Case law

Davis v. State Board of Medical Examiners

181 Okla. 385 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1937

In Freeman v. State Board of Examiners, 54 Okla. 531 , 154 P. 56 , we considered a proceeding originating before the same board to revoke the license of a pr'aetic-ing physician. … In Oliver v. State, 122 Okla. 66 , 251 P. 31 , a similar proceeding before the same board was involved. The accused physician there desired a review of the hoard’s decision. .

Harrell v. County Election Board

203 Okla. 360 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 4, 1950

He deposited $250 in cash with the board for the purpose of defraying the expense of the recount. … Coe v. State Election Board et al., 203 Okla. 356 , 221 P. 2d 774 , and for the reasons therein stated, was and is sufficient to entitle said petitioner to a recount as prayed for. Writ granted.

Kay County, Excise Board v. Davis

187 Okla. 494 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1940

WELCH, V. C. J. In the annual estimate of Kaw City the county excise board inserted and added an item of $1,000 for audit of the books, records, and accounts of Kaw City. … Plaintiff in error does cite City of Ardmore v.

Smilie v. Taft Stadium Board of Control

201 Okla. 303 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1949

In the case of Warren Co. v. … In the case of Morris v.

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Seely

621 P.2d 534 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1980

This Court does not disagree with the Board’s first broad contention that conducting a liquor-related business is a privilege granted by the State. In Brown Distributing Co. v. … State v. Parham, 412 P.2d 142, 147 (Okl.1966).

Stubbs v. Excise Board of Muskogee County

173 Okla. 341 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1935

Collet v. Allison, 1 Okla. 42 , 25 P. 516 ; Rider v. Brown, 1 Okla. 244 , 32 P. 341 ; Davis v. Caruthers, 22 Okla. 323 , 97 P. 581 ; Thompson v. State ex rel. Cooksey, 25 Okla. 741 , 108 P. 398 ; Jones v. … State v. Couch, 31 Okla. 206 , 120 P. 915 ; City of Guthrie v. Stewart, 45 Okla. 603 , 146 P. 585 ; Cotton v. Harris, 108 Okla. 203 , 235 P. 607 ; Herndon v. Excise Board of Garfield County, 147 Okla. 126 , 295 P. 223 .

Bell v. Board of County Commissioners

335 P.2d 633 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1959

We still think that the rule is sound that is laid down in Board of Directors of School Dist. No. 27 of Oklahoma County v. … Board of Excise of Oklahoma County, *636 31 Okl. 553 , 122 P. 520 and Excise Board of Tulsa County v. City of Tulsa, 180 Okl. 248 , 68 P.2d 823 . The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. DAVISON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V.

Tulsa County, Excise Board v. Kurn

188 Okla. 123 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1940

WELCH, V. C. J. This case involves the same questions this day determined in No. 29960, Tulsa County, Excise Board, v. Texas-Empire Pipe Line Company et al., 188 Okla. 128 , 106 P. 2d 792 .

Kenoyer v. Board of Equal., Ottawa County

130 Okla. 3 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 1928

Plaintiff in error filed his protest before the equalization board, and after his protest was denied by that body, he lodged an appeal therefrom to the district court. … The district court sustained the action of the equalization board in assessing the land, and also the sum at which it was assessed.

Toliver v. Board of Managers, Etc.

142 Okla. 187 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 1930

The personal defendants constitute the board of managers of the associatiotn. … P. v.

State, Department of Institutions, Social & Rehabilitative Services v. Brown

532 P.2d 839 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1975

The trial court entered judgment against Watie Brown for $3,630, but entered judgment for Nell Brown. Appellant appeals from the judgment insofar as it denies appellant judgment against Nell Brown. … In Perry v.

Liberty National Bank v. County Excise Board

175 Okla. 245 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1935

In the case of Hume v. … A writ of mandamus will not lie v here its issuance would work injustice or introduce confusion and disorder. Webster v. Morris, 129 Okla. 145 , 264 P. 190 ; Board of Ed. of Guthrie v.

Oklahoma Planning and Resources Board v. Herren

341 P.2d 599 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1959

Herren, hereinafter called claimant, filed his claim for compensation against Oklahoma Planning and Resources Board and its insurance carrier, the State Insurance Fund, and under date of July 24, 1957, claimant was awarded … WILLIAMS, V. C. J., dissents.

Stockton v. Excise Board of Payne County

155 Okla. 120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1932

Board of Education v. Excise Board of Payne County, No. 23153, decided Jan. 26, 1932, 155 Okla. 227, 7 (2d) 473, and School Dist. No. 4, Garfield Co., v. Independent School Dist. … This question has been decided adversely to them in the case of Excise Board of Creek Co. v. State ex rel. Kissick, 105 Okla. 102 , 231 P. 862 .

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Naifeh

388 P.2d 855 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1964

Such action by defendant was in direct violation of 37 O.S.1961 § 536, and the rules and regulations promulgated by the Board. In the case of Lightle v. … J., HALLEY, V. C. J., and JOHNSON, JACKSON and IRWIN, JJ., concur.

Barnsdall Oil Co. v. State Board

171 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1935

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization, cause No. 24271, decided Feb. 12, 1935, 170 Okla. 516 , 41 P. (2d) 453 , having disposed of this matter, the appeal is dismissed.

Lowden v. Seminole County Excise Board

185 Okla. 428 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1939

Branch v. Excise Board of Oklahoma County, 171 Okla. 585 , 43 P.2d 90 . In connection with the case of Branch v. … Greer County Excise Board v. Lowden et al. 177 Okla. 7 , 57 P.2d 612 . The judgment of the Court of Tax Review denying the protest is sustained. *431 BAYLESS, O. J., WELCH, V. C.

Cleveland Nat. Bank v. Board of Education

72 Okla. 144 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1919

This action was brought by the hank for money had and received by the board of education. … Helm v. Mickleson, 66 Okla. 299 , *145 170 Pac. 704 ; Anderson v. Anderson, 65 Okla. 149 , 165 Pac. 150 ; Joiner v. Ardmore L. & Tr. Co., 33 Okla. 266 , 124 Pac. 1073 ; Brooks t. Hinton St.

Null v. Board of Com'rs., Latimer Co.

98 Okla. 16 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1924

Stat. 1921, provides as follows: “Any survey made by the county surveyor, under the order of the board of county commissioners, in laying out any road or highway along any section or subdivision line of a section, if not … Tholl v. Koles, 65 Kan. 802 , 70 Pac. 881 ; Mills v. Glasscock, 26 Okla. 123 , 110 Pac. 377 . 4.

Board of Com'rs v. State Industrial Commission

184 Okla. 133 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1938

Brown testified on both hearings. On the first hearing his statement was made of record by agreement. … Barnes Drilling Co. v. West, supra; Texas Co. v. Roberts, 146 Okla. 140 , 294 P. 180 ; Oklahoma Hospital v. Brown, 87 Okla. 46 , 208 P. 785 ; Fain Drilling Co. v. Deatherage, 179 Okla. 409 , 65 P.2d 1212 .