Case law

Bozarth v. Mitchell

59 Okla. 60 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1916

In Bowen v. … Harnage v. Martin, supra. See also Bowen v. Carter, supra; Leak et al. v. Joslyn, 20 Okla. 200 , 94 Pac. 518 ; Mitchell v. Bell, 31 Okl. 117 , 120 Pac. 560 ; Citizens' Trading Co. v.

Thornton v. Troublefield

649 P.2d 538 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 27, 1982

Co. v. Stailey, 461 P.2d 940 (Okl.1960); Howey v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 516 P.2d 821 (Okl.1973); Sooner Const. Co. v. Brown, 544 P.2d 500 (Okl.1975). … Ada Iron & Metal Co. v. Tarpley, supra; Barnsdall Refining Co. v. Ramsdall, 149 Okl. 99 , 299 P. 499 (1931).

Proctor v. Royal Neighbors of America

172 Okla. 529 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 1935

Board of County Commissioners v. Robertson, 35 Okla. 616 , 130 P. 947 ; Cardin Bldg. Co. v. Smith, 125 Okla. 300 , 258 P. 910 . The plaintiff in error nest complains that the court erred in allowing Francis J. … Also, in Board v. State ex rel. Walcott, Bank Com’r, et al., 117 Okla. 10 , 242 P. 522 , in the body of the opinion it is stated: “The court of its own motion may order additional parties brought in. Simpson v.

Wilson v. Harlow Publishing Corporation

180 Okla. 284 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1937

Brown v. Walker, 73 Okla. 108 , 174 P. 1050 . AppeTant’s second assignment of error is as follows". … Co. v. Goble, 77 Okla. 206 , 186 P. 723 .

Bridges v. Rea

64 Okla. 115 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 16, 1916

For in Brown et al. v. Trent et al., 36 Okla. 239 , 128 Pac. 895 , we said: ‘‘Fraud vitiates everything founded upon it, and when the fraud is established no court will give effect to a judgment so procured. … As to whether this is a direct or collateral attack was correctly decided and put at rest in Brown et al. v.

Watson v. Borah

37 Okla. 357 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1913

In Barnes et al. v. … Lynch, 9 Okla. 158 , 59 Pac. 995 ; Richardson v. Hockaday, 12 Okla. 546 , 73 Pac. 957 ; Franks v. Jones, 39 Kan. 241 , 17 Pac. 663 ; Caldwell v. Brown, 56 Kan. 566 , 44 Pac. 10 .

McKay v. Roe

96 Okla. 87 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1923

It is conceded that in the cases of In re Estate of Robert Pigeon, 81 Okla. 180 , 198 Pac. 309 ; Teague v. Smith, 85 Okla. 12 , 204 Pac. 439 ; Harrison v. Harrison, 87 Okla. 91 , 209 Pac. 737 ; Murray v. … Law (10th Ed.) 392; Martin v. Martin, 98 Ark. 93 and 99, 135 S. W. 348 ; Brown v. Whaley, 58 Ohio St. 654 and 666, 49 N. E. 479 , 65 Am. St. Rep. 793 ; 2 C. J. 1335. This court, in the case of Crouthamel v.

Bailess v. Paukune

208 Okla. 146 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 24, 1953

estate located in Caddo County for ad valorem taxes, and to permanently enjoin the County Treasurer of Caddo County from selling the land for delinquent taxes, and to strike said land from the tax rolls and to enjoin the board … Bailess v. Paukune, 344 U.S. 171 , 73 S.Ct. 198 , 97 L.Ed. —. The decision of that court is binding upon every one on this Federal question. See Texas Co. v.

Nicklas v. Crowell

205 Okla. 432 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1951

In Johnson v. … In Janeway v.

Protest of O'Hornett

149 Okla. 160 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1931

O’Hornett et al. against alleged illegal and excessive tax levies for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1928, made by the county excise board of Okmulgee county. Thei appeal involves a library! … Jones, County Treasurer of Okmulgee County, v. Chas. Blaine, No. 20026, 149 Okla. 153 , 300 Pac. 369 .

Ramsey v. Fowler

308 P.2d 654 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1957

In the case of Brown v. Harmon, 115 Okl. 277 , 242 P. 1047 , we discussed the degree of proof required to' establish a cause of action of this nature. … Adams v. Porter, 58 Okl. 225 , 158 P. 899, 900 .

State ex rel. Fallis v. Mike Kelly Construction Co.

638 P.2d 455 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1981

Wray v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Okl., 442 P.2d 309 (1968); Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Welch, Okl., 446 P.2d 268 (1968). … See also, Commonwealth v. Rush, 173 Ky. 771 , 191 S.W. 498 (1917). Oklahoma has followed these general principles. In Board of Regents v. National Collegiate Ath.

Eudaly v. Superior Oil Co.

270 P.2d 335 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1954

Meade Land & Cattle Co., 71 Kan. 739 , 81 P. 496 and Brown v. Massey, 13 Okl. 670, 671 , 76 P. 226 , in support of their proposition one. … Wilcox v. Westerheide, 199 Okl. 312 , 185 P.2d 452 , 173 A.L.R. 1171 . See also, Brown v. Clark, 181 Okl. 473 , 74 P.2d 933 , and Courtney v. Worley, 181 Okl. 399 , 74 P.2d 370 .

Webb v. Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co.

88 Okla. 183 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1923

Standard Stone Co. v. Greer, 52 Okla. 595 , 153 Pac. 640 ; Thompson v. Board of Com’rs of Delaware County, 56 Okla. 79 , 155 Pac. 881 ; Reed v. Mullen, 57 Okla. 179 , 156 Pac. 1172 ; Watson v. … Gill, 75 Okla. 147 , 182 Pac. 493 ; State ex rel. v. Alexander, 77 Okla. 87 , 186 Pac. 1080 ; Parker v. U. S. Smelter Co., 80 Okla. 129 , 194 Pac. 897 . This appeal is dismissed. JOHNSON, V. O.

Wilsey, Bennett Co. v. Grant

632 P.2d 382 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1981

Board of Education of Oklahoma City, 190 Okl. 533 , 125 P.2d 989, 993 [1942], . Bradford Electric Light Co. v. Clapper, 286 U.S. 145 , 160-161, 52 S.Ct. 571 , 576, 76 L.Ed. 1026 , 1035-1036 [1931]; McLean v. … Mundy, 81 So.2d 501, 503 [Fla.1955]; Martensen v. Schutte Lumber Co., 236 Mo.App. 1084 , 162 S.W.2d 312, 316-317 [1942], . Cummings v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, supra note 8. . 85 O.S.1971 § 11. .

Kernodle v. Elder

23 Okla. 743 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1909

Getchel v. Hill, 21 Minn. 464 ; Feeney v. Spalding, 89 Me. 111 , 35 Atl. 1027 ; Stern v. Lanng, 106 La. 738 , 31 South. 303 ; Hesser v. Knippel, Mich. N. P. (Brown) 109; Tomer v. Aiken et al., 126 Iowa, 114 , 101 N. … W. 769 ; Craig, v. Chambers et ux., 17 Ohio St. 254 ; Ewing et al. v. Goode (C. C.) 78 Fed. 442 . In the case last cited, Ewing et al. v.

Clanton v. City of Altus

102 Okla. 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1924

Ryan, 32 Okla. 738 , 124 Pac. 19 ; Garvin Co. v. Linsay Bridge Co., 32 Okla. 784 , 124 Pac. 324 ; Giles et al v. Dennison et al., 15 Okla. 55 , 78 Pac. 174 ; Campbell et al. v. … DeVitt et al. v. City of El Reno et al., supra; Board of Commissioners of Woods Co. v. Oxley, 8 Okla. 502 , 58 Pac. 651 ; Mooney et al. v.

In Re House Bill No. 145

205 Okla. 364 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1951

To the same effect see also: State v. Walker, 192 Iowa 823 , 185 N.W. 619 ; State v. Hickman, 195 Iowa 765 , 193 N.W. 21 ; State v. Norton, 64 N. D. 675 , supra; State v. Rosenberg, 155 Minn. 37 , 192 N. … State, 224 Ala. 540 , 141 So. 201 ; People, etc., v. Traeger, 372 Ill. 11 , 22 N.E. 2d 679 ; Browning v. State, 120 Ohio St. 62 , 165 N.E. 566 .

Hinds v. Dandee Mfg. Co.

206 Okla. 392 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1952

As supporting this proposition he also cites Leonora National Bank v. Ragland, 128 Ky. 548 , 108 S. W. 854 ; Brown v. … In Potter v.

Shell Oil Co. v. Tate

194 Okla. 23 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1944

See Garrett v. Haworth, 183 Okla. 569 , 83 P. 2d 822 ; Gripe v. Hatmaker, 189 Okla. 317 , 116 P. 2d 973 ; Bowles v. Brown, 187 Okla. 264 , 102 P. 2d 837 . … While, as pointed out in Davon Oil Co. v.