Case law

Anderson v. Barr

178 Okla. 508 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1936

Wiswell v. Giroux (Colo.) 197 P. 759 ; Sawyer v. Bahnsen, 102 Okla. 41 , 226 P. 344 ; Hays v. Smith, 65 Okla. 113 , 164 P. 470 ; Lee v. … Co. v. Rider, 171 Okla. 262 , 42 P. (2d) 842 ; Unger v. Shull, 154 Okla. 277 , 7 P. (2d) 881 ; First Nat. Bank v. Hendrick, 135 Okla. 260 , 275 P. 314 .

Compsource Mut. Ins. Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

435 P.3d 90 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 2018

Torres v. Seaboard Foods , LLC, 2016 OK 20 , ¶ 11, n. 8, 373 P.3d 1057 , 1065, citing Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing Home , 2005 OK 27 , ¶ 9, 130 P.3d 213 , 219. Brown v. … See also Mustang Run Wind Project, LLC v. Osage County Board of Adjustment , 2016 OK 113 , n. 40, 387 P.3d 333 (discussing the arbitrary exercise of government power). Cf . Crider v.

Freeman v. Wilson

105 Okla. 87 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1924

However, this question is no longer open in this court, having- been settled in the decision in the case of Garland v. Zebold, 98 Okla. 6 , 223 Pac. 682 . … See Ryus v. Gruble, 31 Kan. 767 , 3 Pac. 518 ; also Board of County Commissioners v. Van Slyck, 52 Kan. 622 , 35 Pac. 299 .

STRACK v. CONTINENTAL RESOURCES

2021 OK 21 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 20, 2021

Id . § 2:8, at 106-14; see also Brown v. … BOARD OF COM'RS of HARMON CTY. v. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMN. Discussed at Length 1984 OK 22 , 681 P.2d 754 , Sneed v. Sneed Discussed at Length Title 5.

Glass v. Oklahoma Methodist Home for the Aged, Inc.

502 P.2d 1268 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1972

See Immanuel Baptist Church v. Glass, Okl., 497 P.2d 757 ; Eastwood Baptist Church v. Glass, Okl., 497 P.2d 761 ; Holland Hall School v. Glass, Okl., 497 P.2d 763 . … See, for instance, Oregon Methodist Homes, Inc., v. Horn, 226 Or. 298 , 360 P.2d 293 , in which the claim of tax exemption was denied, and Topeka Presbyterian Manor, Inc., v.

Williams v. Cook

261 P.2d 611 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 15, 1953

Plaintiff cites and relies on Love v. Schmidt, 26 Okl. 648 , 110 P. 665 , 31 L.R.A., N.S., 1162; Masters v. Teller, 7 Okl. 668 , 56 P. 1067 ; Brown v. O’Neal, Sheriff, 95 Cal. 262 , 30 P. 538 ; Lake v. … In Sankey, Sheriff v.

Riverside Oil & Refining Co. v. Lynch

114 Okla. 198 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 7, 1925

V. … The court rendered judgment appointing V. V.

Welles v. Acree Motor Co.

188 Okla. 173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1940

Smith v. Harrington, supra; Christie v. Scott, supra, and Central Iowa Motor Co. v. Clancey, supra. In the note to National Cash Register Co. v. … See Smith v. Harrington, supra, and note to same, 43 A.L.R. p. 1243; 83 A.L.R. note p. 963; 25 A.L.R. note p. 1490; General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Brown (Cal.) 38 P. 2d 482 ; A. & H. Finance Corp. v. Goldman, supra.

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Whitefield

70 Okla. 26 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1918

Co. v. Lefevre (Tex. Civ. App.) 40 S. W. 340 ; Hall v. … Co. v. Zickafoose, 39 Okla. 302 , 135 Pac. 406 ; St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v.

Sharp v. Jackson

344 P.2d 592 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1959

In Brown v. … See also Frates v. Whitson, 195 Okl. 129 , 155 P.2d 536 ; Culbertson v. Trope, 194 Okl. 146 , 148 P.2d 159 ; Herndon v. Pigg, 190 Okl. 403 , 124 P.2d 425 ; Rorem v. Mercer, 205 Okl. 395 , 238 P.2d 330 , and Parks v.

Harman v. Burt

20 Okla. 509 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1908

. ■ An interesting case wherein the principle herein involved was raised is a case from North Carolina (Kidd v. Morrison, 62 N. C. 31 ), filed in the lower court in 1861, involving the title to *511 a slave. … See, also, Mills v. Green, 159 U. S. 651 , 16 Sup. Ct. 132, 40 L. Ed. 293 ; Colvard v. Board of Commissioners of Graham County, 95 N. C. 515 . This court has also held, in the case of W. A. Parker et al. v.

Barricklow v. Boice

50 Okla. 260 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 20, 1915

Inman Manufacturing Company v. American Cereal Company, 133 Iowa, 71 , 110 N. W. 287 , 8 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1140, 12 Ann. Cas. 387. … (Chicago Auditorium Association v. Corporation of Fine Arts Building, 244 Ill. 532 , 91 N. E. 665 , 18 Ann. Cas. 253.)

State Ex Rel. City of Tulsa v. Mayes

174 Okla. 286 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1935

Owen v. City of Tulsa, 27 Okla. 264 , 111 P. 320 ; City of St. Louis v. Western U. Tel. Co., 149 U. S. 465 ; State ex rel. v. Linn, 49 Okla. 526 , 153 P. 826 . … Treas., v. City and County of Denver (Colo.) 202 P. 1085 ; Omaha v. Douglas County, 96 Neb. 865 , 148 N. W. 938 ; City of Colorado Springs v. Bd. of Com’rs of Fremont County (Colo.) 84 P. 1113 ; City of Springville v.

City of Ada v. Criswell

185 Okla. 517 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1939

In Wright, Receiver, v. … Armstrong v. City of Tulsa, supra: Purcell v. City of Chicago, 231 Ill. 164 , 83 N. E. 337 ; Brush v. City of New York, 69 N. Y. Supp. 51 .”

Whiteacre v. Nichols

17 Okla. 387 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 6, 1906

Grimes v. Cullison, 3 Okla. *391 268; Ward v. Clay, 23 Pac. 50 ; Budd v. Cramer, 14 Kans. 101 ; State v. School District No. 3, 34 Kans. 237 , 8 Pac. 208 . … Wilkins v. Moore, 20 Kans. 538 ; Chaffee v. Browne, 109 Calif. 211, 41 Pac. 1028 ; Baldwin v. Boyce (Ind. Sup.) 51 N. W. 334 ; Johnson v. Anderson, 60 Kans. 578 , 57 Pac. 513 .

Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. Dunham

167 Okla. 180 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 1934

In the case of Blue v. … To the same effect are the cases of Chesnut & Smith v. Lynch, 84 Okla. 199 , 202 P. 1018 , Carignano v. Box, 97 Okla. 184 , 223 P. 673 . In the ease of Jennings v. Jennings, 95 Okla. 90 , 218 P. 703 , Mr.

Campbell v. Edinger

607 P.2d 697 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1980

Chicago Land Clearance Commission v. Darrow, 12 I11.2d 365, 146 N.E.2d 1 (1957); Towson v. Texas Electric Service Company, 371 S.W.2d 581 (Tex.Civ.App.1963); St. Peters Roman Catholic Parrish v. … McClung v. Cullison, 15 Okl. 402 , 82 P. 499 (1905) and Browne v. Rowsey, 181 Okl. 602 , 75 P.2d 432 (1938) holding heirs not necessary parties in foreclosure actions. . State ex rel. Department of Highways v.

Jones v. Hays

147 Okla. 116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1930

In the case of Morrison v. Brown, 26 Okla. 201 , 109 Pac. 237 , the question was presented for determination whether this court should issue a writ of prohibition to prohibit Hon. T. L. … Again, this court in the case Billings Hotel Co. et al. v. City of Enid, 77 Okla. 122 , 180 Pac. 1086 , quoted with approval the language of Mr. Justice Kane in Morrison v.

Smith v. Cornwell & Chowning Lbr. Co.

101 Okla. 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1923

Meyer v. White, 27 Okla. 400 , 112 Pac. 1005 . The defendant next contends .that the court erred in giving instruction No. O. … In Mounts v.

Clements v. Jackson Oil & Gas Co.

62 Okla. 66 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1916

Florence Mining Co. v. Brown, 124 U. S. 385 , 8 Sup. Ct. 531, 31 L. Ed. 424 . For these reasons we are of opinion that the contract of guaranty was supported by a sufficient consideration. … As was said in Lamm & Co. v. Colcord, 22 Okla. 493 , 98 Pac. 355 , 19 L. R. A. (N.