Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

3.25s

  • Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. Dunham

    167 Okla. 180 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 1934

    In the case of Blue v. … To the same effect are the cases of Chesnut & Smith v. Lynch, 84 Okla. 199 , 202 P. 1018 , Carignano v. Box, 97 Okla. 184 , 223 P. 673 . In the ease of Jennings v. Jennings, 95 Okla. 90 , 218 P. 703 , Mr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Hays

    147 Okla. 116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1930

    In the case of Morrison v. Brown, 26 Okla. 201 , 109 Pac. 237 , the question was presented for determination whether this court should issue a writ of prohibition to prohibit Hon. T. L. … Again, this court in the case Billings Hotel Co. et al. v. City of Enid, 77 Okla. 122 , 180 Pac. 1086 , quoted with approval the language of Mr. Justice Kane in Morrison v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clements v. Jackson Oil & Gas Co.

    62 Okla. 66 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1916

    Florence Mining Co. v. Brown, 124 U. S. 385 , 8 Sup. Ct. 531, 31 L. Ed. 424 . For these reasons we are of opinion that the contract of guaranty was supported by a sufficient consideration. … As was said in Lamm & Co. v. Colcord, 22 Okla. 493 , 98 Pac. 355 , 19 L. R. A. (N.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. Hood

    189 Okla. 580 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 4, 1941

    In Tomson v. Lerner, 37 N. … J., CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, GIBSON, DAVISON, HURST, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. BAYLESS, J., absent.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Comar Oil Co. v. Sipe

    133 Okla. 222 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1928

    Counsel rely upon the following eases: Alfrey v. Colbert. 44 Okla. 246 , 144 Pac. 179 ; Norton v. Kelley, 57 Okla. 222 , 156 Pac. 1164 ; Cressler v. Brown, 79 Okla. 170 , 192 Pac. 417 ; Baker v. … Northup v. Eakes, 72 Okla. 66 , 178 Pac. 266 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Stuard v. First State Bank of Waurika

    88 Okla. 89 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1923

    Rose v. Woldert Gro. Co., 54 Okla. 566 , 154 Pac. 531 ; Smith v. Rockett et al., 79 Okla. 244 , 192 Pac. 691 ; Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Kinney, 79 Okla. 206 , 192 Pac. 586 ; Oklahoma Hospital v. … Brown, 87 Okla. 46 , 208 Pac. 785 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Clemons v. Hampton

    191 Okla. 693 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1943

    Tharel v. Board of County Com’rs of Creek County, 188 Okla. 184 , 107 P. 2d 542 ; Ivester v. State, 183 Okla. 519 , 83 P. 2d 193 (decided July 26, 1938); notice, also, Peterson v. … Co. v. Carroll, 154 Okla. 244 , 7 P. 2d 440 ; Davis v. Howe, 99 Okla. 118 , 226 P. 316 . No proposition is presented herein urging illegality on any other grounds. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. WELCH, C.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Elliott v. City of Guthrie

    725 P.2d 861 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1986

    Blankenship v. Bone, Okl.App., 530 P.2d 578, 580 [1974]; Fischer v. Oklahoma City, supra, and Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. Casteel, Okl., 522 P.2d 608, 612 [1974]. 7 . … to acquire such land or part thereof _ When such lands shall have been so acquired, or when, under such proceedings, the right to enter upon such lands shall exist, ...’" the Board shall use the remaining monies as may be

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • In Re the Estate of Cutsinger

    445 P.2d 778 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1968

    (In re Me-hun-kah’s Estate, 78 Okl. 214 , 189 P. 867 , Ward et al. v. … In re Me-hun-kah’s Estate and Ward et al. v. Board of County Commissioners, supra.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Foust v. Territory of Oklahoma

    8 Okla. 541 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1899

    Brown v. Volkening, 64 N. Y. 80 : “A possession is something more than a mere right or title, whether to a present or future estate. … (Sullivan v. Sullivan, 66 N. Y. 37 .)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

    151 Okla. 60 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1931

    appropriated by the excise board in the general fund under the subhead of ‘capital outlay’ for ‘additions and betterments’; and said item of protest as to the remainder thereof involved herein shall be by the court dismissed … CLARK, V. C. J., and HEFNER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, Mc-NEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., absent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Archerd v. Ware

    115 Okla. 100 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1925

    Stinchcomb v. Myers, 28 Okla. 597 , 115 Pac 602 ; Kee v. Park, 32 Okla. 302 , 122 Pac. 712 ; Board Com’rs of Beaver Co. v. Langston, 41 Okla. 715 , 139 Pac. 956 ; Commercial Nat. Bank v. … Trumbly, 56 Okla. 173 , 155 Pac. 874 ; Aaron v. American Nat. Bank, 60 Okla. 137 , 159 Pac. 246 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Consolidated School Dist. No. 73 v. Ellison

    119 Okla. 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 20, 1926

    Foreman v. Needles, 78 Okla. 105 , 188 Pac. 1087 ; Lamb v. Bennett, 81 Okla. 41 , 196 Pac. 543 ; Armstrong v. Phillips, 82 Okla. 82 , 198 Pac. 499 ; Gayer v. Pearce, 86 Okla. 102 , 206 Pac. 822 ; Gaines Brothers v. … See Ryan v. Humphries, 50 Okla. 343 , 150 Pac. 1106 ; Stewart v. Board of Education, 104 Okla. 141 , 230 Pac. 504 ; Hill v. City of Indianapolis (C. C.) 92 Fed. 467 ; Daviess County v. Dickinson, 117 U. S. 657 , 6 Supt.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ellington v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Tulsa

    717 P.2d 109 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 1, 1986

    In Thompson v. … Van Hoy v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Lefors v. Miami Building & Loan Assn

    183 Okla. 410 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1938

    In the case of McNinch v. … BATLESS, V. O. J., and RILET, PHELPS, CORN. GIBSON, and HURST, JJ. concur. OSBORN, C. J., and DAVISON, J., absent.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BURTON

    482 P.3d 739 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 2021

    OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. … (Brown) to represent her in her personal capacity and later terminated the Respondent. 115 In June 2017, Brown contacted the Respondent and asked whether he had obtained court approval for his attorney fees.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Eli v. Carter Oil Co.

    126 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 1927

    Oil Co. v. … Marsh (Ky.) 229; Drake’s Administrator v. Vaughn, 6; J. J. Marsh (Ky.) 147; Buckinghouse v. Gregg, 19 Ind. 401 ; Milk v. Kent, 60 Ind, 231; Page v. Bartlett, 101 Ala. 193 ; Jones v. Rountree, 96 Ga. 230 ; McBain v.

    Overruled by Carter Oil Co. v. Eli, 164 Okla. 273 (1932)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Regier v. Hutchins

    298 P.2d 777 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1956

    Co. v. Brown, 41 Okl. 70 , 136 P. 1117 , 50 L.R.A.,N.S., 1124, apparently for the, proposition that such cost is not the correct measure of damages in a case like the present one. … Co. v. Brown, supra, if at all erroneous, Was harmless.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Maggert v. Keele

    20 Okla. 681 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1908

    In Healey v. … In the case of Board of Commissioners of Wilson County v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • City of Blackwell v. Cross

    22 Okla. 748 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 1, 1908

    The fourth paragraph directs that the returns of the vote cast at any such election shall be made by the board of canvassers to the Governor who shall declare the result and cause the will of the electors to be carried into … Kelley v. Bonnell, 119 Ind. 494 , 21 N. E. 1101 ; Board of Commissioners of Public School of Allegany County v. County Commissioners of Allegany County, 20 Md. 449 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.