Case law

Moss v. Hunt

47 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1914

Gibson, 22 Okla. 507 , 98 Pac. 565 ; McClelland v. Erwin, 16 Okla. 622 , 86 Pac. 283 ; Bloedel v. Cromwell, 104 Minn. 487 , 116 N. W. 947 ; Weeks v. Kip, 64 N. J. Law, 61, 44 Atl. 856 ; Chamberlain v. Wood, 15 S. … McCreary, on Elec., section 724; Rampendahl v. Crump, 24 Okla. 873 , 105 Pac. 201 .

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Ward

68 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1918

Co. v. Hughes, 64 Okla. 74 , 166 Pac. 411 ; M., O. & G. R. Co. v. Overmyre, 58 Okla. 723 , 160 Pac. 933 ; Seaboard A. L. R. Co. v. Horton, 233 U. S. 492 , 34 Sup. Ct. 635, 58 L. Ed. 1062 , L. R. A. 1915C, 1, Ann. … Co. v. Brown, 45 Okla. 143 , 144 Pac. 1075 , and denied by this court. In affirming this court in that ease, the Supreme Court, of the United States said: “The requirement of Const. U. S.

General Exchange Insurance Corp. v. Bevington

193 Okla. 216 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1943

Co. v. Wright, 54 Okla. 712 , 154 P. 654 ; Brown v. Conn. Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn., 52 Okla., 392 , 153 P. 173 ; St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Peck, 37 Okla. 85 , 130 P. 805 . … Strong City Gin Co. v. Herring & Young, 182 Okla. 628 , 79 P. 2d 582 .

Elias v. City of Tulsa

408 P.2d 517 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1965

Key v. Donnell, 107 Okl. 157 , 231 P. 546 . In Roberts v. … Decisions to the same or similar effect are Wilkinson v. Hale, 184 Okl. 165 , 86 P. 2d 305 ; Barrett v. Board of Comr’s of Tulsa County, 185 Okl. 111 , 90 P.2d 442 ; Williams v.

Seaver v. Rulison

29 Okla. 128 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1911

W. v. Furman, 6 Okla. 649 , 52 Pac. 932 ; Grand Lodge A. O. U. W. v. Edmondson, 6 Okla. 671, 52 Pac. 939 ; Board of Com’rs v. Hubble, 8 Okla. 169 , 56 Pac. 1058 . … Terrapin v. Barker, 26 Okla. 93 , 109 Pac. 931 ; Roof et al. v. Franks, 26 Okla. 392 , 110 Pac. 1098 ; Lynn et al. v. Jack son, 26 Okla. 852, 110 Pac. 727 ; Indian Land & Trust Co. v.

Randolph v. Oklahoma City General Hospital

180 Okla. 513 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1937

The defendant furnished supplies, nurses, operating room, and board. … Also, in the Case of Emerson v.

Exendine v. Goldstine

14 Okla. 100 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1904

(School District v. Trotter, 10 Okla. 625 ; Board of Commissioners v. Hovel, 8 Okla. 169 ; Devine v. Silvers, 8 Okla. 700 .)

State Ex Rel. Department of Public Welfare v. Martin

570 P.2d 623 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1977

At the time of the alleged commission of the malpractice, said hospital was operated under the Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma. … LAVENDER, V. C. J., and DAVISON, IRWIN, BERRY and BARNES, JJ., concur. HODGES, C.

Warner v. Grayson

46 Okla. 622 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1915

Sec Sanders v. Sanders et al., supra; Barnett v. Way, supra; Morley v. Fewell, 32 Okla. 452 , 122 Pac. 700 ; Shellenbarger v. Fewell, 34 Okla. 79 , 124 Pac. 617 ; Divine v. … Harmon et al., 30 Okla. 820 , 121 Pac. 219 ; De Graffenreid et al. v. Iowa Land & Trust Co., 20 Okla. 687 , 95 Pac. 624 ; Bilby v. Brown el al., 34 Okla. 738 , 126 Pac. 1024 ; Hooks v.

In Re Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

143 Okla. 217 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1930

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Tax Review denying the protest of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company against the rate of levy fixed by tbe excise board of Cotton county for the drag fund … J., LESTER, V. O. J., and RILEY, J., absent. Note — See “Taxation,” 37 Cyc. p. 1097, n. 92; p. 1118, n. 8.

OLIVER v. HOFMEISTER

368 P.3d 1270 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 2016

Gurney, supra. , Board of Educ., Ind. Sch. Dist. No. 52 v. Antone, 1963 OK 165 , 384 P.2d 911 . … CHILDERS Discussed at Length 1963 OK 165 , 384 P.2d 911 , BOARD OF EDUC., IND. SCH. DIST. NO. 52 v. ANTONE Discussed 2008 OK 6 , 180 P.3d 1191 , LIDDELL v.

Miller v. Durrill

176 Okla. 402 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1936

In Omaha Bridge & Terminal Railway Co. v. Reed (Neb.) 90 N. … In the recent case of Morse v.

Wood v. Biggs

424 P.2d 59 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1966

Bank v. Lokey, 112 Okl. 82 , 240 P. 101 and Pettis v. Johnston, 78 Okl. 277 , 190 P. 681 . See also Whelan v. Adams, 44 Okl. 696 , 145 P. 1158 , L.R.A.1915D 551. … The plaintiffs in error cite the cases of In Re Musselman’s Estate, 167 Okl. 560 , 31 P.2d 142 , In re Richard’s Estate, Okl., 294 P.2d 818 , and Brown v.

Great Lakes Pipe Line Co. v. Smith

271 P.2d 1112 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1954

lines where they crossed such places were painted red on top; that the six-inch pipe line where so exposed and the supporting iron works for such crossings were painted aluminum on the outside and underneath had a reddish-brown … Where conflicting inferences can be drawn from the evidence the case is for the jury; Haddock v. Sticelber & Mong, 65 Okl. 254 , 165 P. 1138 .

State v. Stephenson-Browne Lbr. Co.

180 Okla. 619 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1937

See State v. Planters Gin Co., 175 Okla. 386 , 52 P. (2d) 710 . … See Home Building & Loan Ass’n v. State, 156 Okla. 89 , 9 P. (2d) 731 .

In Re Smith's Estate

202 Okla. 302 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 27, 1949

We have previously held, in Hamilton et al. v. … Ingram v. Basye, 67 Ore. 257 , 135 P. 883 ; Owings v. Dayhoff, 159 Md. 403 , 151 Atl. 240 . We believe that, under the facts in this case, the burden was upon the estate of W. W.

King v. Huffines

454 P.2d 670 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1969

This principle was reiterated forcefully in Littlefield v. Howery, Okl., 266 P.2d 957, 959 . Most recently in Caddo Ind. S. D., etc. v. … Littlefield v. Howery, supra; Edwards v. Pierce, supra.

Hancock v. Youree

25 Okla. 460 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1910

W. 297 ; Maple v. Nelson, 31 Iowa, 322 ; Brown v. Butters et al., 40 Iowa, 544 ; Doe v. Craft, 2 Ind. 359 ; Evans v. Ashby et al., 22 Ind. 15 ; Tyler v. Wilkerson et al., 27 Ind. 450; Smith v. … Moore v. Nowell, 94 N. C. 265 ; Patrick v. Railroad, 93 N. C. 422 ; Harris v. Sneeden, 104 N. C. 369 [ 10 S. E. 477 ].”

Cosmos Mining Co. v. State Industrial Commission

101 Okla. 283 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1924

Associated Employers’ Reciprocal v. State Industrial Commission, 83 Okla. 73 , 200 Pac. *285 862; Hogan v. Industrial Commission, 86 Okla. 161 , 207 Pac. 303 ; Huttig Lead & Zinc Co. v. … Brown, 90 Okla. 80 , 215 Pac. 1056 . It is our opinion that there is no evidence in this case connecting the injuries complained of with the injury received by the claimant while employed by the respondent.

Wright v. Miller

109 Okla. 47 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 17, 1925

Brown v. Davidson, 42 Okla. 598 , 142 Pac. 387 ; Spaulding v. Howard, 5l Okla. 502, 152 Pac. 106 ; Simonoff v. Parsons, 52 Okla. 600 , 153 Pac. 152 ; Talley v. … Harrison, 60 Okla. 110 , 159 Pac. 366 ; Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Ware, 71 Okla. 19 , 174 Pac. 1066 .