Case law

Scrivner v. McClelland

67 Okla. 51 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1917

Border et al. v. Carrabine, 24 Okla. 609 , 104 Pac. 906 . … Deal v. Thompson, 51 Okla. 256 , 151 Pac. 856 . This also is the general rule. 3 Cyc. 521; Walden v. McKinnon, 157 Ala. 291 , 47 South. 874 , 22 L. R. A. (N. S.) 716.

Webb v. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co.

74 Okla. 223 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1919

Co. v. Baker, 21 Okla. 51 , 95 Pac. 433 , 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 825; Clark v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co., 24 Okla. 764 , 108 Pac. 361 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Martin, 42 Okla. 353 , 141 Pac. 276 ; Missouri, O. & G. … Co. v. Parker, 50 Okla. 491 , 151 Pac. 325 .

Cottrell v. Livergood

82 Okla. 301 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1921

It was further agreed that the plaintiff furnish all the threshing crew and teams and board for the crew to complete tbe threshing. … Rogers Lumber Co. v. M. W.

Alexander v. Von Wedel

169 Okla. 341 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1934

Booth & Flinn, Ltd., v. Cook et al., 79 Okla. 280 , 193 P. 36 ; Brown v. Sinclair Refining Co., 86 Okla. 143 , 206 P. 1042 ; Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Watts, 148 Okla. 28 , 296 P. 977 ; Barnsdall Refining Co. v. … Co. v. Watts, supra; New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Rinehart & Donovan, 124 Okla. 227 , 255 P. 587 ; Markley v. White et al., 168 Okla. 244 , 32 P. (2d) 716 .

Yocham v. Horn

201 Okla. 647 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1948

A writ of prohibition was issued out of this court to prohibit the exercise of jurisdiction by the election board. Yocham v. County Election Board, 198 Okla. 588 , 180 P. 2d 831 . … Weber v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 421 , 195 P. 510 .

Brady v. Interstate Mort. Trust Co.

96 Okla. 293 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 1924

Brown v. Bass (U. S.) 18 L. Ed. 330 : Kilgour v. Scott, 101 Fed. 359 : Friend v. Yahr 126 Wis. 291 ; Callahan v. Mercantile Trust Co., 188 Mass. 393 , 74 N. E. 666 : Prescott v. Brooks (N. D.) 94 N. W. 88 : Loomer v. … Costa v. Davies (Ark.) 46 Am. Dec. 311 ; Brabazan v. Seymour, 42 Conn. 553 ; Morrison v. Smith 81 Ill. 221 : McMurray v. Taylor (Mo.) 77 Am. Dec. 611 ; Holmes v. De Camp (N. Y.) Am. Dec. 293.

Cook v. McCord

13 Okla. 506 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1904

This court held in Woodruff v. Wallace, 3 Okla. 355 , and Calhoun v. … (McDaid v. Oklahoma, 150 U. S. 218 ; Bockfinger v. Foster, 62 Pac. 799 .)

Rector v. State

495 P.2d 826 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1972

*827 The leading; case involving the first question raised here is Jack v. … The second question was adequately covered in the case of Newman v. State ex rel. Board of Regents, 490 P.2d 1079 (1971).

Adams v. City of Anadarko

198 Okla. 484 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1947

It is shown that he was required to work immediately in front of the grandstand; which was 300 feet long and about 20 feet high; that the race track was partially inclosed with a board fence about seven feet high which prevented … Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. King. 109 Okla. 213 , 235 P. 522 ; Bartlett-Collins Glass Mfg. Co. v. Brotherton, 145 Okla. 284 , 292 P. 822 ; Corzine v. Traders Compress, 196 Okla. 259 , 164 P. 2d 625 .

Town of Boswell v. Trabold

561 P.2d 1365 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 22, 1977

Mobley v. Brown et al., 151 Okl. 167 , 2 P.2d 1034 , 83 A.L.R. 1014 . … Cooper v. Okla. City, Okl., 361 P.2d 483 ; Bd. of Ed. Ind. S.D. No. 1 v. Wright, Okl., 460 P.2d 422 ; Teaney v. State Industrial Court, Okl., 458 P.2d 151 ; Rhoton v. City of Norman, Okl., 466 P.2d 948 ; Richey v. Okla.

McConnell v. Wallace

92 Okla. 174 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 29, 1923

Another case in point is the case of Ford v. Brown COal.) 52 Pac. 817 . In this case the plaintiff brought an action to recover commissions upon a sale of real estate made by a broker. … Cox, 41 Okla. 672 . 139 Pac. 953 , and Woodworth et al v. Franklin, 85 Okla. 27 , 204 Pac. 452 .

Kansas City Bridge Co. v. Gravitt

188 Okla. 30 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1940

Co. v. … Co. v.

George R. Barse Live Stock Commission Co. v. McKinster

10 Okla. 708 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1901

Justice Hunt, in City of Memphis v. Brown, 20 Wall. 304 , wherein he said: * * * “This consideration can have no legitimate influence. … In so far as the law as herein stated is inconsistent with the rule announced in Wade v. Gould, 8 Okla. 690 , that case is modified to conform to the views herein expressed.

First Nat. Bank of Wetumka v. Nolen

59 Okla. 20 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1916

Co. v. … . & Development Co. v. Ellison, 42 Colo. 498 , 94 Pac. 303 ; Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Brown, 39 Okla. 245 , 134 Pac. 850 ; Humphrey v. Morgan, 30 Okla. 343 . 120 Pac. 577 ; Best v. Rocky Mountain Nat.

Cooke v. Sinopoulo

194 Okla. 352 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1944

Thompson v. Norwood, 189 Okla. 360 , 117 P. 2d 791 ; Gripe v. Grieves, 188 Okla. 565 , 111 P. 2d 818 ; Carpenter v. Buellesfeld, 187 Okla. 213 , 102 P. 2d 119 ; Oklahoma City-Ada-Atoka R. Co. v. … Browne v. Bassett, 191 Okla. 22 , 126 P. 2d 705 ; Shreve v. Cornell, 182 Okla. 193 , 77 P. 2d 1 .

Smith v. Hines

261 P.3d 1129 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 7, 2011

Smith (Smith/patient), a field officer with the Oklahoma City Police Department, sought the care of the defendant/appellee, board-certified orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Robert Hines (Dr. … In Qualls v. U.S.

TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLC

373 P.3d 1057 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 1, 2016

In the 1951 case of Board of Regents v. … Board of Regents v. Updegraff, 237 P.2d at 137 . The Court relied on this language in Gilbert Cent. Corp. v. State, 1986 OK 6 , 716 P.2d 654, 659 . . Wieman v.

Chambers v. Coates

176 Okla. 416 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1936

The case of Hare v. … Providence Tool Co. v. Norris, 2 Wall. 45 , 17 L. Ed. 868 .” See, also, Whitaker v. First National Bank of Sapulpa, 56 Okla. 270 , 155 P. 1175 ; Davis v. Janeway, 55 Okla. 725 , 155 P. 241 . In the case of Glenn v.

In Re Abrams' Will

182 Okla. 215 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1938

A. 1917C, 479; Montague v. State (1930 N. D.) 231 N. W. 728 ; Heffner v. Heffner (1896 La.) 20 So. 281 . . In the case of Montague v. State (1930 N. … J. 721, 998; In re McMahon’s Estate (Cal. 1917) 163 P. 669 ; Bingel v. Volz (1892) 142 Ill. 214 , 34 A. S. R. 64; Waller v. Waller (Va. 1845) 42 Am. Dec. 564 ; Heffner v. Heffner, supra.

Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. State

35 Okla. 463 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1913

Co. v. State, 28 Okla. 476 , 114 Pac. 721 . Such there is not. … Co. et al. v. State, 27 Okla. 820 , 117 Pac. 330 : “Courts are not permitted to disregard the uncontradicted evidence of competent, unimpeached witnesses.