Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

2,305 results

0.34s

  • Musick v. State Ex Rel. Miles

    185 Okla. 140 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 29, 1938

    This contention is based upon section 57, article o, of the Oklahoma State Constitution, which provides-in part that “every act of the Legislature * * * shall be clearly expressed in its title. i: * *» The title of House … The Legislature is by mandate charged with the duty of establishing a public school system. Article 13, section 1, Oklahoma State Constitution.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Craft v. Bates

    372 P.2d 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 29, 1962

    The evidence, viewed as a whole, is clearly insufficient to support any allegation of fraud. … A demurrer to the sufficiency of the evidence is properly sustained where the record does not contain any evidence tending to establish liability of the demurrant. Randall v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Burkhardt v. City of Enid

    771 P.2d 608 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1989

    Clearly the term was adequately defined to communicate the purpose of the tax. It was equally clear that tax proceeds would be used to purchase Phillips’ assets. … If no new university is established, the funds return to EEDA for debt reduction or economic development.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Sisk v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.

    81 P.3d 55 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 2003

    The former situation, in Hooper, supra note 6 , addressed whether a harm-dealing servant's law-conferred (parental) immunity operates to discharge the master's respondeat-superior liability to a third party. … In Hooper we answered in the negative by holding that servant's law-conferred immunity does not constitute an ex Zege release of the master.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Balduff Et Ux. v. Griswold

    9 Okla. 438 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1900

    He then had such an interest in the real estate as clearly entitled him to redeem from the deed executed to Bal-duff as security for his loan. … The effect is the same, and clearly entitles him to redeem. In Carr v. Carr, 52 N.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Fawcett Publications, Inc. v. Morris

    377 P.2d 42 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1962

    Qualified privilege, however, has broader scope. Definitions of qualified privilege are usually very general in nature and difficult of precise construction. See 53 C.J.S. Libel and Slander § 89 et seq.; 33 Am.Jur. … With regard to qualified, or conditional privilege, it is said in 53 C.J.S.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • BAGGS v. BAGGS

    2016 OK 117 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 2016

    preceding the commencement of the proceedings from which the qualified domestic order issues. 5. … A qualified domestic order shall clearly specify: a. the name and last-known mailing address (if any) of the member and the name and mailing address of the alternate payee covered by the order, b. the amount or percentage

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • White v. Board of County Com'rs of Tulsa County

    267 P.2d 579 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1954

    “We, the undersigned, being the' individual duly elected, qualified and acting members of the Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, do for ourselves, individually, affirm as follows: “1. … A state road as projected or established may be designated or established as a limited access facility, 69 O.S.1951 § 11.1 et seq.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Riley v. Carter

    165 Okla. 262 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1933

    Carter is the duly elected, qualified, and acting State Auditor, and that the respondent Ray O. … Weems is the duly elected, qualified, and acting State Treasurer; that for the month of July, 1933, he presented to the respondent E. C.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Shorter v. Tulsa Used Equipment & Industrial Engine Services

    148 P.3d 864 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 2006

    This analysis was clearly in error. … Today’s cause clearly deals with two separate entities. . Dominic, supra note 21 . . For the text of § 65.2 see supra note 1. .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Roberts v. Stith

    383 P.2d 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1963

    If the claim were established, defendants’ compensation was to' be one-third of that portion of the estate which would be distributed to plaintiff as Pearl McKinley’s common-law husband. … and write; that he was a member of the Armed Forces of this country during the last world war; that he reached the rank of sergeant; that he owned land in Osage County; that he was as intelligent as the average person (a qualified

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Reherman v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board

    679 P.2d 1296 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1984

    To achieve these purposes, the Legislature authorized the Board to issue by public sale its investment certificates and to use proceeds from these to make loans to eligible public entities 1 for qualified water projects. … expressed or necessarily implied purpose, is as clearly void as if in express terms forbidden....

    Cited 81 timesPublished
  • Robert K. Bell Enterprises, Inc. v. Tulsa County Fairgrounds Trust Authority

    695 P.2d 513 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1985

    The cases cited by appellant in support of its proposition clearly demonstrate the requirement that a deprivation of federal rights under color of local law is necessary to state a cause of action under section 1983. 11 These … any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Personal Loan & Finance Co. of Capitol Hill v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

    437 P.2d 1015 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1968

    The taxpayer contends that its debt is clearly in the category of note indebtedness of three years or less and is deductible for the purpose of determining taxable capital. … power, privilege or right inuring to” it,, within this State and requires payment of the tax for the right to exist as a corporation and enjoy under the protection of the State the powers, rights, privileges: and1 *1019 Immunities

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Barsh v. Mullins

    338 P.2d 845 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1959

    Hall had vision in only one eye and, therefore, under the Interstate Commerce Safety regulations was not qualified to drive in interstate commerce. … The case is clearly distinguishable from those cases in which'a covenant not to sue one joint toi’t-feasor does not protect another joint toi't-feasor from an action for damages brought against it by an injured party.”

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Flowers v. Flowers

    117 Okla. 209 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1925

    under the homestead laws of the United States, who, on March 16, 1896, was a bona fide occupant of laud within the territory established as Greer county, Okla., shall be entitled to .continue his occupation of such land … We think the finding of the court, that this real estate was the separate property of the deceased at the time of his marriage, is clearly erroneous. In the case of the United States v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • MAXWELL v. SPRINT PCS

    2016 OK 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 2016

    None of the records in these cases clearly provide the difference in rating had a different edition of the Guides been used. … The Claimant qualified for the maximum rate of temporary total disability compensation, but Goodyear paid the claimant her regular wages, which were at a higher rate than that required by statute.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Adoption of Baby Boy Kb

    264 P.3d 1258 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 2011

    At the conclusion of those proceedings the judge held that T.R. clearly exercised his paternal rights and that he made monetary contributions to the natural mother during her pregnancy. … STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶ 7 "An abuse of discretion occurs when a trial court exercises its discretion `to an end or purpose not justified by, and clearly against, reason and evidence.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hoffman v. County Commissioners

    3 Okla. 325 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 7, 1895

    duly qualified as provided by law, and then, and not until then, is issue taken. … After the assessment is made this municipality comes clearly within the statute.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • TAY v. GREEN

    509 P.3d 615 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 2022

    Moreover, Section 3 establishes when and to whom dispensaries may begin recreational-marijuana sales and requires the marijuana regulatory agency to adopt regulations authorizing residential delivery. ¶5 Section 4 establishes … With respect to any qualifying "person who has completed his or her sentence for a conviction . . .

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.