Case law

City of Lawton v. Harkins

34 Okla. 545 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1912

Rep. 465 ; Peters v. Lindsborg, supra; Culver v. Streator, 130 Ill. 238 , 22 N. E. 810 , 6 L. R. A. 270; Pollock v. Louisville, 13 Bush (Ky.) 221 , 26 Am. Rep. 260 ; Cook v. Macon, 54 Ga. 468 ; Harris v. … Atlanta, 62 Ga. 290 ; Dargan v. Mobile, 31 Ala. 469 , 70 Am. Dec. 505 ; Trammell v. Russellville, 34 Ark. 105 , 36 Am. Rep. 1 ; Elliott v. Philadelphia, 75 Pa. 347 , 15 Am. Rep. 591 ; Buttrick v.

STRACK v. CONTINENTAL RESOURCES

2021 OK 21 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 20, 2021

Id . § 2:8, at 106-14; see also Brown v. … BOARD OF COM'RS of HARMON CTY. v. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMN. Discussed at Length 1984 OK 22 , 681 P.2d 754 , Sneed v. Sneed Discussed at Length Title 5.

Glass v. Oklahoma Methodist Home for the Aged, Inc.

502 P.2d 1268 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1972

See Immanuel Baptist Church v. Glass, Okl., 497 P.2d 757 ; Eastwood Baptist Church v. Glass, Okl., 497 P.2d 761 ; Holland Hall School v. Glass, Okl., 497 P.2d 763 . … See, for instance, Oregon Methodist Homes, Inc., v. Horn, 226 Or. 298 , 360 P.2d 293 , in which the claim of tax exemption was denied, and Topeka Presbyterian Manor, Inc., v.

Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Sisters of the Sorrowful Mother

186 Okla. 339 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 1939

Phi Kappa Psi v. State, 175 Okla. 605 , 53 P. 2d 1130 ; Beta Theta Pi v. Board County Com’rs, 108 Okla. 78 , 234 P. 354 . And in Board County Com’rs of Garfield County v. Phillips University, 144 Okla. 57 , 289 P. 720 . … That was one of the controlling factors in Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v.

In re Gypsy Oil Co.

142 Okla. 298 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1929

Coggeshall & Co. v. … This contention is fully covered by our discussion in cause No. 20142, Coggeshall & Co. v.

LAWSON v. LeFLORE CO. DETENTION CENTER PUBLIC TRUST SECURITY COMM.

2025 OK 87 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 2025

OSCN Found Document:LAWSON v. LeFLORE CO. DETENTION CENTER PUBLIC TRUST SECURITY COMM. LAWSON v. LeFLORE CO. … See Lawson v. Sequoyah Cnty. 911 Trust Auth. , 2022 OK CIV APP 39 521 P.3d 827 Lawson v.

Long v. McMahan

205 Okla. 696 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1952

Kenney v. Neumeyer, 171 Okla. 1 , 41 P. 2d 869 ; Saunders v. Firestone, 176 Okla. 135 , 54 P. 2d 1024 ; Hamilton v. Browder, 176 Okla. 229 , 54 P. 2d 1025 ; Biser v. Biser, 176 Okla. 210 , 55 P. 2d 446 ; Jones v. … The rule is also followed in the later cases of Brouse v. Whitney, 130 Okla. 144 , 265 P. 1048 ; News Dispatch Printing & Audit Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Carter County, 132 Okla. 216 , 270 P. 2 .

Vickers v. Philip Carey Co.

49 Okla. 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1915

In McCants v. … In Goldie v.

Finance Corporation v. Modern Materials Company

312 P.2d 455 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 19, 1957

Clark v. Armstrong & Murphy, 180 Okl. 514 , 72 P.2d 362 ; Edmonston v. Holder, supra; Hoffman v. Barnett, supra. … Panther Oil & Gas Co. v. Brown, 170 Okl. 210 , 39 P.2d 150 ; 12 O.S.1951 §§ 268 and 269.

Lanyon v. Byus

81 Okla. 203 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1921

This proposition also- has been decided adversely to counsel in the case of Brown v. … In Roberts v.

Wray v. Howard

79 Okla. 223 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1920

* * * Brown v. Trent, 36 Okla. 239 , 128 Pac. 895 ; Elroy v. Adair, 54 Okla. 207 , 153 Pac. 660 ; Bridges v. Rea, 64 Oklahoma, 166 Pac. 416 ; Brewer v. Dodson, 60 Okla. 81 , 159 Pac. 329 ; Griffin v. … In Lusk et al. v.

Application of Maupin

190 Okla. 27 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1941

CORN, V. C. J. The matter herein presented involves the petition of John A. Maupin for reinstatement as a member of bar of this state. … At that time, upon complaint filed against him before the State Bar, and in conformity with the recommendation of the Board of Governors, this court rendered its decision disbarring petitioner from the further practice of

Sarber v. Marland Oil Co.

147 Okla. 257 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1931

Powers v. Brown, Judge, 122 Okla. 40 , 252 Pac. 27 . … Clinton v. Miller. 96 Okla. 71 . 216 Pac. 135 : Thigpen v. Deutch, 66 Okla. 19 , 166 Pac. 901 ; Brown v. Trent, 36 Okla. 239 , 128 Pac. 895 ; Tiger v. Drumright, 95 Okla. 174 , 217 Pac. 453 , Wolfe v.

State Ex Rel. Stuart v. Rapp

632 P.2d 388 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 21, 1981

Williams v. … Tax Commission v. Mourer, Okl., 596 P.2d 882 (1979).

Matter of Home-Stake Production Co., Etc.

598 P.2d 1193 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 5, 1979

Wood and Samuel V. Shaw. As amended May 8, 1975, the petition alleges that under Article V, § 5.07 of the trust agreement, the defendants, Robert S. Trip-pet and Frank E. … The resolution adopted July 16, 1973, at the Board of Directors meeting gave no reason for the termination.

Shoals v. Freeland

91 Okla. 238 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 10, 1923

In re Standwaitie’s Estate, 73 Oklahoma, 175 Pac. 542 ; Brown v. Thompson, 73 Oklahoma, 175 Pac. 931 . … Neil v. Union National Bank, 72 Oklahoma, 178 Pac. 659 ; Black on Judgments (2nd Ed.) sec. 106; Boynton v. Crockett, 12 Okla. 57 , 69 Pac. 869 ; Hirsh et al. v. Twyford, 40 Okla. 220 , 139 Pac. 313 ; Mooney v.

Anderson v. Tatro

44 Okla. 219 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 10, 1914

Bank v. Lasater, 196 U. S. 115 , 25 Sup. Ct. 206, 49 L. Ed. 408 ; Brown v. Marion Nat. Bank, 169 U. S. 416 , 18 Sup. Ct. 390, 42 L. Ed. 801 ; Driesbach v. Nat. Bank, 104 U. S. 52 , 26 L. Ed. 658 ; Rushing v. … Barnet v. National Bank, 98 U. S. 555 , 25 L. Ed. 212 ; Carter v. Carusi, 112 U. S. 478 , 5 Sup. Ct. 281, 28 L. Ed. 820 ; McBroom v. Scottish Mortgage & Land Investment Co., 153 U. S. 318 , 14 Sup. Ct. 852, 38 L.

Jarman v. Mason

107 Okla. 76 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1924

See Jarman v. Mason, decided by this court on September 16, 1924. 102 Okla. 278 , 229 Pac. 459 ; Lansdon v. State Board (Idaho) 111 Pac. 133 ; State ex rel. Hatfield v. Garrison (Iowa) 190 N. W. 390 ; Bradley v. … Co. v. Odd Fellows Bldg. Co. (Ark.) 158 S. W. 955 ; Commonwealth v. James (Ky.) 128 S. W. 338 ; Polenske v. Ennis (Neb.) 130 N. W. 981 ; Barry v. Wachosky (Neb.) 778 N. W. 1080 ; Lewis v. Elrod, 38 Ala. 17 : State v.

M. & D. Finance Co. v. Methvin

186 Okla. 294 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1939

See Campbell v. Vance, 118 Okla. 283 ; 248 P. 634 ; Myers v. Denison, 104 Okla. 208 , 230 P. 742 ; Pearce v. Moore, 179 Okla. 277 , 65 P. 2d 189 . … Brown, 132 Tenn. 294 , 177 S. W. 1158 ; Rapp v. Mabbett Motor Co., 201 App. Div. 283 , 194 N. Y. S. 200; Consolidated National Bank of Tucson v.

Grisso v. Ellis

194 Okla. 506 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1944

Defendants’ title to the lands rests -upon a resale tax deed, dated May 17, 1938, executed and delivered to the chairman of the board of county commissioners of Grady county and a commissioner’s deed executed and delivered … Our decision herein is based upon our' decision in Bramble et al. v. Caywood, 193 Okla. 668 , 146 P. 2d 587 , and the applicable part of the syllabus in that, case is adopted herein. Affirmed. CORN, C.