Case law

Maney v. Oklahoma City

150 Okla. 77 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1931

The case of City of Shawnee v. … In the case of Oklahoma City v.

Rierdon v. Reder

178 Okla. 606 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1936

The district court case is the same number as the ease herein, being No. 18751, and it is then alleged that upon appeal to the Supreme Court in Board of Com’rs of Carter County v. … In a recent opinion, Commissioners of the Band Office v.

Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Le Flore County

187 Okla. 630 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 1940

See, also, Lowden et al. v. Excise Board of Jefferson County, 182 Okla. 413 , 77 P. 2d 1150 . … Kirk v. School District, supra.

Roberts v. Merrill

386 P.2d 780 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1963

Brown, Brown & Brown, by Lonnie Brown, McAlester, for petitioner. Pierce, Mock, Duncan, Couch & Hendrickson, by Henry F. Featherly, Oklahoma City, Charles R. Nesbitt, Atty. Gen., for respondents. *781 DAVISON, Justice. … Co. v.

Garland v. Union Trust Co.

49 Okla. 654 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1916

Board of County Commissioners v. Porter et al., 19 Okla. 175 , 92 Pac. 152 ; Stannard v. Sampson et ux., 23 Okla. 13 , 99 Pac. 796 ; St. L. & S. F. R. Co. v. Nelson, 40 Okla. 143 , 136 Pac. 590 ; C., R. I. & P., Ry. … Staples; No. 4263, Steel et al. v. Jones et al.; No. 2633, Kelley et al. v. State; No. 5209, St. L. & S. F. R. Co. v. Brown; No. 5667, Wadsworth et al. v. Crump et al.; No. *667 5707, Coss et al. v.

American Investment Co. v. Baker

122 Okla. 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1926

Bank v. Brown, 62 Okla. 112 , 162 Pac. 454 , C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Austin, 63 Okla. 169 , 163 Pac. 617 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Hardy, 45 Okla. 423 , 146 Pac. 38 ; C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. … Co. v. Webb, 36 Okla. 235 , 128 Pac. 252 . In First National Bank v.

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

151 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1931

S. 1921, requiring the designating of dragable roads and the appointment of the township superintendent, are directory and not prerequisite and jurisdictional to the right of the county excise board to levy a road drag tax … CLARK, V. C. J., and HEi<NER, J., absent.

Frensley v. White

208 Okla. 209 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 17, 1953

In support of their position that such was the effect of the provision, defendants rely most strongly upon the opinions in the cases of Board of Chosen Freeholders of Cumberland County v. … In the case of Board of Chosen Freeholders of Cumberland County v. Buck, supra, “The use of the property for the purpose named has now been permanently abandoned.” The Jordan v.

Munroe v. McNeill

122 Okla. 297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 22, 1927

In Glasco v. … State Election Board, 121 Okla. 119 , 248 Pac. 642 , supra, quoted with approval the case of Ohio v. Covington, 29 Ohio St. Rep. 102 , which involved a situation similar to the one at bar before this court.

Richey v. City of Oklahoma City

368 P.2d 486 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 1962

Cross v. Brown, Okl., 363 P.2d 935, 937 ; Skelly Oil Company v. Waters et al., Okl., 348 P.2d 320, 322 ; Rider v. Bob Hiner Service Station, Okl., 321 P.2d 378 . … Baldwin-Hill Company v. Lochner, Okl., 359 P.2d 228 . Claimant relies on: Oklahoma City v. State Industrial Commission et al., 147 Okl. 261 , 298 P. 577 and City of Tulsa v.

Comanche County Rural Water District No. 1 v. City of Lawton

501 P.2d 490 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 1, 1972

About three weeks before the District filed its petition in the district court, its Board of Directors filed a complaint against Hilliary before the Corporation Commission. … Settles v. Board of Education, Okl., 389 P.2d 356 , at page 360. The judgment of the trial court is reversed. DAVISON, V. C. J., and JACKSON, IRWIN, HODGES, LAVENDER, and McINERNEY, JJ., concur.

Dieterle Plumbing & Heating v. Green

605 P.2d 1335 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1980

Relying on Woods v. Levine, Okl., 311 P.2d 204 (1957), and Benton v. … Pirtle v.

State ex rel. Grigsby v. Silvers

198 Okla. 526 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1947

This is an action filed by the county attorney of Grady county to enjoin the defendant from practicing optometry without first obtaining a certificate from the State Board of Optometry. … Cherry v. Sharp, 172 Okla. 241 , 45 P. 2d 70 ; Barnsdall Oil Co. et al. v. Jackson, 180 Okla. 589 , 71 P. 2d 719 .

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Hardey

495 P.2d 825 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1972

The record also shows that respondent had previously received a private reprimand before the Board of Governors of the Oklahoma Bar Association as a result of his professional misconduct in an unrelated case. … DAVISON, V. C. J., and WILLIAMS, JACKSON, IRWIN, LAVENDER, Mc-INERNEY and BARNES, JJ., concur.

Taylor v. Insurance Co. of North America

25 Okla. 92 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1909

Co. v. Tewes, 132 Ill. App. 321; Williamson v. Warfield-Pratt-Howell Co., 136 Ill App. 168; Mississippi Valley Ins. Co. v. Bermond, 45 Ill. App. 22 ; Hamburg-Bremen Fire Ins. Co. v. Browning, 103 Va. 890 , 48 S. … Soc. v. Brown, 213 U. S. 25 , 29 Sup. Ct. 404, 53 L. Ed. 682 . Hence we hold that the policy was not canceled; no tender having been timely made. 3.

City of Muskogee v. Bebee

193 Okla. 311 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 19, 1943

Oklahoma City v. State Industrial Commission, 147 Okla. 261 , 147 Okla. 303 , 298 P. 577 . Notice, also, holdings and discussions appearing in Board of County Commissioners of Marshall County v. … Lacy, 161 Okla. 138 , 17 P. 2d 398 ; Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Bilby, 174 Okla. 199 , 50 P. 2d 398 .

Southwestern Surety Ins. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

75 Okla. 232 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1919

Joint-Stock Bank v. Bailey (1899) App. Cas. 396; Lee v. Dick, 10 Pet. 482 , 9 L. Ed. 503 ; Crist v. Burlingame, 62 Barb. (N. Y.) 351; Hoey v. Jarman, 39 N. J. Law, 523; Locke v. … Banks v. Brown, 4 Yerg. (Tenn.) 198; Brandt on Suretyship (3d Ed.) sec. 520. In this action it is not sought to hold the defendant on this liability.

Foley v. Wilson

78 Okla. 58 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1920

Board of County Com’rs v. Langston, 41 Okla. 715 , 139 Pac. 956 . By applying this rule the appeal in this case was prematurely brought.

Eason Oil Co. v. Howard Engineering, Inc.

61 O.B.A.J. 2540 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1990

The pooled participants rely on Union Oil Co. of California v. Brown, 28 for the *715 proposition that the subsequent despacing order diminished the contractual participants’ right to future production. … Brown, supra note 28 at 1109-1110. 30 . The pooled participants also cite Southern Union Production Co. v.

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Kelly

137 Okla. 22 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1929

Isabelle v. Edding, 119 Okla. 26 , 248 Pac. 871 ; Brown v. Gardner, 108 Okla. 199 , 235 Pac. 534 ; Davis v. DeGeer, 91 Okla. 111 , 216 Pac. 156 , and cases therein cited.