Case law

Boston v. Buchanan

75 O.B.A.J. 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 23, 2003

Wright v. Grove Sun Newspaper Co., Inc., 1994 OK 37 , 873 P.2d 983, 987 ; Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 1992 OK 72 , 833 P.2d 1218, 1225-26 . . … Board of Law Library Trustees of Oklahoma County, State of Okl. v. State ex rel. Petuskey, 1991 OK 122, ¶ 10 , 825 P.2d 1285, 1289 . .

In re the Oklahoma Boll Weevil Eradication Organization

70 O.B.A.J. 292 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1999

of Estimate v. … Ball v.

Quinn v. City of Tulsa

777 P.2d 1331 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 18, 1989

V. … City of Page, 148 Ariz. 151 , 713 P.2d 813, 826-27 (App.1986). 22 . 609 P.2d 733, 745 (Okl. 1980). 23 .Board of Regents v.

City of Wagoner v. Gibson

32 Okla. 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1912

Board of Com’rs v. Porter et al., 19 Okla. 173 , 92 Pac. 152 ; Devault et al. v. Merchants’ Exchange Bank, 22 Okla. 624 , 98 Pac. 342 ; Bettis v. Cargile et al., 23 Okla. 301 , 100 Pac. 436 ; Ellis v. … Co. v. Cummings et al., 23 Okla. 126 , 99 Pac. 654 ; McCoy v. McCoy et al., 27 Okla. 371 , 112 Pac. 1040 ; Maddox v. Drake, 27 Okla. 418 , 112 Pac. 969 ; Willson v. Willson, 27 *16 Okla. 419, 112 Pac. 970 ; Arnold v.

Mike v. Bank of Commerce of Okmulgee

71 Okla. 190 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1918

In Walker et al. v. Brown, 43 Okla. 144 , 141 Pac. 681 , this court had under consideration an act of our state Legislature, section 8841 Rev. … Childers v. Childers, 62 Okla. 130 , 163 Pac. 948 ; Roth v. Union National Bank, 58 Okla. 604 , 160 Pac. 515 ; Western Investment Co. v.

Nichols & Co. v. Thomas

51 Okla. 212 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1915

Koyer v. Willmon, 150 Cal. 785 , 90 Pac. 135 ; Llewelyn v. Levi, 157 Cal. 31 , 106 Pac. 219 . … et al. v.

Paulsen v. Western Electric Co.

67 Okla. 309 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1918

Cleveland et al. v. Lampkin et al., 65 Okla. 159 , 165 Pac. 159 ; Witherspoon v. Smith et al., 61 Okla. 26 , 160 Pac. 57 ; Millus et ux. v. Lowrey Bros., 63 Okla. 261 , 164 Pac. 663 ; Keenan v. … Co. v. Hill, 17 N. M. 347, 128 Pac. 62 ; Lucas v. Board of Commissioners of Ford County, 67 Kan. 418 , 73 Pac. 56 ; Willoughby v. Summers, 62 Okla. 98 , 162 Pac. 206 .

Fairlawn Cemetery Ass'n v. First Presbyterian Church, U. S. A. of Oklahoma City

496 P.2d 1185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1972

Brown v. Donnelly, 9 Okl. 32 , 59 P. 975 (1900). In Bradley v. … Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Polk, 185 Okl. 222 , 90 P.2d 1076 (1939).

Bowles v. Neely, Mayor

28 Okla. 556 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 1911

Newman, V. C. Phillips, O. L. Shannon, and V. B. Hayes, members thereof, M. A. Waits, treasurer, W. … Board, etc., 72 Cal. 519 , 14 Pac. 137 , and Winn v. Shaw, 25 Pac. 244 . But. the court in the latter case (Winn v.

IN RE: AMENDMENT TO OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT RULE 1.301, FORM 5 PETITION IN ERROR

2023 OK 94 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 2023

(Specify Corporation Commission, Insurance Department, Tax Commission, Court of Tax Review, Banking Board or Banking Commissioner, etc. _________________________) _____ Interlocutory Order Appealable by Right. _____ Other … _____Yes _____No V.

Keller v. Hawk

19 Okla. 407 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1907

To the same effect are the following cases: Coulter v. Stafford (circuit court of appeals for the Ninth circuit), 56 Fed. 564 ; Moore v. Brown, 11 Howard (U. S.) 414; Daniels v. Case et al., 45 Fed. 843 , 159 U. … S. 251 ; Callahan v. Davis (Mo.) 2 S. W. 216 ; Land and River Imp. Co. v. Bardon, 45 Fed. 706 ; Shoat v. Walker, 6 Kan. 65 ; Sapp v. Morrill, 8 Kan. 677 ; Hubbard v. Johnson, 9 Kan. 632 .

Buck v. J. M. McEntee & Sons

275 P.2d 984 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1954

Howard v. Brown, 1-72 Old. 308, 44 P.2d 959 . Defendant’s main contention is that the judgment is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law. … In Leckie v.

Johnston & Larimer D. G. Co. v. Helf

178 Okla. 527 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1936

supra, while plaintiff had suit pending against the principal maker and sureties on a note, the maker sold his mercantile business under the Bulk Sales Law,, control of the fund derived therefrom being given to one Addison Brown … Plaintiff retained and cashed the draft, crediting same on the note sued on, but returned the new note to-Brown, informing him ' that it intended to proceed with its suit on the old note for the balance due.

Scott v. Jordan

55 Okla. 708 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1916

See, also, Gate City Abstract Co. v. Post, 55 Neb. 742 , 76 N. W. 471 ; Goldberg et al. v. Sisseton Loan & Title Co., 24 S. D. 49, 123 N. W. 266 , 140 Am. St. Rep. 755 ; Brown v. Sims, 22 Ind. App. 317 , 53 N. … Laws 1910; Patterson et al. v. M., K. & T. Ry. Co., 24 Okla. 747 , 104 Pac. 31 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Bankers’ Natl. Bank, 32 Okla. 290 , 122 Pac. 499 ; Zeno v. Bazzell et al., 41 Okla. 574 , 139 Pac. 281 .

Pioneer Tel. Tel. Co. v. Davis, Admr.

28 Okla. 783 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1911

Numerous cases are cited in support of the text, among them Reed v. … Brown, Trustee, etc., v. Roscoe S.

James v. Southwestern Insurance Company

354 P.2d 408 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1960

See Champlin Refining Co. v. LeForce, 176 Okl. 48 , 54 P.2d 190, 194 ; Brown v. Meier & Frank Co., 160 Or. 608 , 86 P.2d 79 ; Mudge v. State, Ct.Cl., 45 N.Y.S.2d 896 ; Schultz v. … I refer specifically to Buellesfeld v. Jones, 187 Okl. 596 , 105 P.2d 242 ; Davis v. Curry, 192 Okl. 32 , 133 P.2d 186 , and Duck v. Selected Investment Corporation, 196 Okl. 547 , 167 P.2d 54 .

Clark v. Bank of Hennessey

14 Okla. 572 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 3, 1904

(Small v. Douthitt, 1 Dassler, 317; Jackson v. Latta, 15 Kan. 216 ; Aydelotte et al. v. Brittan at al., 29 Kan. 98 ). … , to be approved by them and held by such custodian as the board may designate.”

ELLISON v. CAMPBELL

326 P.3d 68 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 2014

West v. Board of County Comm'rs of Pawnee County, see note 19, infra. See also, Johnson v. Hillcrest Health Center, Inc., note 19, infra. 3 . Transcript of Proceedings, February 9, 2010, Michael D. … Perry Memorial Hosp., 1995 OK 10 , ¶ 33, 903 P.2d 263 ; Boxberger v. Martin, 1976 OK 78, ¶ 14 , 552 P.2d 370 . 19 . West v. Board of County Comm'rs of Pawnee County, 2011 OK 104, ¶ 20 , 273 P.3d 31 .

Garland v. Frazier

177 Okla. 493 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1936

. *495 This court,.in the case of Oklahoma Automobile Co. v. … See Chickasha Cotton Oil Co v. Lamb, 28 Okla. 275 , 114 P. 333 ; R. P. Smith Sons & Co. v. Raines D. G. Co., 37 Okla. 39 , 130 P. 133 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Brown, 3 Kan. App. 260 , 45 P. 118 ; Sloan v.

Taylor v. Granger

70 Okla. 267 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 23, 1918

S. v. Noble, 237 U. S. 74 , 35 Sup. Ct. 532, 59 L. Ed. 844 ; Rierdon v. Smith. 62 Okla. 48 , 101 Pac. 798 ; Brown v. Van Pelt. 64 Okla. 109 , 166 Pac. 102 . This cause is affirmed. By the Court: It is* so ordered.