Case law

Vickers v. Horster

451 P.2d 7 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1969

In Logan v. … See Whitaker v. Town of Tipton, Okl., 426 P.2d 336 , and King v. Gant, 77 Okl. 105 , 186 P. 960 .

City of Tulsa v. Malloy

104 Okla. 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 2, 1924

certain invoices, and to the police department to the amount of $437.92, and to the health department to the amount of $60, and claimed that the same was past due, and that payment had been disallowed by the mayor and the board … This proposition has been determined by this court in the case of United States Rubber Co. v. City of Tulsa, 103 Okla. 163 , 229 Pac. 771 .

Protest of Blaine

149 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1931

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Tax Review denying the protest of Charles Blaine et al. against alleged illegal and excessive tax levies for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1928, made by the county excise board … CLARK, V. C. J., and RILEY, HEFNER, OULLISON, SWINDALL, and McNEILL, JJ., concur. LESTER, C. J., and LANGLEY, J., absent.

Wilkerson v. Grand River Dam Authority

195 Okla. 678 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 1945

Board of County Commissioners, 70 Okla. 305 , 174 P. 523 , and while correct as an abstract proposition of law, had no application to the issue which the jury was called upon to determine. … Deféndant contends that this is contarary to the rule announced in Watkins v. Board of County Commissioners, supra. The contention is without merit.

Murphy v. Eldridge

201 Okla. 501 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1948

Thus, in Herrin v. … State Dry Cleaners Board, 192 Okla. 251 , 135 P. 2d 332 , a case which did not involve price fixing, but required dry cleaners to pay license fees, and authorized the Board to regulate the conduct of the business in other

School District No. 51 v. Trotter

10 Okla. 625 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1901

(Board of County Commissioners v. Wright, 8 Okla. 190 ; Custer County v. De Lana, 8 Okla. 213 ; Devine et al. v. Silvers, 8 Okla. 700 ; Pierce v. Engelkemeier, 61 Pac. 1047 .)

Hildebrand v. Harrison

288 P.2d 399 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1955

Freeman, 56 Kan. 463 , 43 P. 772 ; Byrne v. Reed, 75 Cal. 277 , 17 P. 201 ; Brown v. Potter, 13 Colo.App. 512 , 58 P. 785 ; Bank of Hendersonville v. Dozier, 24 Tenn.App. 178 , 142 S.W.2d 191 ; Frost v. … Rosencrans, 66 Iowa 405 , 23 N.W. 895 ; Angell v. Pickard, 61 Mich. 561 , 28 N.W. 680 ; Finch v. Kent, 24 Mont. 268 , 61 P. 653 ; Campbell v. Holland, 22 Neb. 587 , 35 N.W. 871 ; Durfee v.

Crown Drug Company v. McBride

303 P.2d 970 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 19, 1956

Corporation, Ltd. v. Thompson, 101 Okl. 138 , 223 P. 666 . Rich v. … In the case of Danner v.

Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Wirthle

73 Okla. 302 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1918

Brown, its secretary and treasurer, and who had been such from 1905 up to the date of the trial. … Co. v.

State v. Davenport

79 Okla. 297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1920

. *298 One of the cardinal rules applied in the construction of statutes is stated in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Creek Co. v. … Lesher (Cal.) 32 Pac. 449 ; Ponting v. Isaman (Idaho) 62 Pac. 680 ; Corker v. Pence (Idaho) 85 Pac. 388 ; McRoberts v. Hoar (Idaho) 152 Pac. 1046 ; State v. Richardson (N. D.) 109 N. W. 1026 .

Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. French

368 P.2d 652 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 28, 1961

Co. v. Nickels, Okl., 343 P.2d 1094 ; Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Ry. Co. v. Painter, Okl., 333 P.2d 547 ; Thompson v. … Rush v. Brown, 187 Okl. 97 , 101 P.2d 262 . The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. WILLIAMS, C. J., and DAVISON, IRWIN and BERRY, JJ., concur. BLACKBIRD, V. C. J., and HALLEY and JOHNSON, JJ., dissent.

Abraham v. Roland Oil Co.

135 Okla. 43 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1929

And, also, Cherry v. Brown, 79 Okla. 215 , 192 Pac. 227 . They also refer to Bankard v. Gibson, 109 Okla. 124 , 233 Pac. 1069 , Farmer v. State. 5 Okla. Cr. 151 , 114 Pac. 753 , Jordon v. State, 6 Okla. … Brown, 79 Okla. 215 , 192 Pac. 227 , and Oklahoma Union Ry. Co. v. Dascus, 133 Okla. 83 , 271 Pac. 242 , sustain in principle the trial court, for which reasons the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Tulsa Stockyards Co. v. Moore

184 Okla. 6 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1938

The fences on either r-ide were made of wooden planks or boards, two inches by six inches, and there was a space of several inches between boards. On her right, or" the west sid“ of the main alleyway, were many gates. … V. C. J., and RILEY. WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ., concur. OSBORN, C. J, and DAVISON. J., absent.

FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE v. CITY OF NORMAN

489 P.3d 20 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 2021

FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE v. … In Andrews v.

Gardner Petroleum Co. v. Poe

166 Okla. 169 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1933

Gypsy Oil Co. v. Jackson, 158 Okla. 139 , 12 P. (2d) 694 ; Earl W. Baker, Inc., v. Maples, 155 Okla. 105 , 8 P. (2d) 46 ; Tulsa Gas Producing Co. v. … Corp. v. Beatty, 45 Ga. App. 104 , 163 S. E. 302, 303 ; Combination Drilling Co. v. Wiggs, 163 Okla. 88 , 20 P. (2d) 901 .

Bristow Battery Co. v. Payne

123 Okla. 137 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 20, 1926

Payne v. Ross, 95 Okla. 273 , 219 Pac. 144 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. McIntosh, 103 Okla. 246 , 229 Pac. 1064 . … Co. v. Amend, 44 Okla. 602 , 145 Pac. 1117 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Haworth, 48 Okla. 132 , 149 Pac. 1086 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Thompson, 35 Okla. 138 , 128 Pac. 685 ; El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v.

Gingles v. State ex rel. Central State Griffin Memorial Hospital

749 P.2d 105 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1988

I-95 v. Swanson, 548 P.2d 215 (Okl.1976); Schrom v. Okla. Industrial Development, 536 P.2d 904 (Okl.1975). … Defendant Tash is alleged to have violated the personnel policies of the Hospital and the State, but it is undisputed that Merit Board Rule 1420(13) was in effect at the time. It is clear that under the Neal v.

Central Surety & Ins. Corp. v. State Industrial Commission

180 Okla. 383 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1937

See, also, Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v. Mathews, 162 Okla. 283 , 20 P. (2d) 141 ; Spivey & McGill v. Nixon, 163 Okla. 278 , 21 P. (2d) 1049 ; Missouri, K. & O. Coach Lines v. … Smith Aircraft Co. v. State *385 Industrial Commission, 151 Okla. 67 , 1 P. (2d) 682 ; Lee Way Stage Lines v. Simmons, 166 Okla. 203 , 26 P. (2d) 905 ; Harbour-Longmire-Pace Co. v.

Dodd, Mead & Co. v. Union Graded School District No. 1.

165 Okla. 225 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1933

In Excise Bd. v. … Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389 , 16 S. Ct. 344 , 40 L. Ed. 467 ; Wilson v. North Carolina, 169 U. S. 586 , 18 S. Ct. 435 , 42 L. Ed. 865 .”

Wall v. Snider

93 Okla. 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1923

State ex rel. v. Adams, 84 Mo. 310 -314: Bank of Willmar v. Lawler, 78 Minn. 135 , 80 N. W. 868 ; Barnes v. Bruce, 63 Okla. 270 , 165 Pac. 405 . … Brown et al. v. Massey, 13 Okla. 671 , 76 Pac. 226 ; Albright v. Warkentin, 31 Kan. 442 , 2 Pac. 614 .