Case law

Apple v. Hert

122 Okla. 153 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 18, 1927

Counsel cite and refer to the case of Watts v. Board of County Commissioners, 21 Okla. 231 , 95 Pac. 771 . The facts, in that case do not appear to be very fully stated in the opinion. Mr. … Board of County Commissioners supra; appears to be in conflict with that announced in the eases of Cherry v.

GRISHAM v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY

2017 OK 69 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 2017

Cradduck , 2012 OK 80, ¶ 28, 286 P.3d 643 (Notice is a jurisdictional prerequisite to bringing a District Court action under the GTCA.); Brown v. Creek County ex rel. … Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Comm. Discussed at Length 2006 OK 96, 154 P.3d 1240, TALIAFERRO v. SHAHSAVARI Discussed 1996 OK 67, 918 P.2d 73, 67 OBJ 1844, Shanbour v. Hollingsworth Discussed 2007 OK 56, 164 P.3d 1073, BROWN v.

Foust v. Territory of Oklahoma

8 Okla. 541 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1899

Brown v. Volkening, 64 N. Y. 80 : “A possession is something more than a mere right or title, whether to a present or future estate. … (Sullivan v. Sullivan, 66 N. Y. 37 .)

Hadnot v. Shaw

63 O.B.A.J. 442 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1992

Panama Processes v. Cities Service Co., Okl., 796 P.2d 276 , 280 n. 10 (1990); Lowrance v. Patton, Okl., 710 P.2d 108, 110 (1985); McGaha v. Board of Regents of Univ. of Okl, Okl., 691 P.2d 895, 896 (1984); Lemons v. … McCormack v. Oklahoma Pub. Co., Okl., 613 P.2d 737, 739 (1980); Eddy v. Brown, Okl., 715 P.2d 74, 77 (1986). Invasion of privacy is not a common-law tort. It is a fairly recent development introduced by the Restatement.

Oklahoma City Livestock Exchange v. Parkey

193 Okla. 426 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1943

That such exchange is governed and controlled by a Board of Managers selected by constituent members of the Livestock Exchange. … Burrows v. State Industrial Commission, supra; Griffin v. Holland, 191 Okla. 417 , 131 P. 2d 113 ; McKeever Drilling Co. v. Egbert, 170 Okla. 259 , 40 P. 2d 32 ; Tulsa Rig & Reel Mfg. Co. v.

Hawks v. Seay

150 Okla. 160 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1931

The issues of law presented are identical with the issues presented to this court in Wentz v. Dawson, decided May 19, 1931, 149 Okla. 94 , 299 Pac. 493 . … CLARK, V. C. J., and HEFNER, J., absent.

Clemons v. Hampton

191 Okla. 693 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1943

Tharel v. Board of County Com’rs of Creek County, 188 Okla. 184 , 107 P. 2d 542 ; Ivester v. State, 183 Okla. 519 , 83 P. 2d 193 (decided July 26, 1938); notice, also, Peterson v. … Co. v. Carroll, 154 Okla. 244 , 7 P. 2d 440 ; Davis v. Howe, 99 Okla. 118 , 226 P. 316 . No proposition is presented herein urging illegality on any other grounds. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. WELCH, C.

Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of Tulsa

270 P.3d 113 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 2011

Brown v. Patel, 2007 OK 16, ¶ 16 , 157 P.3d 117, 123 . … Chandler U.S.A., Inc. v. Tyree, 2004 OK 16, n. 3 , 87 P.3d 598, 601 . . Brown v. Patel, 2007 OK 16, ¶ 18 , 157 P.3d 117, 125 . . See State of New Mexico v.

Jones v. Hays

147 Okla. 116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1930

In the case of Morrison v. Brown, 26 Okla. 201 , 109 Pac. 237 , the question was presented for determination whether this court should issue a writ of prohibition to prohibit Hon. T. L. … Again, this court in the case Billings Hotel Co. et al. v. City of Enid, 77 Okla. 122 , 180 Pac. 1086 , quoted with approval the language of Mr. Justice Kane in Morrison v.

City of Skiatook v. Carroll

163 Okla. 149 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1933

Town of Norman v. Ince, 8 Okla. 412 , 58 P. 632 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 25 Okla. 760 , 107 P. 662 ; City of Ardmore v. Orr, 35 Okla. 305 , 129 P. 867 , and City of Chickasha v. … Under the rule stated in Brown v.

Elliott v. City of Guthrie

725 P.2d 861 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1986

Blankenship v. Bone, Okl.App., 530 P.2d 578, 580 [1974]; Fischer v. Oklahoma City, supra, and Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. Casteel, Okl., 522 P.2d 608, 612 [1974]. 7 . … to acquire such land or part thereof _ When such lands shall have been so acquired, or when, under such proceedings, the right to enter upon such lands shall exist, ...’" the Board shall use the remaining monies as may be

Waldrep v. Moses

187 Okla. 475 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1940

WELCH, V. C. J. (dissenting). … Ledbetter, Sheriff, v. Pitts, 137 Okla. 59 , 277 P. 2d 918 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Excise Board, 168 Okla. 519 , 34 P. 2d 274 ; Oklahoma City v. Grigsby, 171 Okla. 23 , 41 P. 2d 697 ; Cooper v.

Sinclair Pipe Line Co. v. State Industrial Commission

134 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 24, 1928

Coulter v. Continental Oil Co., 130 Okla 199, 266 Pac. 463 ; Okla.-Ark. Telephone Co. v. Fries, supra. … J., MASON, V. C. J., and HARRISON, LESTER, CLARK, and HEFNER, JJ., concur.

In Re the Estate of Cutsinger

445 P.2d 778 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1968

(In re Me-hun-kah’s Estate, 78 Okl. 214 , 189 P. 867 , Ward et al. v. … In re Me-hun-kah’s Estate and Ward et al. v. Board of County Commissioners, supra.

White v. Hooker

47 Okla. 453 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1915

White, Plaintiff, v. W. S. … Marvel v. White, 5 Okla. 739 , 50 Pac. 87 ; Board of County Com’rs v. Oxley, 8 Okla. 502 , 58 Pac. 651 ; McMasters v. English et al., 26 Okla. 818 , 110 Pac. 1070 . The appeal is dismissed. All the Justices concur.

Whittington v. City of Ardmore

181 Okla. 286 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1937

Roper v. Board of Education, 167 Okla. 382 , 29 P. (2d) 950 ; Drummond v. Jeffrey, 179 Okla,. 409, 65 P. (2d) 1212 ; Hudson v. Moore, 169 Okla. 12 , 35 P. (2d) 886 . The appeal is dismissed. OSBORN, C. J., BATLESS, Y.

Prudential Property & Casualty Co. v. Grimes

725 P.2d 1246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1986

In Green v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln Co., 126 Okl. 300 , 259 P. 635 (1927) the commissioners by resolution and notice called an election at which county bonds for road improvements could be voted. … V, § 54, Okl.

Archerd v. Ware

115 Okla. 100 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1925

Stinchcomb v. Myers, 28 Okla. 597 , 115 Pac 602 ; Kee v. Park, 32 Okla. 302 , 122 Pac. 712 ; Board Com’rs of Beaver Co. v. Langston, 41 Okla. 715 , 139 Pac. 956 ; Commercial Nat. Bank v. … Trumbly, 56 Okla. 173 , 155 Pac. 874 ; Aaron v. American Nat. Bank, 60 Okla. 137 , 159 Pac. 246 .

Maggert v. Keele

20 Okla. 681 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1908

In Healey v. … In the case of Board of Commissioners of Wilson County v.

Elwood Oil & Gas Co. v. McCoy

72 Okla. 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1919

Vandenberg, 29 Okla. 583 , 119 Pac. 224 ; Letcher v. Maloney et al., 70 Okla. 65 , 172 Pac. 972 : United States v. Behan, 110 U. S. 339 , 4 Sup. Ct. 81, 28 L. Ed. 168 ; Thompon et al. v. … Brown et ux., 106 Iowa, 367 , 76 N. W. 819 .