Case law

Cecil v. Board of County Commissioners

10 Okla. 354 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1900

.: Tbis is an appeal from the board of county commissioners of Washita county, to the district court of that county, from an order of the board, declaring, as the result of an election upon the subject, that “stock should … The order of the board of county commissioners was affirmed in the district court, and the case is brought here upon a transcript certified by the clerk of the district court, that “the aboye and foregoing transcript contains

Lowery v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

584 P.2d 720 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1978

The Board denied the license, for reasons to be set out. Lowery appealed Board’s decision to District Court in Washington County. … The court found Board’s decision to be arbitrary and unreasonable, and ordered Board to issue the license. It is from that decision this appeal is taken.

State Board of Dental Examiners v. Pollock

125 Okla. 170 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1927

See rule announced in; State v. Coyle, 7 Okla. Cr. 50 , 122 Pac. 243 ; Ex parte Hunnicutt, 7 Okla. Cr. 213 , 123 Pac. 179 ; Stout v. State ex rel. Caldwell 36 Okla. 744 , 130 Pac. 553 ; Dickinson v. … Perry, 75 Okla. 25 . 1S1 Pac. 504; Ledegar v. Bockhoven, 77 Okla. 58 , 185 Pac. 1097 ; Leach v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 322 , 188 Pac. 118 .

Shadid v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

639 P.2d 1239 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1982

Hines v. Ind. Sch. Dist. No. 50 Grant County, 380 P.2d 943, 946 (Okl.1963). 5 . Brick v. City of Wichita, 195 Kan. 206 , 403 P.2d 964 (1965). 6 . Work v. … Peters v. Hobby, 349 U.S. 331 , 75 S.Ct. 790 , 99 L.Ed. 1129 (1955); Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Central Liquor Co., 421 P.2d 244, 247 (Okl.1966).

Winters v. State Depository Board

460 P.2d 882 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 4, 1969

In City of Wilburton v. King, Atty. … And for a more recent application in this jurisdiction of the rule, see Oklahoma Tax Commission et al. v. Fortinberry Co., Inc., et al. (1949), 201 Okl. 537 , 207 P.2d 301 .

Harrell v. County Election Board

203 Okla. 360 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 4, 1950

He deposited $250 in cash with the board for the purpose of defraying the expense of the recount. … Coe v. State Election Board et al., 203 Okla. 356 , 221 P. 2d 774 , and for the reasons therein stated, was and is sufficient to entitle said petitioner to a recount as prayed for. Writ granted.

Gallion v. Excise Board of Oklahoma County

171 Okla. 76 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1935

, that is, the difference between the surplus that was used by the excise board and the amount of surplus claimed by plaintiff in error, to fill up the shrinkage that occurred in the estimated income from sources other than … Co. v. Myers, 114 Okla. 240 , 248 P. 395 ; C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. Smiley, 142 Okla. 8 , 285 P. 48 ; El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Taylor, 87 Okla. 140 , 209 P. 749 ; In re Chicago, R. I. & P. R.

Bell v. Board of County Commissioners

335 P.2d 633 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1959

We still think that the rule is sound that is laid down in Board of Directors of School Dist. No. 27 of Oklahoma County v. … Board of Excise of Oklahoma County, *636 31 Okl. 553 , 122 P. 520 and Excise Board of Tulsa County v. City of Tulsa, 180 Okl. 248 , 68 P.2d 823 . The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. DAVISON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V.

Box v. State Election Board of Oklahoma

526 P.2d 936 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1974

Johnson v. State Election Board, Okl., 370 P.2d 551 (1962). Stevens v. Union Graded School Dist. … J„ WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and BARNES, SIMMS and DOOLIN, JJ., concur. BERRY and HODGES, JJ., dissent. 1 . Dunham v. Ardery, 43 Okl. 619 , 143 P. 331 (1914) ; Board of Education v.

Barnsdall Refineries, Inc. v. State Board

171 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1935

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization, cause No. 24271, decided Feb. 12, 1935, 170 Okla. 516 , 41 P. (2d) 453 , having disposed of this matter, the appeal is dismissed.

Graybill v. Oklahoma State Board of Education

585 P.2d 1358 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1978

Anyone checking the minutes of the meeting could determine how each of the five members of the board voted, i. e., each member voted for non-renewal. Appellant cites Oldham v. … LAVENDER, V. C.

LEO v. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD

2023 OK 96 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 2023

OSCN Found Document:LEO v. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only LEO v. … The Board members heard argument from each party at the Board meeting prior to the vote.

Simpson v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

409 P.2d 364 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 28, 1965

Board v. … In Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v.

Findley v. State Election Board of Oklahoma

325 P.2d 1037 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 2, 1958

The cases of Meyer v. Jones, 203 Okl. 160 , 219 P.2d 620 and Martin v. … The writ of mandamus is hereby granted requiring the State Election Board to place the name of Max Findley upon the Democratic primary ballot to be held July 1, 1958. CORN, V. C.

Robbins v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

461 P.2d 610 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1969

The decision in Trask v. Johnson, Okl., 452 P.2d 575 , is dispositive of this issue. … Dunlap v. Jeffrey, Okl., 260 P.2d 1072 . Appellants further contend requirements of 75 O.S.Supp.1963 §§ 309 and 320, were not complied with as respects the contents of the record on appeal.

Board of County Com'rs v. Good Twp.

188 Okla. 151 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1940

Herndon v. Board of Com’rs, etc., 158 Okla. 14 , 11 P. 2d 939 . … This, we say, accords with the holding of this court in Foote v.

Shelton v. School Board, Dist. No. 22

43 Okla. 239 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 18, 1914

As was held by this court, in Martin v. McGarr, 27 Okla. 653 , 117 Pac. 323 , 38 L. R. A. (N. … See, also, Ledbetter v. Kimsey, 38 Okla. 671 , 134 Pac. 868 , and Snyder v. Blake, 35 Okla. 294, 129 Pac. 34 .

James v. Board of Com'rs, McCurtain County

103 Okla. 141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1924

On April 6, 1923, it appears that the board of county commissioners authorized the employment of the plaintiff as deputy county treasurer, who testified that he was directed by a member of the board to file his claim for … Dunlap v. Board of County Commissioners, Carter County, 85 Okla. 295 , 205 Pac. 1100 ; City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil and Gas Co., 64 Okla. 214 , 166 Pac. 1058 .

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Naifeh

388 P.2d 855 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1964

Such action by defendant was in direct violation of 37 O.S.1961 § 536, and the rules and regulations promulgated by the Board. In the case of Lightle v. … J., HALLEY, V. C. J., and JOHNSON, JACKSON and IRWIN, JJ., concur.

Kay County, Excise Board v. Davis

187 Okla. 494 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1940

WELCH, V. C. J. In the annual estimate of Kaw City the county excise board inserted and added an item of $1,000 for audit of the books, records, and accounts of Kaw City. … Plaintiff in error does cite City of Ardmore v.