Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.01s
Tishomingo Electric Light & Power Co. v. Gullett
52 Okla. 180 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 2, 1915
In Robinson v. … Brown, 27 Okla. 217 , 111 Pac. 391 ; Fulsom Morris, etc., Co. v. Mitchell, 37 Okla. 575 , 132 Pac. 1103 . We therefore recommend that the 'judgment be affirmed. By the Court: It is so ordered.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. Iven
206 Okla. 377 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1952
Insurance Co. v. T. M. Richardson, 11 Okla. 585 , 69 P. 938 , and Brown v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co., 52 Okla. 392 , 193 P. 173 . … McBride v. Bridges, supra; Gaines v. Union Central Life Ins. Co., 191 Okla. 246 , 129 P. 2d 79 ; Mitchell v. Jackson, 177 Okla. 441 , 60 P. 2d 390 ; Aero Exploration Co. v. Hunt, 205 Okla. 152 , 236 P. 2d 239 .
Cited 2 timesPublished192 Okla. 216 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1943
In Dow v. … Browning et al., 177 Okla. 446 , 60 P. 2d 619 ; Ritchie v. Keeney, 181 Okla. 207 , 73 P. 2d 397 ; and Washburn et al. v. Culbertson et al., 181 Okla. 476 , 75 P. 2d 190 .
Cited 5 timesPublished100 Okla. 109 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 1924
J. 595, section 615; Brown v. Coppedge 54 Okla. 88 , 153 P. 817 ; Levin v. Cook. 84 Okla. 55 , 202 P. 299 . 3. … Heindselman v. Harper, 91 Okla. 50 , 215 P. 771 , a recent Oklahoma case; Rose v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEgbert v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.
50 Okla. 623 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 10, 1915
Opinion by BROWN, C. This is the second time" that this cause has been before this court." … C.), 79 Fed. 820 ; Blake v. Miller, 118 Ill. 500 , 8 N. E. 828 ; Ladd et al. v. Couzins, 35 Mo. 513 ; Baggs v. Smith, 53 Cal. 88 ; Shay v. Chicago Clock Co.; 111 Cal. 549 , 44 Pac. 237 ; Baker v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedGleason v. Wood, County Treasurer
28 Okla. 502 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1911
Two other cases similar to the foregoing are those of Tucker et al. v. Ferguson et al., 22 Wall. 527, 22 L. Ed. 805 , and West Wisconsin Ry. Co. v. Board of Supervisors, etc., 3 Otto, 595 , 23 L. Ed. 814 . … Co. v. Board of Supervisors, etc., supra: “We hold the conclusion we have announced to be the law of this case. With its ethics we have nothing to do.
Cited 12 timesPublishedState ex rel. Choctaw County District Attorney v. Anderson
749 P.2d 542 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1988
In Trotter v. … Workman v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedMarten v. Credit Adjustment Service, Inc.
378 P.2d 336 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1963
See Marten v. Credit Adjustment Ser. Inc., Okl., 349 P.2d 742 ; Maxia v. Okla *338 homa Portland Cement Co., 74 Okl. 31 , 176 P. 907 ; and Okmulgee Producing & Refining Co. v. Brown, 109 Okl. 215 , 235 P. 546 . … In Polk v.
Cited 1 timesPublished199 Okla. 156 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1947
In Handley v. … Hilton v. Oliver, 204 Cal. 535 , 269 P. 425 , 61 A.L.R. 297 ; Guild v. Brown (Cal. App.) 1 P. 2d 528 ; Ellis v. Southern Ry. Co., 72 S.C. 465 , 52 S.E. 228 , 2 L.R.A. (N.S.) 378; Thurman v. Pittsburg & M.
Cited 9 timesPublished62 O.B.A.J. 2013 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1991
States v. … State v. Oakes, 281 P.2d 749, 753 (Okla.1955). See also, Board of Comm’rs v. Alexander, 58 Okl. 128 , 159 P. 311, 315 (1916).
Cited 50 timesPublishedOklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Slocum
159 Okla. 245 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 6, 1932
Brown, chief engineer, testified that upon his inquiry Slocum said in reference to his disability — “Well I am honest, as I really do not know where and when and how it happened” (R. 84). Dr. John W. … CLARK, V. O. X, and SWINDADL, J., absent. Note.—See under (1) annotation in L. R. A. 1916A. 266: L. R. A. 1917D. 186; 28 R. C. L. 812. 828, 829; R. C. L. Perm. Supp. p. 6254: R. C. L.
Cited 5 timesPublished26 Okla. 159 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1910
Under the authority of the case of Board of County Com'rs of Pottawatomie County v. Grace, 23 Okla. 35 , 99 Pac. 653 , and Joiner v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOKLAHOMA CTY. UTIL. SERV. AUTH. v. Corporation Comm'n
519 P.2d 919 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 22, 1974
Dobbs v. Board of County Commissioners, 208 Okl. 514 , 257 P.2d 802 . … Haas v. Holloman, Okl., 327 P.2d 655 . In Lowden v.
Cited 1 timesPublished163 Okla. 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1933
The case of Ferguson v. Stephenson-Brown Lbr. … Sharum v. Sharum, 82 Okla. 266 , 200 P. 176 ; Biedleman v. Barry, 104 Okla. 288 , 231 P. 276 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedTownsend v. Creekmore-Rooney Company
332 P.2d 35 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1958
Howard v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co., 197 Okl. 269 , 169 P.2d 737 ; Russell v. Freeman, 202 Okl. 421 , 214 P.2d 443 ; Brewer v. Baker, Okl., 283 P.2d 203 . … Brown v. Shafer, Okl., 325 P.2d 743 .
Cited 21 timesPublishedHenry Building Company v. Cowman
363 P.2d 208 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1961
Cowman, plaintiff v. C. … Co. et al. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedNational Bank of Tulsa v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
380 P.2d 542 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 19, 1963
Such interest as Han-ner had was only contingent and was defeated by his death prior to his arriving at the age of sixty-one years and while still in the employment of the Brown & Williamson corporation.” … Price v. Mahoney, 175 Okl. 355 , 53 P.2d 257 . Order of the Tax Commission vacated. HALLEY, V. C. J., and DAVISON, JACKSON and BERRY, JJ., concur. BLACKBIRD, C. J., and WILLIAMS and IRWIN, JJ., dissent.
Cited 6 timesPublished185 Okla. 275 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 23, 1939
S. 1931, service may be obtained upon a corporation as follows: “A summons against a corporation may be served upon the president, mayor, chairman of the board of directors, or trustees, or other chief officer, or upon an … In support of this contention, Garland v. Frazier, 177 Okla. 493 , 61 P.2d 188 , and other similar cases, are cited. They do not support the contention that such statements were wholly incompetent.
Cited 5 timesPublishedKNOX v. OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC CO.
2024 OK 37 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 2024
For example, in Brown v. Prime Const. … POWELL Discussed 2003 OK 103 , 81 P.3d 662 , TULSA COUNTY BUDGET BOARD v. TULSA COUNTY EXCISE BOARD Discussed 2004 OK 58 , 95 P.3d 1076 , DUNCAN v. OKLAHOMA DEPT.
Cited 6 timesPublished84 Okla. 225 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1921
Hurst v. Sawyer, 2 Okla. 470 , 37 Pac. 817 ; Jennings v. Brown, 20 Okla. 294 , 94 Pac. 557 ; Shaffer v. Turner, 43 Okla. 744 , 144 Pac. 366 ; Linan v. Beck, 51 Okla. 727 , 152 Pac. 344 ; Aldridge v. … The court in the case of DeBergere v.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna