Case law

McIllwain v. Bills

206 Okla. 238 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 1, 1952

HALLEY, V. C. J. … He cites in support of this proposition Taliaferro v. Reirdon, 191 Okla. 43 , 126 P. 2d 696 ; McCleary v. Brown, 190 Okla. 19 , 119 P. 2d 830 ; Neustadt, Ex’r, v. Daube, 190 Okla. 694 , 126 P. 2d 999 ; and 54 O.

Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

151 Okla. 60 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1931

appropriated by the excise board in the general fund under the subhead of ‘capital outlay’ for ‘additions and betterments’; and said item of protest as to the remainder thereof involved herein shall be by the court dismissed … CLARK, V. C. J., and HEFNER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, Mc-NEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., absent.

Colbert v. Roodhouse

279 P.2d 349 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1954

Marcy v. Board of Com’rs of Seminole County, 45 Okl. 1 , 144 P. 611 ; Board of Com’rs of Marshall County v. U. S., 10 Cir., 152 F.2d 540 ; United States v. … Board of Com’rs of Marshall County v. U.

Stringer v. Ross

186 Okla. 701 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1940

Specht, 83 Okla. 31 , 200 P. 211 ; Cox v. Bowles, 124 Okla. 117 , 254 P. 101 ; State v. … of Education v.

Hadnot v. Shaw

63 O.B.A.J. 442 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1992

Panama Processes v. Cities Service Co., Okl., 796 P.2d 276 , 280 n. 10 (1990); Lowrance v. Patton, Okl., 710 P.2d 108, 110 (1985); McGaha v. Board of Regents of Univ. of Okl, Okl., 691 P.2d 895, 896 (1984); Lemons v. … McCormack v. Oklahoma Pub. Co., Okl., 613 P.2d 737, 739 (1980); Eddy v. Brown, Okl., 715 P.2d 74, 77 (1986). Invasion of privacy is not a common-law tort. It is a fairly recent development introduced by the Restatement.

Bonney v. Smith

191 Okla. 622 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1942

McCauley v. State, 162 Okla. 153 , 19 P. 2d 561 ; Roper v. Board of Education of City of Okmulgee, 167 Okla. 382 , 29 P. 2d 950 ; State ex rel. Rives v. Halley, 167 Okla. 504 , 30 P. 2d 915 . … J., CORN, V. C. J., and OSBORN, GIBSON, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY and BAYLESS, JJ., absent.

Phelps v. Childers

184 Okla. 421 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1939

In Excise Board v. Chicago, Rock Island Pacific Ry. … In the case of Board of Commissioners, Creek County, v.

Baldwin v. City of Lawton

198 Okla. 585 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1947

Southern Surety Co. v. … Village of Norwood v. Baker, 172 U.S. 269 , 43 L. Ed. 443 ; Fidelity Nat. Bank & Trust Co. et al. v. Swope et al., 2 F. 2d 676 ; Martin v. District of Columbia, 205 U.S. 135 , 51 L.

Jenkins v. Pappas

383 P.2d 645 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 1963

We said in National Union Oil and Gas Company v. Richard, 164 Okl. 13 , 22 P.2d 88, 93 , and again in Defenbaugh v. … Jones v. Sinclair Crude Oil Purchasing Co. et al., 130 Okl. 182 , 266 P. 439 . See also Wammack v. Jones, 103 Okl. 1 , 229 P. 159 .

Yeager v. Jackson

162 Okla. 207 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 7, 1933

Parker, 35 Okla. 74 , 128 P. 101 ; Horton v. Birdson, 35 Okla. 275 , 129 P. 701 ; Colonial Jewelry Co. v. Brown, 38 Okla. 44 , 131 P. 1077 ; Rutherford v. Holbert, 42 Okla. 735 , 142 P. 1099 ; Adams v. … Thurmond, 48 Okla. 189 , 149 P. 1141 ; Williamson v. Scully, 52 Okla. 531 , 152 P. 839 ; Hoard, Jr., Co. v. Grand Rapids Showcase Co., 74 Okla. 111 , 173 P. 844 ; Commercial National Bank v.

Medlin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

195 Okla. 359 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1945

V. Code of Fed. Reg., Part 541, page 8603, (1942 WH Man 804) and are as follows: “Sec. 541. 1—Executive. … Pure Oil Co. v. Gear et al., 183 Okla. 489 , 83 P. 2d 389 .

McCammon v. Jenkins

44 Okla. 612 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1915

Cockrell, 20 Tex. 96 ; Cross v. Everts, 28 Tex. 523 ; Mills v. Von Boskirk, 32 Tex. 360 . The case of Ross v. Hellyer (C. … Board of County Commissioners of Woodward Co. v. Thyfault., 41 Okla. 82 , 141 Pac. 409 ; Alfred v. St. L., I. M. & S. Ry. Co., 42 Okla. 4 , 140 Pac. 415 ; Elwell v. Purcell, 42 Okla. 1 , 140 Pac. 412 .

Bounds v. Gooch

92 Okla. 260 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1923

Gibson v. Rappole, 86 Okla. 100 , 206 Pac. 825 ; Bouten v. Carson, 51 Okla. 579 , 152 Pac. 131 ; Carpenter v. Roach, 55 Okla. 103 , 155 Pac. 237 ; Primous v. Wertz. 65 Okla. 7 , 162 Pac. 481 ; Buel, Pryor & Daniel v. … Co. 65 Okla. 108 , 163 Pac. 536 ; Brown v. Tull, 65 Okla. 119 , 164 Pac. 785 ; J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. Coombs, 66 Okla. 126 , 166 Pac. 1072 ; Brisley v. Mahaffey, 64 Okla. 319 , 167 Pac. 984 ; Shawnee Natl. Bank v.

State Ex Rel. Wells v. Cline

29 Okla. 157 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1911

He further alleges that on the same day the board of county commissioners made an order by which they appointed relator clerk of said court, and that the said J. R. … McCahon v. County of Leavenworth, 8 Kan. 438 ; Braidy v. Theritt, 17 Kan. 468 ; Hallgreen v. Campbell, 82 Mich. 255 , 46 N. W. 381 , 9 L. R. A. 408, 21 Am. St. Rep. 557 .

Modern Builders, Inc. v. Building Inspector of Tulsa

197 Okla. 80 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1946

After said board upheld the action of the building inspector, plaintiff appealed to the district court. … See Landay v. MacWilliams, 173 Md. 460 , 196 Atl. 293 , 114 A. L. R. 984. No practical support for defendant’s position is contained in Howard v. Mahoney, 188 Okla. 89 , 106 P. 2d 267 , cited by both parties.

Holt v. Aetna Bldg. Loan Association

78 Okla. 307 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1920

Aetna Bldg. & Loan Ass’n v. Rouch, supra; Midland Sav. & Loan Co. v. Deaton, supra; Midland Sav. & Loan Co. v. Summers, supra; Washington, etc., Co. v. Stanley, supra. … Midland Sav. & Loan Co. v. Deaton, supra; Midland Sav. & Loan Co. v. Summers, supra; Meroney v. Atlanta Bldg. & Loan Ass’n, supra.

Clark v. First Baptist Church

570 P.2d 327 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1977

Co. v. Palmer, Okl., 389 P.2d 495 ; Hillcrest Hospital v. State Industrial Court, Okl., 452 P.2d 781 . … Brown & Sons, Inc. v. Savage, 208 Okl. 668 , 258 P.2d 183 , it is inequitable and unjust to punish claimant by denying coverage under the insurer’s policy.

In Re the Estate of Cutsinger

445 P.2d 778 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1968

(In re Me-hun-kah’s Estate, 78 Okl. 214 , 189 P. 867 , Ward et al. v. … In re Me-hun-kah’s Estate and Ward et al. v. Board of County Commissioners, supra.

Freeman v. Wilson

105 Okla. 87 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1924

However, this question is no longer open in this court, having- been settled in the decision in the case of Garland v. Zebold, 98 Okla. 6 , 223 Pac. 682 . … See Ryus v. Gruble, 31 Kan. 767 , 3 Pac. 518 ; also Board of County Commissioners v. Van Slyck, 52 Kan. 622 , 35 Pac. 299 .

Hildebrand v. Harrison

288 P.2d 399 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1955

Freeman, 56 Kan. 463 , 43 P. 772 ; Byrne v. Reed, 75 Cal. 277 , 17 P. 201 ; Brown v. Potter, 13 Colo.App. 512 , 58 P. 785 ; Bank of Hendersonville v. Dozier, 24 Tenn.App. 178 , 142 S.W.2d 191 ; Frost v. … Rosencrans, 66 Iowa 405 , 23 N.W. 895 ; Angell v. Pickard, 61 Mich. 561 , 28 N.W. 680 ; Finch v. Kent, 24 Mont. 268 , 61 P. 653 ; Campbell v. Holland, 22 Neb. 587 , 35 N.W. 871 ; Durfee v.