Case law

Scrivner v. McClelland

67 Okla. 51 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1917

Border et al. v. Carrabine, 24 Okla. 609 , 104 Pac. 906 . … Deal v. Thompson, 51 Okla. 256 , 151 Pac. 856 . This also is the general rule. 3 Cyc. 521; Walden v. McKinnon, 157 Ala. 291 , 47 South. 874 , 22 L. R. A. (N. S.) 716.

Webb v. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co.

74 Okla. 223 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1919

Co. v. Baker, 21 Okla. 51 , 95 Pac. 433 , 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 825; Clark v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co., 24 Okla. 764 , 108 Pac. 361 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Martin, 42 Okla. 353 , 141 Pac. 276 ; Missouri, O. & G. … Co. v. Parker, 50 Okla. 491 , 151 Pac. 325 .

Brady v. Interstate Mort. Trust Co.

96 Okla. 293 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 1924

Brown v. Bass (U. S.) 18 L. Ed. 330 : Kilgour v. Scott, 101 Fed. 359 : Friend v. Yahr 126 Wis. 291 ; Callahan v. Mercantile Trust Co., 188 Mass. 393 , 74 N. E. 666 : Prescott v. Brooks (N. D.) 94 N. W. 88 : Loomer v. … Costa v. Davies (Ark.) 46 Am. Dec. 311 ; Brabazan v. Seymour, 42 Conn. 553 ; Morrison v. Smith 81 Ill. 221 : McMurray v. Taylor (Mo.) 77 Am. Dec. 611 ; Holmes v. De Camp (N. Y.) Am. Dec. 293.

Cook v. McCord

13 Okla. 506 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1904

This court held in Woodruff v. Wallace, 3 Okla. 355 , and Calhoun v. … (McDaid v. Oklahoma, 150 U. S. 218 ; Bockfinger v. Foster, 62 Pac. 799 .)

McDougald v. Incorporated Town of Broken Bow

71 Okla. 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1918

In State v.. Murphy, 23 Nev. 390 [Pac. 628], following State v. … “In State ex rel. v.

Mid-Central Towing Co. v. National Bank of Tulsa

348 P.2d 327 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 1, 1959

See First National Bank of Durant v. School District # 4, Bryan County, 31 Okl. 139 , 120 P. 614 , 39 L.R.A.,N.S., 655; Young v. Hembree, 181 Okl. 202 , 73 P.2d 393 ; Brown v. … See Magna Oil & Refining Co. v. Cameron Refining Co., Ill Okl. 89, 238 P. 413 ; Home Development Co. v. Hankins, 195 Okl. 632 , 159 P.2d 1013 ; McGrath v. Eichhoff, 187 Okl. 64 , 100 P.2d 880 ; and Gillespie v.

McConnell v. Wallace

92 Okla. 174 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 29, 1923

Another case in point is the case of Ford v. Brown COal.) 52 Pac. 817 . In this case the plaintiff brought an action to recover commissions upon a sale of real estate made by a broker. … Cox, 41 Okla. 672 . 139 Pac. 953 , and Woodworth et al v. Franklin, 85 Okla. 27 , 204 Pac. 452 .

Casey v. Casey

73 O.B.A.J. 2577 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 24, 2002

Our decisions in Kaiser v. Kaiser, 2001 OK 30, ¶ 33 , 23 P.3d 278 and Abbott v. … Brown, representing the father, providing in pertinent part at p. 22: "... MR. BROWN: I'm saying she can do what she wants to without prejudice through his four weeks of visitation this summer.

Kansas City Bridge Co. v. Gravitt

188 Okla. 30 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1940

Co. v. … Co. v.

In Re Abrams' Will

182 Okla. 215 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1938

A. 1917C, 479; Montague v. State (1930 N. D.) 231 N. W. 728 ; Heffner v. Heffner (1896 La.) 20 So. 281 . . In the case of Montague v. State (1930 N. … J. 721, 998; In re McMahon’s Estate (Cal. 1917) 163 P. 669 ; Bingel v. Volz (1892) 142 Ill. 214 , 34 A. S. R. 64; Waller v. Waller (Va. 1845) 42 Am. Dec. 564 ; Heffner v. Heffner, supra.

George R. Barse Live Stock Commission Co. v. McKinster

10 Okla. 708 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1901

Justice Hunt, in City of Memphis v. Brown, 20 Wall. 304 , wherein he said: * * * “This consideration can have no legitimate influence. … In so far as the law as herein stated is inconsistent with the rule announced in Wade v. Gould, 8 Okla. 690 , that case is modified to conform to the views herein expressed.

Cooke v. Sinopoulo

194 Okla. 352 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1944

Thompson v. Norwood, 189 Okla. 360 , 117 P. 2d 791 ; Gripe v. Grieves, 188 Okla. 565 , 111 P. 2d 818 ; Carpenter v. Buellesfeld, 187 Okla. 213 , 102 P. 2d 119 ; Oklahoma City-Ada-Atoka R. Co. v. … Browne v. Bassett, 191 Okla. 22 , 126 P. 2d 705 ; Shreve v. Cornell, 182 Okla. 193 , 77 P. 2d 1 .

Smith v. Hines

261 P.3d 1129 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 7, 2011

Smith (Smith/patient), a field officer with the Oklahoma City Police Department, sought the care of the defendant/appellee, board-certified orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Robert Hines (Dr. … In Qualls v. U.S.

First Nat. Bank of Taloga v. Farmers' State Guaranty Bank of Thomas

62 Okla. 30 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 1916

Co. v. … E. 479 ; Nehring v. Kicker, 126 Ill. App. 262 ; State v. Gregory, 31 S. D. 425, 141 N. W. 365 ; State v. Lamothe, 37 La. Ann. 43 ; Johnson v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.) 65 S. W. 485 ; Merc. Co. v.

Chambers v. Coates

176 Okla. 416 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1936

The case of Hare v. … Providence Tool Co. v. Norris, 2 Wall. 45 , 17 L. Ed. 868 .” See, also, Whitaker v. First National Bank of Sapulpa, 56 Okla. 270 , 155 P. 1175 ; Davis v. Janeway, 55 Okla. 725 , 155 P. 241 . In the case of Glenn v.

Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. State

35 Okla. 463 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1913

Co. v. State, 28 Okla. 476 , 114 Pac. 721 . Such there is not. … Co. et al. v. State, 27 Okla. 820 , 117 Pac. 330 : “Courts are not permitted to disregard the uncontradicted evidence of competent, unimpeached witnesses.

Banning v. Peru-Laclede Syndicate, Inc.

179 Okla. 382 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1937

Cook, 79 Okla. 280 , 193 P. 36 ; Brown v. Sinclair Ref. Co., 86 Okla. 143 , 206 P. 1042 ; Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. Hulsey, 132 Ala. 444 , 31 So. 532 ; Trowbridge v. Wilson & Co., 102 Kan. 521 , 170 P. 816 . … Co. v.

Queen Ins. Co. of America v. Baker

174 Okla. 273 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1935

This court held in the ease of Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Co. v. … Reed v. Fichencord, 96 Okla. 3 , 219 P. 937 , is a ease in point upon this question.

Burns v. Harder

129 Okla. 11 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1928

Co. v. Burgess, 21 Okla. 653 , 97 Pac. 27 . … Culbertson v. Mann, 30 Okla. 249 , 120 Pac. 918.

Rhodes v. Arthur

19 Okla. 520 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1907

As sustaining this rule, see Gee v. McMillan, 14 Ore 268, 12 Pac. 417 ; Tobey v. McAllister, 9 Wis. 463 ; Brown v. Byam et al., 65 Iowa, 374 ; Huff v. Olmstead, 67 Iowa, 598 ; Bokes v. Gilbert, 93 Ind. 70 ; Gilbert v. … Bokes et al., 106 Ind. 558 ; Fouch et al. v. Wilson, 60 Ind. 64 ; Williamson v. Worten (Ind.) 31 N E. 791; Graham v. Moffett et al. (Mich.) 78 N. W. 132 ; McDole v. Purdy, 23 Iowa, 277 ; Yoemans v. Bell, 29 N. Y.