Case law

McVickers v. Zerger

389 P.2d 977 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1964

See Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Mullen, 206 Okl. 636 , 245 P.2d 1142 . … Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Mullen, supra.

International Harvester Co. of America v. Cameron

25 Okla. 256 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 11, 1909

In the case of Leforce v. … Goodwin et al. v. Bick ford, 20 Okla. 91 , 93 Pac. 548 ; Baker v. Hammett et al., 23 Okla. 480 , 100 Pac. 1114 ; Stone v. Clogston, ante, p. 162, 105 Pac. 642 ; Board of County Com’rs of Garfield County v.

National Lbr. & Mfg. Co. v. Elred

77 Okla. 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 23, 1919

Humphreys, and certain members of its board of directors, all of whose names are, at this time unknown to the plaintiff, and that said money was furnished to the defendant company as credits on its account in the American … McCoy v. Wosika, 75 Oklahoma, 180 Pac. 967 ; Dickenson v. Perry, 75 Oklahoma, 181 Pac. 504 ; Tulsa Hospital Assn. v. Juby, 73 Oklahoma, 175 Pac. 519 .

Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. State

182 Okla. 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1938

Co. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co., supra; Oklahoma City v. Corporation Commission, 80 Okla. 194 , 195 P. 498 ; Southern Oil Corporation v. Yale Natural Gas Co., 89 Okla. 121 , 214 P. 131 (aff. 266. U. S. 583, 69 L. … Co. v. Collins & Co., 157 Okla. 49 , 9 P. (2d) 438 .

Graney v. Midland Valley Ry. Co.

111 Okla. 128 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1925

The plaintiff testified that it was necessary to do the work in this manner in order to avoid the necessity for the train to stop for him to board, otherwise it would be necessary for the plaintiff to walk some five or six … Lee v. Central R. Co. (Ga.) 12 S. E. 307 ; Cook v. U. S. Smelting Co. (Utah) 97 Pac. 28 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Fick, 47 Okla. 530 , 149 Pac. 1126 ; C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Tate, 57 Okla. 215 , 156 Pac. 1182 ; St.

Bishop's Restaurants, Inc. of Tulsa v. Whomble

355 P.2d 560 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1960

Reyes v. Goss, 205 Okl. 140 , 235 P.2d 950 ; Rein v. … Browne v. Bassett, 191 Okl. 22 , 126 P.2d 705 ; Dowell, Inc. v. Layton, Okl., 261 P.2d 885 .

City of Lawton v. Ayres

40 Okla. 524 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1914

Board of Education v. West, Atty. Gen., 29, Okla. 503, 118 Pac. 146 .

City of Tulsa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.

123 Okla. 176 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1926

Appellant cites the case of United States Rubber Co. v. … And in the case of Little v.

Switzer Adv. Co. v. White

188 Okla. 567 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 1941

Veazey Drug Co. v. Bruza, 169 Okla. 418 , 37 P. 2d 294 ; Oklahoma Steel Casting Co. v. Banks, 181 Okla. 503 , 74 P. 2d 1168 ; Southland Refining Co. v. … State Industrial Commission, 167 Okla. 3 , 27 P. 2d 827 ; Hardy Sanitarium v. De Hart, 164 Okla. 29 , 22 P. 2d 379 ; Rorabaugh- *569 Brown Dry Goods Co. v. Mathews, 162 Okla. 283 , 20 P. 2d 141 .

First Nat. Bank of Lawton v. Humphreys

66 Okla. 186 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1917

Bank v. Cochran, 17 Okla. 538 , 87 Pac. 855 ; McNinch v. Northwest Thresher Co., 23 Okla. 386 , 100 Pac. 524 , 138 Am. St. Rep. 803 ; First Bank of Texas v. Terrell, 44 Okla. 719 , 145 Pac. 1140 , Ann. Cas. 1917A, 681. … should be referred to the board of directors whose action should be final.

Bozarth v. Mitchell

59 Okla. 60 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1916

In Bowen v. … Harnage v. Martin, supra. See also Bowen v. Carter, supra; Leak et al. v. Joslyn, 20 Okla. 200 , 94 Pac. 518 ; Mitchell v. Bell, 31 Okl. 117 , 120 Pac. 560 ; Citizens' Trading Co. v.

Thornton v. Troublefield

649 P.2d 538 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 27, 1982

Co. v. Stailey, 461 P.2d 940 (Okl.1960); Howey v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 516 P.2d 821 (Okl.1973); Sooner Const. Co. v. Brown, 544 P.2d 500 (Okl.1975). … Ada Iron & Metal Co. v. Tarpley, supra; Barnsdall Refining Co. v. Ramsdall, 149 Okl. 99 , 299 P. 499 (1931).

Gulager v. Coon

93 Okla. 62 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1923

In Blaine County Bank v. … Hutchison v. Brown. 66 Okla. 250 , 167 Pac. 624 .

Wilson v. Harlow Publishing Corporation

180 Okla. 284 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1937

Brown v. Walker, 73 Okla. 108 , 174 P. 1050 . AppeTant’s second assignment of error is as follows". … Co. v. Goble, 77 Okla. 206 , 186 P. 723 .

Laffoon v. Kantor

375 P.2d 961 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1962

Lee v. … Cherry v. Brown, 79 Okl. 215 , 192 P. 227 , 13 A.L.R. 92 ; Jones v. Duncan, 168 Okl. 598 , 35 P.2d 451 ; Bruner v. Hart, 178 Okl. 222 , 62 P.2d 513 , and State ex rel. Schuman et al. v.

OLIVER v. HOFMEISTER

368 P.3d 1270 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 2016

Gurney, supra. , Board of Educ., Ind. Sch. Dist. No. 52 v. Antone, 1963 OK 165 , 384 P.2d 911 . … CHILDERS Discussed at Length 1963 OK 165 , 384 P.2d 911 , BOARD OF EDUC., IND. SCH. DIST. NO. 52 v. ANTONE Discussed 2008 OK 6 , 180 P.3d 1191 , LIDDELL v.

State Ex Rel. Power v. Wenner

121 Okla. 190 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1926

Power and others, as the board of education of school district No. 60 of said county. … This court in the case of State ex rel. v.

Bailess v. Paukune

208 Okla. 146 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 24, 1953

estate located in Caddo County for ad valorem taxes, and to permanently enjoin the County Treasurer of Caddo County from selling the land for delinquent taxes, and to strike said land from the tax rolls and to enjoin the board … Bailess v. Paukune, 344 U.S. 171 , 73 S.Ct. 198 , 97 L.Ed. —. The decision of that court is binding upon every one on this Federal question. See Texas Co. v.

Nicklas v. Crowell

205 Okla. 432 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1951

In Johnson v. … In Janeway v.

Olentine v. Powell

23 Okla. 363 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1909

Board of Commissioners of Custer County v. Robert G. Moon, 8 Okla. 205 , 57 Pac. 161 ; Gardenshire v. Burdick, 7 Okla. 212 , 54 Pac. 483 ; Sproat v. Burland, 7 Okla. 230 , 54 Pac. 458 .