okla. 483 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1910

Ringer v. Holtzclaw, 112 Mo. 519, 20 S. W. 800. Dayton v. Stone, 111 Mich. 196 , 69 N. W. 515 ; Bumpus v. Bumpus, 53 Mich. 346 , 19 N. W. 29 ; Wardell v. Williams, 62 Mich. 50 , 28 N. W. 796 , 4 Am. St. … Penn, 1 Maule & S. 21, Goss v. Lord Nugent, 5 Barn & Ad. 67, Harvey v. Grabham, 5 Ad. & E. 61, Stead v. Dawber, 10 Ad. & E. 57, and Marshall v.

Gwinnup v. Griffins

26 Okla. 866 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1910

Kilgore v. Yarnell et al., 24 Okla. 525 , 103 Pac. 698 ; McMurtry v. Byrd et al., 23 Okla. 597 ; Doorley v. Buford & George Mfg. Co., 5 Okla. 594 ; Winfield v. Brinkman, 31 Kan. 25 ; Byington v. … Quinton, 45 Kan. 188 ; Strong v. Nat. Bank, 6 Kan. App. 753 ; Board of Co. Com’rs of Smith Co. v. Labore et al., 37 Kan. 480 ; Burdick’s New Trials and Appeals (1907), sec. 172.

Joy v. Kizziar

169 Okla. 642 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1934

In the case of Brown v. Oregon Short Line R. Co. … Codman v. Evans, 1 Allen, 443 ; Motley v. Sargent, 119 Mass. 231 -235.

State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. Freeman

440 P.2d 744 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 1968

4, the creation of an agricultural board is another, the authorization of the creation of the banking board is another, each being either specifically created by the Constitution, or its creation expressly authorized by … United States v. Aluminum Co. of America, supra; see also Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S. 1, 110, 111 , 81 S.Ct. 1357, 1417, 1418 , 6 L.Ed.2d 625, 689 .

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Armstrong

30 Okla. 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1911

In Commonwealth v. … In Decker v. Atchison, etc., Ry.

Hames v. Roberts

68 O.B.A.J. 1861 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 20, 1997

See LCR, Inc. v. Linwood Properties, 918 P.2d 1388 (Okla.1996); Ingram v. Oneok, Inc., 775 P.2d 810, 812 (Okla.1989); Wimberly v. Buford, 660 P.2d 1050 (Okla.1983); Matney v. … Wade v. Brown, 516 P.2d 526, 529 (Okla.1973). .

Stinchcomb v. Harris

192 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1943

Co. v. Galloway, 183 Okla. 432 , 83 P. 2d 174 . Therefore, as said in Bleecker v. … Maine v. Edmonds, 58 Okla. 645 , 160 P. 483 . In Meads v.

Kiniry v. Davis

82 Okla. 211 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1921

Haven v. Trammell, Sheriff, et al., 79 Okla. 309 , 193 Pac. 631 ; Corrugated Culvert Co. v. Simpson Twp., 51 Okla. 178 , 151 Pac. 854 ; Dixon v. State Mut. Ins. Co., 60 Okla. 238 , 159 Pac. 922 ; Cressler v. … Brown et al., 79 Okla. 170 , 192 Pac. 417 .