Case law

In Re Initiative Petition No. 317, Etc.

648 P.2d 1207 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 20, 1982

State Election Board of Oklahoma, 318 P.2d 422, 425 (Okl. 1957). See also Williamson v. Carter, 177 Okl. 382 , *1219 59 P.2d 948 (1936) and Simpson v. Hill, 128 Okl. 269 , 263 P. 635, 637 , 56 A.L.R. 706 (1927). … Musick v. State ex rel. Miles, 185 Okl. 140 , 90 P.2d 631 (1939); Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma County, 185 Okl. 342 , 91 P.2d 771 (1939) and Champlin Refining Co. v.

Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Reinhart

61 Okla. 72 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1916

Co. v. Austin, 43 Okla. 698 , 144 Pac. 1070 . … Co. v. Jones, 142 U. S. 18, 12 , Sup. Ct. 109, 35 L.

Penix v. City of Stillwater

164 Okla. 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 31, 1933

It must be shown that the governing board acted officially in the matter as a board, and that their action was duly recorded in the manner provided by law in the journal of the city, kept for such purpose. … In the ease of the City of Mangum v.

Lewis v. Atherton

5 Okla. 90 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1897

We consider many of the cases so cited inapplicable and do not think any of them support the contention of counsel, unless it be Holden v. Garrett, 23 Kas. 66 , which we shall notice later. Brown v. … “Under the recording act of 1848, the plaintiff would have been brought within the rule laid down in the case of Tuthill v. Brown, 1 G. Greene 189, and of Martin v.

Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Holloman

28 Okla. 419 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1911

Co. v. Davidson, 49 Kan. 589 , 31 Pac. 131 , a similar proceeding. … See, *423 also, Brown v. Calumet River Co., 125 Ill. 600 , 18 N. E. 283 . This rule is in keeping with that laid down in the Cen. Branch, etc., Ry. Co. v. Andrews, 37 Kan. 162 , 4 Pac. 509 , a similar action.

Richey v. City of Oklahoma City

368 P.2d 486 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 1962

Cross v. Brown, Okl., 363 P.2d 935, 937 ; Skelly Oil Company v. Waters et al., Okl., 348 P.2d 320, 322 ; Rider v. Bob Hiner Service Station, Okl., 321 P.2d 378 . … Baldwin-Hill Company v. Lochner, Okl., 359 P.2d 228 . Claimant relies on: Oklahoma City v. State Industrial Commission et al., 147 Okl. 261 , 298 P. 577 and City of Tulsa v.

Missouri Valley Bridge Co. v. State Industrial Commission

86 Okla. 209 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1922

The court in that case cited with approval the case of Board of Commissioners v. Barr, 68 Oklahoma, 173 Pac. 206 . In the case of Choctaw Portland Cement Co. v. … “The same rule has been announced in Board of Commissioners of Cleveland County v. Barr et al., 68 Oklahoma, 173 Pac. 206 .”

Dieterle Plumbing & Heating v. Green

605 P.2d 1335 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1980

Relying on Woods v. Levine, Okl., 311 P.2d 204 (1957), and Benton v. … Pirtle v.

Kee v. Bethurum

146 Okla. 237 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1930

This court, in Broaddus v. Commercial Nat. … LESTER, V. C. J., and HUNT, J., absent.

Seamans Oil Co. v. Mitchell

87 Okla. 13 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1922

In the case of Martin v. … Blue v. Board of Com’rs of Garvin Co. 82 Okla. 178 , 198 Pac. 850 .

Malone v. Malone

591 P.2d 296 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1979

However, in Ilee M. v. … Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 269 , 90 S.Ct. 1011, 1021 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970). 7 . Pirrong v. Pirrong, 552 P.2d 383 (Okl.1976). 8 . Flickinger v. Flickinger, 494 S.W.2d 388, 392 (Mo.App.1973); Williams v.

Champlin Refining Co. v. Aladdin Petroleum Corp.

205 Okla. 524 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 17, 1951

Monnet, Hayes & Brown, Oklahoma City, for defendants in error, Aladdin Petroleum Corp., Esslinger-Misch Company, A.D. Krow, Lloyd F. Cooper, and Brown, Schlessman, Owen & Company. … Bailey v. Texas-Pacific Coal & Oil Co., 168 Okla. 275 , 32 P.2d 709 ; Moody v. Wagner, 167 Okla. 99 , 23 P.2d 633 .

CITATION CO. REALTORS, INC. v. Lyon

610 P.2d 788 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1980

As stated in Blackburn v. … In either case, Onstott v. Osborne, supra, and Sokolosky v.

Midland Valley R. Co. v. Charter

115 Okla. 51 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1925

Garvin v. Harrell, 27 Okla. 373 , 113 Pac. 186 ; Whitcomb v. Oller, 41 Okla. 331 , 137 Pac. 709 ; Sulzberger & Sons Co. v. Hoover, 46 Okla. 792 , 149 Pac. 887 . … It is well settled by a long line of decisions in this court, beginning with Hamilton v.

Clark & Courts v. Greer County

8 Okla. 425 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1899

(Cullins v. Overton, 7 Okla. 470 , 54 Pac. 702 . Sweet v. Boyd, 6 Okla. 699 , 52 Pac. 939 .) … If this is a correct statement of the law as to the power and authority of. such hoards under the lawrs of Texas, then their judgments come within the rule laid down in Cullins v. Overton, 7 Okla. 470 , 54 Pac. 702 .

Mott v. Nelson

96 Okla. 117 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1923

People’s State Bank of Michigan Valley v. Brown (Kan.) 103 Pac. 102 . 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 824; First National Bank of Byars v. Griffin, 31 Okla. 382 . 120 Pac. 595 . … Winsted v. Shank, 68 Okla. 269 , 173 Pac. 1041 .

Foley v. Wilson

78 Okla. 58 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1920

Board of County Com’rs v. Langston, 41 Okla. 715 , 139 Pac. 956 . By applying this rule the appeal in this case was prematurely brought.

In Re Mo-Se-Che-He's Estate

188 Okla. 228 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1940

In Browning v. Browning (Kan.) 130 P. 852 , it is said: "The fact that the statute enumerates certain grounds for annulling a marriage does not imply that no others exist." … In Jones v.

Higginbotham v. City of the Village

361 P.2d 191 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1961

Plaintiffs rely on Makrauer v. Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa, 200 Okl. 285 , 193 P.2d 291 ; and Voight v. Saunders, 206 Okl. 318 , 243 P.2d 654 , to sustain their theory. … Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County, Okl., 285 P.2d 183 .

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Fore

562 P.2d 511 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1977

Oklahoma Bar Association v. Champion, 468 P.2d 794 (Okl.1970). … LAVENDER, V. C. J., dissents.