Case law

Robinson v. Rockett

275 P.2d 712 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 19, 1954

See Cordray v. Cordray, 19 Old. 36, 91 P. 781 ; Locke v. Gilbert, 133 Okl. 93 , 271 P. 247 ; Cashman v. Browning, 177 Okl. 446 , 60 P.2d 619 , and the discussion in Lind v. McKinley, 196 Okl. 4 , 161 P.2d 1016 . … See Kingkade v. Plummer, 111 Okl. 197 , 239 P. 628 ; Cressler v. Brown, 79 Okl. 170 , 192 P. 417 ; 44 Am.Jur., Quieting Title, Sec. 53; Annotations, 97 A.L.R. 711 .

HODARA v. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

2025 OK 47 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 2025

In Lockett v. … There, a doctor who had been disciplined by the Board of Medical Licensure sued the Board and other defendants for various torts based on the disciplinary action.

Lewis v. Atherton

5 Okla. 90 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1897

We consider many of the cases so cited inapplicable and do not think any of them support the contention of counsel, unless it be Holden v. Garrett, 23 Kas. 66 , which we shall notice later. Brown v. … “Under the recording act of 1848, the plaintiff would have been brought within the rule laid down in the case of Tuthill v. Brown, 1 G. Greene 189, and of Martin v.

Norris v. Cross, Secretary of State

25 Okla. 287 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1909

State Board of Equalization v. People ex rel. Goggin, 191 Ill. 528 , 61 N. E. 339 , 58 L. R. A. 513; People ex rel. v. Kipley, 171 Ill. 44 , 49 N. E. 229 , 41 L. R. A. 775; Heintz v. Moulton et al., 7 S. D. 272, 64 N. … Subsections 2 and 8, inclusive, of section 1 creates and provides for the appointment of a state election board and a county election board for each county of the state and an election board for each precinct of the counties

Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Holloman

28 Okla. 419 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1911

Co. v. Davidson, 49 Kan. 589 , 31 Pac. 131 , a similar proceeding. … See, *423 also, Brown v. Calumet River Co., 125 Ill. 600 , 18 N. E. 283 . This rule is in keeping with that laid down in the Cen. Branch, etc., Ry. Co. v. Andrews, 37 Kan. 162 , 4 Pac. 509 , a similar action.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Gasaway

810 P.2d 826 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1991

Oklahoma Bar Assoc. v. … Oklahoma Bar Assoc. v. Moss, see note 8, supra; State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Assoc. v. Brown, see note 8, supra; State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Assoc. v.

Richey v. City of Oklahoma City

368 P.2d 486 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 1962

Cross v. Brown, Okl., 363 P.2d 935, 937 ; Skelly Oil Company v. Waters et al., Okl., 348 P.2d 320, 322 ; Rider v. Bob Hiner Service Station, Okl., 321 P.2d 378 . … Baldwin-Hill Company v. Lochner, Okl., 359 P.2d 228 . Claimant relies on: Oklahoma City v. State Industrial Commission et al., 147 Okl. 261 , 298 P. 577 and City of Tulsa v.

Missouri Valley Bridge Co. v. State Industrial Commission

86 Okla. 209 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1922

The court in that case cited with approval the case of Board of Commissioners v. Barr, 68 Oklahoma, 173 Pac. 206 . In the case of Choctaw Portland Cement Co. v. … “The same rule has been announced in Board of Commissioners of Cleveland County v. Barr et al., 68 Oklahoma, 173 Pac. 206 .”

Comanche County Rural Water District No. 1 v. City of Lawton

501 P.2d 490 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 1, 1972

About three weeks before the District filed its petition in the district court, its Board of Directors filed a complaint against Hilliary before the Corporation Commission. … Settles v. Board of Education, Okl., 389 P.2d 356 , at page 360. The judgment of the trial court is reversed. DAVISON, V. C. J., and JACKSON, IRWIN, HODGES, LAVENDER, and McINERNEY, JJ., concur.

Coleman v. J.C. Penney Co.

848 P.2d 1158 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1993

In Page v. Hardy, 334 P.2d 782 (Okla.1959), this Court set out several factors to be considered when determining whether an employee/employer relationship exists. … Brown v. Burkett, 755 P.2d 650, 651 (Okla.1988); Leonhardt Enterprises v. Houseman, 562 P.2d 515, 518 (Okla.1977).

Munroe v. McNeill

122 Okla. 297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 22, 1927

In Glasco v. … State Election Board, 121 Okla. 119 , 248 Pac. 642 , supra, quoted with approval the case of Ohio v. Covington, 29 Ohio St. Rep. 102 , which involved a situation similar to the one at bar before this court.

McMahan v. Copiah County, Miss

84 Okla. 222 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1921

In Owen v. City of Marion et al. (Iowa) 103 N. … In Denton v.

Dieterle Plumbing & Heating v. Green

605 P.2d 1335 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1980

Relying on Woods v. Levine, Okl., 311 P.2d 204 (1957), and Benton v. … Pirtle v.

Malone v. Malone

591 P.2d 296 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1979

However, in Ilee M. v. … Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 269 , 90 S.Ct. 1011, 1021 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970). 7 . Pirrong v. Pirrong, 552 P.2d 383 (Okl.1976). 8 . Flickinger v. Flickinger, 494 S.W.2d 388, 392 (Mo.App.1973); Williams v.

Behling v. Fox Rig & Lbr. Co.

187 Okla. 682 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1940

Croxton & Bucklin et al. v. Buchanan et al., 170 Okla. 170 , 39 P. 2d 91 ; Fox et al. v. Brown et al., 176 Okla. 201 , 55 P. 2d 129 . … Baker & Co. et al. v.

Champlin Refining Co. v. Aladdin Petroleum Corp.

205 Okla. 524 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 17, 1951

Monnet, Hayes & Brown, Oklahoma City, for defendants in error, Aladdin Petroleum Corp., Esslinger-Misch Company, A.D. Krow, Lloyd F. Cooper, and Brown, Schlessman, Owen & Company. … Bailey v. Texas-Pacific Coal & Oil Co., 168 Okla. 275 , 32 P.2d 709 ; Moody v. Wagner, 167 Okla. 99 , 23 P.2d 633 .

Pardoe v. Dean

172 Okla. 101 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1935

S. v. Lombardo, 60 L. Ed. (U. S.) 897. … The challenge not having been filed with the county election board in time, the judgment is affirmed. McNEILL, C. J., OSBORN, V. O. J., and BAYLESS, BUSBY, WELCH, PHELPS, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Satterfield

135 Okla. 183 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1929

Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, supra; Chicago, R. I. & P. Railway Co. v. McGlinn, 114 U. S. 543 , 5 S. Ct. 1005 , 29 L. Ed. 270 ; Benson v. U. S., 146 U. S. 330 , 13 S. Ct. 60 , 36 L. Ed. 994 ; Palmer v. … Sill Military Reservation attached to the city of Lawton school district for school purposes and that the board of education of the city of Law-ton took such action and the Secretary of War gave such consent as is shown by

Clark & Courts v. Greer County

8 Okla. 425 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1899

(Cullins v. Overton, 7 Okla. 470 , 54 Pac. 702 . Sweet v. Boyd, 6 Okla. 699 , 52 Pac. 939 .) … If this is a correct statement of the law as to the power and authority of. such hoards under the lawrs of Texas, then their judgments come within the rule laid down in Cullins v. Overton, 7 Okla. 470 , 54 Pac. 702 .

Mott v. Nelson

96 Okla. 117 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1923

People’s State Bank of Michigan Valley v. Brown (Kan.) 103 Pac. 102 . 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 824; First National Bank of Byars v. Griffin, 31 Okla. 382 . 120 Pac. 595 . … Winsted v. Shank, 68 Okla. 269 , 173 Pac. 1041 .