Case law

Bramble v. Caywood

193 Okla. 668 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1944

Davis v. Fariss, 180 Okla. 125 , 68 P. 2d 417 ; Chamberlain et al. v. Davis, 191 Okla. 457 , 130 P. 2d 848 . We are not unmindful of the holding of this court in Pimm v. … In Koehn et al. v.

Deming Inv. Co. v. Baird

32 Okla. 393 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1912

In the case of Mansur-Tebbetts Implement Co. v. George R. … This rule was followed in the case of Haynes v. Brown, 18 Okla. 389 , 89 Pac. 1124 ; also in Haier v. McDonald, 21 Okla. 470, 96 Pac. 654 .

Hurst v. Stowers

399 P.2d 477 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1965

See Johnson v. Johnson, supra, and Norman v. Smedley, Old., 363 P.2d 839 . … In Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v.

OWENS v. OWENS

2023 OK 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 2023

City of Tulsa v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension and Retirement System , 1963 OK 267 387 P.2d 255 Nelson v. … Ex Parte Haley , 1949 OK 218 210 P.2d 653 Atchley v. Board of Barber Examiners of State , 1953 OK 146 257 P.2d 302 Compsource Mut . Ins . v. State ex rel . Okla . Tax Comm'n , 2018 OK 54 435 P.3d 90 Suldbur y v.

Roring v. Hoggard Ex Rel. Hoggard

326 P.2d 812 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 20, 1958

Elias v. Midwest Marble & Tile Co., Okl., 302 P.2d 126 , and Wilson & Co., Inc., v. … Bowles v. Brown, 187 Okl. 264 , 102 P.2d 837 . The instruction given by the court correctly stated the measure of damage. Finally, it is urged that the damages awarded are excessive.

Probert v. Kibby

87 Okla. 198 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1922

In the case of Brown v. Minshall, 83 Okla. 98 , 202 Pac. 1037 . … Vann v.

Carlton v. Boardman Co.

115 Okla. 151 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 3, 1925

Carlton, as county clerk of Kiowa county, to compel the said defendant to attest a warrant ordered issued by the board of county commissioners of Kiowa county. … DeAtley v. Alexander, 77 Okla. 87 , 186 Pac. *152 1080, and the same declaration oí law there made.

Mothersead v. Wiley

114 Okla. 105 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1926

Mangold v. Utterback, 54 Okla. 655 , 160 Pac. 713 ; Collins v. Waide, 70 Okla. 191 , 173 Pac. 835 ; State v. Emery, 73 Okla. 36 , 174 Pac. 770 ; McKone v. McConkey, 77 Okla. 3 , 185 Pac. 520 . … Turner v. Turner, 106 Okla. 261 , 233 Pac. 1057 ; Brown v. Privette, 109 Okla. 1 , 234 Pac. 577 ; Johnston v. Key, 110 Okla. 19 , 235 Pac. 211 ; Simpson v. Schaff, 110 Okla. 90 , 236 Pac. 384 .

Finley v. Exchange Trust Co.

183 Okla. 167 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1938

In Avery v. Union Trust Company of N. Y. (N. Y.) 114 N. … In Prudential Trust Co. v. McCarter (Mass.) 171 N.

Garb v. Mnnick

100 Okla. 109 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 1924

J. 595, section 615; Brown v. Coppedge 54 Okla. 88 , 153 P. 817 ; Levin v. Cook. 84 Okla. 55 , 202 P. 299 . 3. … Heindselman v. Harper, 91 Okla. 50 , 215 P. 771 , a recent Oklahoma case; Rose v.

Boorigie v. Boorigie

130 Okla. 131 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 27, 1928

Brown as to defendant Mitchell, and the further showing that Patrick, defendant, was also sick, show that these parties to the suit were unable to attend and were considered by defendants as material witnesses. … This case cites with approval the following cases: Title Guaranty & Trust Co. v. Turnbull, 40 Okla. 294 , 137 Pac. 1178 ; Harn v. Interstate Building & Loan Co., 68 Okla. 227 , 172 Pac. 1081 ; City of Ardmore v.

In Re Sooner Oil & Gas Co.'s Complaint

168 Okla. 467 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1934

It will be seen from the foregoing statement of facts, when compared with the facts in the case of Pure Oil Pipe Line Co. v. … It is further contended that the entire pipe line involved in the instant case is located in one county, whereas in the case of Pure Oil Pipe Line Co. v.

Thomas v. Jones

143 Okla. 23 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1930

Brown v. Minshall, 83 Okla. 98 , 202 Pac. 1037 . … Tiger v. Brown, 130 Okla. 83 , 265 Pac. 124 .

Eckerle v. Ferris

175 Okla. 107 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1935

In Moore v. … Laws 1935, c. 50, art. 2, pages 211 to 212; and by the following additional citations of this court: Allen v. Board of Commissioners of Logan County, 131 Okla. 41 , 267 P. 860 ; Leininger v. H. L.

Dennis v. City of Chickasha

66 O.B.A.J. 2313 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1995

Certiorari is granted for the limited purpose of overruling the Court of Appeals’ decisions in Hart v. Board of County Commissioners, 842 P.2d 777 (Okla.Ct.App.1992) and Patterson v.

American Soda Fountain Co. v. Gerrer's Bakery

14 Okla. 258 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 1, 1904

In Bell v. … To the same effect is Mason v. Decker, 72 N. Y. 595 ; Quick v. Wheeler, 78 N. Y. 300 ; Brewer v. Ford, 7 N. Y. Supp. 244 , 126 N. Y. 643 ; Bridgford v. Crocker, 60 N. Y. 627 ; Brown v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 44 N.

In Re Initiative Petition No. 2, Town of Skiatook

205 Okla. 160 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1951

This court held in North et al. v. … ” (Brazell v. Zeigler, 26 Okla. 826 , 110 P. 1052 .)

Gaines v. Gaines

207 Okla. 619 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1952

Bateman, 191 Okla. 272 , 129 P. 2d 188 ; Wolverine Oil Co. v. Parks, 79 Okla. 318 , 193 P. 624 ; Brown v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 382 , 132 P. 359 ; Pearson v. Yoder, 39 Okla. 105 , 134 P. 421 ; Evans v. State, 5 Okla. … In O’Neal v.

Brockhaus v. Baysinger, County Treasurer

34 Okla. 483 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 20, 1912

Durham, 10 Okla. 361 , 61 Pac. 1096 , and Alva State Bank v. … St. sec. 5990), notice need not be given to the individuals, and that the board may raise the assessment of an individual. Both of these cases were cited with approval in Anderson v.

Ake v. General Grain Co.

181 Okla. 117 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1937

Slater v. Breese, 36 Mich. 77 ; Atwater v. Schenck, 9 Wis. 160 ; Mecklem v. Blake, 19 Wis. 397 ; Kaase v. Johnston, 5 Ind. T. 76 , 82 S. W. 680 ; Union Nat. Bank of Oshkosh v. Oium, Sheriff (N. D.) 54 N. … Brown, 193 N.