Case law

Protest of Texas Pipe Line Co.

143 Okla. 177 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 20, 1930

This contention was determined by this court in Coggeshall & Co. v. … Board of County Commissioners, 53 Okla. 65 , 155 Pac. 215 ), and being valid at the time it was entered into, is not affected by subsequent conditions. City of Woodward v.

Watkins v. Howard

64 Okla. 166 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 10, 1917

Marcy v. Board of Com’rs of Seminole County, 45 Okla. 1 , 144 Pac. 611 . The same is true of land allotted in the Ohoctaw and Chickasaw Nations. … Tiger v. Western Investment Co., 221 U. S. 286 , 31 Sup. Ct. 578, 55 L. Ed. 738 . It follows, under the rule announced in Marcy v.

Independent School Dist. No. 48 v. Union Graded School Dist. No. 7

195 Okla. 104 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1945

Under the foregoing statement of facts it is apparent that our decision in Board of Education of Burbank Independent School District No. 20, a Municipal Corporation of Osage County, v. T. E.

LEE v. BUENO

381 P.3d 736 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 2016

Helderman v. Wright , 2006 OK 86, n. 15 , 152 P.3d 855 ; Brown v. Ford , 1995 OK 101, ¶10 , 905 P.2d 223 (overruled on other grounds by Smith v. … Discussed 1967 OK 41 , 424 P.2d 69 , STEIGER v. CITY NATIONAL BANK OF TULSA Discussed 1995 OK 101 , 905 P.2d 223 , 66 OBJ 3044, Brown v. Ford Discussed 2003 OK 115 , 82 P.3d 1021 , BLYTHE v.

State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Waters

376 P.2d 288 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1962

Plaintiff cites the cases of Epperson v. Johnson, 190 Okl. 1 , 119 P.2d 818 ; Board of Com’rs of Pontotoc County v. Rayburn, 192 Okl. 624 , 138 P.2d 820 ; and Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. … In both Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. Dye, supra, and Board of County Com’rs of Pontotoc County v.

State ex rel. Williamson v. Commissioners of Land Office of the State

301 P.2d 655 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1956

No. 23 of Okfuskee v. Commissioners of the Land Office, 166 Okl. 226 , 27 P.2d 149 ; Board of Commissioners of Woods County v. State ex rel. Com’rs of Land Office, 125 Okl. 287 , 257 P. 778 , 53 A.L.R. 1128 . … We are cited the case of Coyle v.

Bond v. Krugg

115 Okla. 222 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1925

Roberts, 28 Okla. 619 , 115 Pac. 771 ; Lindly v. Kelly, 47 Okla. 328 , 147 Pac. 1016 ; Grantz v. Jenkins, 73 Okla. 205 , 175 Pac. 527 ; Bank of Venice v. Clapp (Cal.) 121 Pac. 298 ; Brown v. Cow Creek Sheep Co. … (Wyo.) 126 Pac. 886 ; Patterson v. Oakes (Iowa) 14 A. L. R. 559; Usher v. Tucker, 217 Mass. 441 , L. R. A. 1916F, 826. The judgment is affirmed. By the Court: It is so ordered. Note. — See under (1) 27 C.

Rorem v. Bodine

178 Okla. 235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 1936

Howard v. Arkansas et ux., 59 Okla. 206 , 158 P. 437 ; Hill v. McCleary, 141 Okla. 205 , 284 P. 646 ; Jones & Spicer v. Advance-Rumley Co., 157 Okla. 67 , 10 P. (2d) 724 . … Manes v. Hoss, 28 Okla. 489 , 114 P. 698 ; Doorley v. Buford & George Mfg. Co., 5 Okla. 594 , 49 P. 936 ; McDonnell v. Continental Supply Co., 79 Okla. 286 , 193 P. 524 ; Clapper v.

Richardson v. Gregg

144 Okla. 102 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1930

The duty of the election board in case a voter is chal-' lenged is prescribed in section 10341, C. O. … (See, also, Burns v. Lackey [Ky.] 186 S. W. 909 .) The Supreme Court of Colorado in Neelley v.

McClellan v. Minor

19 Okla. 104 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 4, 1907

Frame v. Ryel, 14 Okla. 536 , 79 Pac. 97 ; Board of Washita County v. Hubble, 8 Okla. 169 , 56 Pac. 1058 ; Sawyer Lumber Co. v. Champlin Lumber Co., 16 Okla. 90 , 84 Pac. 1093 ; B. K. & S. W. Ry. Co. v. … Grimes, 38 Kan. 241 , 16 Pac. 472 ; Ryan v. Madden, 46 Kan. 376 , 26 Pac. 680 ; Pelton v. Bauer (Colo.) 35 Pac. 918 ; Eddy v: Weaver, 37 Kan. 540 , 15 Pac. 492 ; Hill v. Bank, 42 Kan. 364 , 22 Pac. 324 .

Everts v. Town of Bixby

24 Okla. 176 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1909

In the case of Hodges et al. v. … Smith et al. v. Allen, 31 Ark. 270 ; McGhee v. Carroll & Jones, 31 Ark. 550 ; Hughes v. Wheat, 32 Ark. 392 . In the case of Brown et al v. Gorman, 7 Ind. T. 747 , 104 S.

Twine v. Kilgore

3 Okla. 640 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1895

(Hinds v. Driver, 100 Ind. 315 ; Fever v. Johnson, 79 Ind. 554 ; Harper v. State, ex rel. Adams, 101 Ind. 109 ; Penn. R. R. Co. v. Nations, 111 Ind. 203 .) … (Allen v. Bond, 112 Ind. 523 ; Hamm v. Romine, 98 Ind. 77 .)

Cassity v. Pitts

63 O.B.A.J. 2929 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1992

Kay Pharmacal Co. v. Dalious Const. Co., Id. Those representing the Roy M. … Kay Pharmacal Co. v.. Dalious Const. Co., Id. Finally, Cassity claims he is entitled to reformation of the settlement agreement because, among other reasons, the Roy M.

Burke v. Smith

57 Okla. 196 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1916

Among many cases asserting this doctrine are Winston v. Browning, 61 Ala. 80 ; Green v. Taylor, Fed. Cas. No. 5761; Hyde v. Phillips, 61 Wash. 314 , 112 Pac. 257 ; Britt v. … Brown, 31 Okla. 213 , 120 Pac. 950 ; Coombs v. Cook, 35 Okla. 326 , 129 Pac. 698 ), and, if we deny this right to parties, we ought not to assume it ourselves.

Home Builders Lumber Co. v. White

75 Okla. 294 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1919

This court in the case of Haskell v. … Citing 2 Cyc. 656; City of Lawton v. Ayres, 40 Okla. 524 , 139 Pac. 963 ; Barnes v. Lynch, 9 Okla. 11 , 59 Pac. 995 ; Elliott v. Orton, 69 Oklahoma, 171 Pac. 1110 .

Spaniard v. Tantom

131 Okla. 75 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 20, 1928

To sustain the judgment, counsel cite Walker v. Brown, 43 Okla. 144 , 141 Pac. 681 ; Wilson v. Greer, 56 Okla. 387 , 151 Pac. 629 . … Riley v. Collier, 111 Okla. 136 , 238 Pac. 491 ; Courtney v. Daniel, 124 Okla. 46 , 253 Pac. 996 .

Miller v. City of Tulsa

353 P.2d 705 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 1960

Curtis et al. v. … The board of commissioners was compelled to exercise its discretion as to who would be retained and in doing so could and did make a re-assignment as to duties among those retained.” *709 In Tremp v.

Clanton v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

208 Okla. 92 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1953

It is admitted that she did certain work and operated a boarding house at some time during their marriage. … In Schwartz v.

Nebraska Bridge Supply & Lbr. Co. v. Wray Township

175 Okla. 455 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1936

, which was not sufficient to cover the entire amount contracted for, *457 In Austin-Western Road Machinery Co. v. … J., OSBORN, V. O. J., and BATLESS, BUSBT, WELCH, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. RILEY and PHELPS, JJ., ah sent.

Kemp v. Chickasha Plumbing Company

338 P.2d 1107 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1959

Co. v. … To the same effect see, Oklahoma Hospital v. Brown, 87 Okl. 46 , 208 P. 785 ; James I. Barnes Const. Co. v. Hargrove, 167 Okl. 348 , 29 P.2d 573 ; and City of Kingfisher v. Jenkins, 168 Okl. 624 , 33 P.2d 1094 .