Case law

Seran v. Rose

93 Okla. 192 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 3, 1923

Brown v. Chowning, 59 Okla. 278 , 159 Pac. 323 . While the first ground of the motion for new trial is somewhat indefinite, it is specified as error, the rendering of judgment in favor of the lumber company. … In Alberti v.

Application of Maupin

190 Okla. 27 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1941

CORN, V. C. J. The matter herein presented involves the petition of John A. Maupin for reinstatement as a member of bar of this state. … At that time, upon complaint filed against him before the State Bar, and in conformity with the recommendation of the Board of Governors, this court rendered its decision disbarring petitioner from the further practice of

Matter of Del Moral Rodriguez

552 P.2d 397 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1976

While we agree with the United States Supreme Court in Bod-die v. … who is a member of said governing board.

Browne v. Folsom

94 Okla. 286 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1923

the trial court in rendering the judgment upon the plea of intervention of Holley & Means, fixing their fee and establishing the same as a lien against the interest in said land purchased and owned by the defendant Fred Browne … Stumpff, 84 Okla. 187 , 203 Pac. 194 , which has been followed by this court in Callahan v. Nida, 86 Okla. 279 , 207 Pac. 967 , and approved in Stumpff v. Harper, 90 Okla. 195 . 214 Pac. 709 . In the case of Harper v.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Satterfield

135 Okla. 183 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1929

Leavenworth Railroad Co. v. Lowe, supra; Chicago, R. I. & P. Railway Co. v. McGlinn, 114 U. S. 543 , 5 S. Ct. 1005 , 29 L. Ed. 270 ; Benson v. U. S., 146 U. S. 330 , 13 S. Ct. 60 , 36 L. Ed. 994 ; Palmer v. … Sill Military Reservation attached to the city of Lawton school district for school purposes and that the board of education of the city of Law-ton took such action and the Secretary of War gave such consent as is shown by

LeFlore v. Reflections of Tulsa, Inc.

708 P.2d 1068 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1985

Co. v. Brown, supra; McGuigen v. Harris, supra, at 6820. In this case it is clear that the losses appellee incurred were the natural and probable result of appellant’s misrepresentations. … Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Brown, 477 P.2d 67, 70 (Okla.1970); Cooperative Refinery Assn. v. Young, 393 P.2d 537, 540 (Okla.1964). In Oiler v.

Vickers v. Philip Carey Co.

49 Okla. 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1915

In McCants v. … In Goldie v.

OLIVER v. HOFMEISTER

2016 OK 15 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 2016

Gurney, supra. , Board of Educ., Ind. Sch. Dist. No. 52 v. Antone, 1963 OK 165, 384 P.2d 911. … CHILDERS Discussed at Length 1963 OK 165, 384 P.2d 911, BOARD OF EDUC., IND. SCH. DIST. NO. 52 v. ANTONE Discussed 2008 OK 6, 180 P.3d 1191, LIDDELL v.

Hughes v. Thornton

206 Okla. 92 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1952

Webb v. Moran, 186 Okla. 140 , 96 P. 2d 308 . There was competent evidence to support the verdict of the jury and no prejudicial errors of law are shown in the instructions. … Rose v. Oehme, 200 Okla. 207 , 192 P. 2d 641 . Judgment affirmed. This court acknowledges the services of Attorneys Merton Bulla, Mart Brown, and John F.

In Re Initiative Petition No. 317, Etc.

648 P.2d 1207 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 20, 1982

State Election Board of Oklahoma, 318 P.2d 422, 425 (Okl. 1957). See also Williamson v. Carter, 177 Okl. 382 , *1219 59 P.2d 948 (1936) and Simpson v. Hill, 128 Okl. 269 , 263 P. 635, 637 , 56 A.L.R. 706 (1927). … Musick v. State ex rel. Miles, 185 Okl. 140 , 90 P.2d 631 (1939); Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma County, 185 Okl. 342 , 91 P.2d 771 (1939) and Champlin Refining Co. v.

Browne v. Rowsey

181 Okla. 602 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 18, 1938

Parks v. LeFeber, 162 Okla. 265 , 20 P. (2d) 179 ; Parks v. LeFeber, 163 Okla. 6 , 20 P. (2d) 184 ; Parks v. Illinois Life Insurance Co., 176 Okla. 63 , 54 P. (2d) 392 ; Parks v. … In Parks v.

Carpenter v. Carpenter

645 P.2d 476 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 16, 1982

Wilkerson, Okl., 426 P.2d 340, 342 [1967]; Brown v. Greever, Okl., 379 P.2d 689, 691 [1963], . Snow v. Winn, supra note 4 ; Harrison v. Eaves, supra note 4; Kunze v. Wilkerson, supra note 6 ; Brown v. … Lepis v. Lepis, supra note 18 at 51; Martindell v. Martindell, supra note 18 at 355; Traudt v. Traudt, 116 N.J.Eq. 75, 172 A. 749 [1934]; Acheson v. Acheson, 24 N.J.Misc. 133, 46 A.2d 817 [1946], . Lepis v.

McMahan v. Copiah County, Miss

84 Okla. 222 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1921

In Owen v. City of Marion et al. (Iowa) 103 N. … In Denton v.

Evans v. Davis

406 P.2d 975 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1965

Hunzicker v. Pulliam, 168 Okl. 632 , 37 P.2d 417 , 96 A.L.R. 1294 , we quoted with approval the case of Johnston v. New Omaha, etc., Electric Light Co., 86 Neb. 165 , 125 N.W. 153 , and said: “In the case of Johnston v. … Jackson v.

Holmber v. Will

52 Okla. 745 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1915

McGuire v. Bradley, 118 *748 Ill. App. 59.; Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Overman, 21 Ind. App. 516 , 52 N. E. 771 ; T& Poel v. Shutt, 57 Neb. 592 , 78 N. W. 288 ; Fletcher v. Daugherty, 13 Neb. 224 , 13 N. W. 207 ; Jewett v. … McFadden and Brown v. Masters, 11 Okla. 16 , 66 Pac. 284 ; Stone v. American Nat. Bank, 34 Okla. 786 , 127 Pac. 393 . This exact question was passed upon in the case of Bottoms v.

Rampendahl v. Crump

24 Okla. 873 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1909

Rep. 68 ; Lay v. Parsons, 104 Cal. 661 , 38 Pac. 447 ; Kirk v. Rhoads, 46 Cal. 398 ; Taylor v. Bleakley, 55 Kan. 1 , 39 Pac. 1045 , 28 L. R. A. 683, 49 Am. St. Rep. 233 ; Curran v. … Board of County Canvassers, 129 N. Y. 395 , 29 N. E. 327 , 14 L. R. A. 624.

Lawson v. Warren

34 Okla. 94 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1912

Mitford v. Mitford, 9 Ves. 87; Sherrington v. Yates, 12 M. & W. 855; Brown v. Heathcote, 1 Atk. 160; Winsor v. McLellan, 2 Story, 492 [Fed. Cas. No. 17,887] ; Fletcher v. Morey, 2 Story, 555 [Fed. Cas. … Ed. 1207 ]; Brown v. Brabb, 67 Mich. 17, 22-32 [ 34 N. W. 403 , 11 Am. St. Rep. 596 ] ; Jones on Chattel Mortgages, sec. 241.” In Miller v. Savage„ 60 N. J.

Smith v. Westgate Oil Co.

175 Okla. 573 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1936

Western States Oil & Land Co. v. Helms, 143 Okla. 206 , 288 P. 964 . The allegations of a settlement or compromise were sufficient against a general demurrer. … The Supreme Court acknowledges the aid of Attorneys Everett Petry, John V. Bever-idge, and E. E. Hanson in the preparation of this opinion.

California State Life Ins. Co. v. Bailey

176 Okla. 153 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1936

Brown v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co., 52 Okla. 392 , 153 P. 173 . Therein we held, as expressed in the first three paragraphs of the syllabus, as follows: “1. … The plaintiff relies principally upon the case of McMaster v. New York Life Ins. Co., 183 U. S. 25 , 46 L. Ed. 64 .

Langley v. Albert

140 Okla. 176 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1929

Hart v. New State Bank, 58 Okla. 654 , 100 Pac. 605 ; Hubbard v. Meek, 61 Okla. 60 , 160 Pac. 1128 ; Chesnut v. Overholser, 75 Okla. 190 , 182 Pac. 683 ; Hudgens v. State ex rel. … Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co. v. Morris, supra; Brown v. Marks, 45 Okla. 711 , 146 Pac. 707 ; Tracy v. Dennis, 45 Okla. 208 , 145 Pac. 772 . The judgment appealed from in this cause is a several judgment. Mary P.