Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

3.49s

  • Fent v. Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority

    984 P.2d 200 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1999

    Oklahoma Industries Authority v. Barnes, supra, 769 P.2d at 119 . … See also Walters v.

    Cited 60 timesPublished
  • Midland Valley R. Co. v. Cox

    69 Okla. 123 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1916

    Co. v. … In City of Woodward v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cunningham v. Moser

    91 Okla. 44 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 29, 1923

    Brown v. Walker, 72 Oklahoma, 174 Pac. 1050 . The defendants in the ease at bar should have specifically remitted in their amended counterclaim all sums above $200. This they did not do. In Wagstaff v. … In Greeley v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Callahan v. Cowley Riddle

    117 Okla. 58 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 16, 1926

    Cressler v. Brown et al., 79 Okla. 170 , 192 Pac. 417 . … Under White v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • LAWSON v. LeFLORE CO. DETENTION CENTER PUBLIC TRUST SECURITY COMM.

    2025 OK 87 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 2025

    OSCN Found Document:LAWSON v. LeFLORE CO. DETENTION CENTER PUBLIC TRUST SECURITY COMM. LAWSON v. LeFLORE CO. … See Lawson v. Sequoyah Cnty. 911 Trust Auth. , 2022 OK CIV APP 39 521 P.3d 827 Lawson v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. Welch

    764 P.2d 191 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 1988

    See also Excise Board of Grady County v. Griggs, 192 Okl. 636 , 138 P.2d 829, 831 [1943]. . See Pruitt v. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Company, supra note 9 at 496-497 and Excise Board of Grady County v. … Board of Com’rs v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Sisler v. Sapulpa Industrial Finance Corp.

    172 Okla. 207 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1935

    Cogswell Lumber Co. v. Manahan, 135 Okla. 174 , 274 P. 871 ; Harrelson et al. v. Brown et al., 131 Okla. 267 , 268 P. 731 ; Nolan v. Schaetzel et al., 145 Okla. 231 , 292 P. 353 ; Miller v. … Rose v. First National Bank, 93 Okla. 120 , 219 P. 715 ; Robinson v. Peru Plow & Wheel Co., 1 Okla. 140 , 31 P. 988 ; St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. Jones, 78 Okla. 204 , 190 P. 385 ; Selby v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Moss v. Hunt

    47 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1914

    Gibson, 22 Okla. 507 , 98 Pac. 565 ; McClelland v. Erwin, 16 Okla. 622 , 86 Pac. 283 ; Bloedel v. Cromwell, 104 Minn. 487 , 116 N. W. 947 ; Weeks v. Kip, 64 N. J. Law, 61, 44 Atl. 856 ; Chamberlain v. Wood, 15 S. … McCreary, on Elec., section 724; Rampendahl v. Crump, 24 Okla. 873 , 105 Pac. 201 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Prudential Property & Casualty Co. v. Grimes

    725 P.2d 1246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1986

    In Green v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln Co., 126 Okl. 300 , 259 P. 635 (1927) the commissioners by resolution and notice called an election at which county bonds for road improvements could be voted. … V, § 54, Okl.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Grigsby v. Silvers

    198 Okla. 526 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1947

    This is an action filed by the county attorney of Grady county to enjoin the defendant from practicing optometry without first obtaining a certificate from the State Board of Optometry. … Cherry v. Sharp, 172 Okla. 241 , 45 P. 2d 70 ; Barnsdall Oil Co. et al. v. Jackson, 180 Okla. 589 , 71 P. 2d 719 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Nichols v. Levy

    151 Okla. 245 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 26, 1931

    In Dixon v. … Foote v. Town of Watonga, 37 Okla. 43 , 130 Pac. 597 ; Glasco v. State Election Board, 121 Okla. 119 , 248 Pac. 642 ; Cooley on Constitutional Limitations, pages 81-84.

    Overruled on other grounds by Dobbs v. Board of County Com'rs of Oklahoma County, 208 Okla. 514 (1953)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McVickers v. Zerger

    389 P.2d 977 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1964

    See Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Mullen, 206 Okl. 636 , 245 P.2d 1142 . … Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Mullen, supra.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Flowerdale Greenhouses, Inc. v. McJunkin

    106 Okla. 202 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1925

    The issues involved in this case are identical with the issues involved in, the case of Flowerdale Greenhouses Inc., v. E. J. … Stat. 1921, which provides that a writ of mandamus may be issued to any inferior tribunal, board, oa- person, to compel the performance of any action, which the law specially enjoins as a duty resulting from an office, trust

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • International Harvester Co. of America v. Cameron

    25 Okla. 256 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 11, 1909

    In the case of Leforce v. … Goodwin et al. v. Bick ford, 20 Okla. 91 , 93 Pac. 548 ; Baker v. Hammett et al., 23 Okla. 480 , 100 Pac. 1114 ; Stone v. Clogston, ante, p. 162, 105 Pac. 642 ; Board of County Com’rs of Garfield County v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. State

    182 Okla. 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1938

    Co. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co., supra; Oklahoma City v. Corporation Commission, 80 Okla. 194 , 195 P. 498 ; Southern Oil Corporation v. Yale Natural Gas Co., 89 Okla. 121 , 214 P. 131 (aff. 266. U. S. 583, 69 L. … Co. v. Collins & Co., 157 Okla. 49 , 9 P. (2d) 438 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Francis

    65 Okla. 118 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1917

    Taylor, 101 Ill. 193 ; Thomosson v. Brown, 43 Ind. 203 ; Nugent v. Laduke, 87 Ind. 482 . In Field v. Schieffelin, 7 Johns Ch. (N. Y.) 150, 11 Am. … In Allison v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Graney v. Midland Valley Ry. Co.

    111 Okla. 128 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1925

    The plaintiff testified that it was necessary to do the work in this manner in order to avoid the necessity for the train to stop for him to board, otherwise it would be necessary for the plaintiff to walk some five or six … Lee v. Central R. Co. (Ga.) 12 S. E. 307 ; Cook v. U. S. Smelting Co. (Utah) 97 Pac. 28 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Fick, 47 Okla. 530 , 149 Pac. 1126 ; C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Tate, 57 Okla. 215 , 156 Pac. 1182 ; St.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Lbr. & Mfg. Co. v. Elred

    77 Okla. 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 23, 1919

    Humphreys, and certain members of its board of directors, all of whose names are, at this time unknown to the plaintiff, and that said money was furnished to the defendant company as credits on its account in the American … McCoy v. Wosika, 75 Oklahoma, 180 Pac. 967 ; Dickenson v. Perry, 75 Oklahoma, 181 Pac. 504 ; Tulsa Hospital Assn. v. Juby, 73 Oklahoma, 175 Pac. 519 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bishop's Restaurants, Inc. of Tulsa v. Whomble

    355 P.2d 560 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1960

    Reyes v. Goss, 205 Okl. 140 , 235 P.2d 950 ; Rein v. … Browne v. Bassett, 191 Okl. 22 , 126 P.2d 705 ; Dowell, Inc. v. Layton, Okl., 261 P.2d 885 .

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • City of Lawton v. Ayres

    40 Okla. 524 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1914

    Board of Education v. West, Atty. Gen., 29, Okla. 503, 118 Pac. 146 .

    Cited 21 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.