Case law

Hyde v. State Board of Equalization

196 Okla. 28 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1945

Tharel v. Board of County Commissioners of Creek County, 188 Okla. 184 , 107 P. 2d 542 . … of Equalization, within ten days after the adjournment of said Board.”

Jamieson v. State Board of Medical Examiners

35 Okla. 685 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 1913

And in Higgins v. Talty, 157 Mo. 280 , 57 S. … Caldwell v. Vaughn et al., 33 Okla. 384 , 125 Pac. 899 , members constituting the county election board of Cus *689 ter county.

Vandervoort v. Board of Comrs. Pawnee Co.

8 Okla. 227 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

The rule laid down in the case of Hoffman v. Board (preceding case) followed. For the reason herein stated, the petition in error must therefore be dismissed. All of the Justices concurring.

Josey Oil Co. v. Board of Commissioners

107 Okla. 266 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 1924

Thompson v. Hashbarger, 87 Okla., 267 , 210 Pac. 922 , and eases cited. … It will be noted that these provisions apply to boards of equalization only, and not to boards of county commissioners.

Woods v. State Board of Equalization

517 P.2d 430 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1973

Petitioner challenges the Board’s pre-legislative estimate on the theory that the Board’s inclusion of the State’s estimated share of the Federal funds contravenes Article X, § 23 of the Constitution of Oklahoma. … We do note, however, that the Board’s minutes of November 28, 1972, show that the Board estimated that the State would receive Federal Revenue Sharing Funds in the amount of $22,531,342.00, during the fiscal year ending June

National Surety Co. v. State Banking Board

49 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1915

Ed. 316 , and State Banking Board v. Farish, 235 U. S. 498 , 35 Sup. Ct. 185, 59 L. … In the cases of Lankford v. Schroeder and Farish v. Banking Board, supra, the power of the Banking Board to waive the immunity clause of the federal Constitution was also involved.

Ford v. Board of Tax-Roll Corrections

431 P.2d 423 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1967

In State Bar of Oklahoma v. … The court then quoted extensively from Lathrop v.

Board of County Commissioners v. Clarke & Courts

12 Okla. 197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 2, 1902

In Comanche County v. … In Robertson v.

Board of Com'rs v. Tulsa Business College

150 Okla. 197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 7, 1931

The board of county commissioners of Tulsa county held the property taxable on the ground that the school was operated for profit. … O. .1., CLARK, V. C. ,X., and RILEY, CULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ„ concur.

Tonini & Bramblet v. Board of Com'rs

149 Okla. 183 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1931

(Tonini et al. v. Board of County Com’rs, 100 Okla. 246 , 229 Pac. 263 .) … Board of County Commissioners of Yellowstone County v. Northern Pacific Railway Company (Mont.) 25 Pac. 1058 . Citing In re Sinking Fund Cases, 99 U. S. 700 ; Smith v. Strother (Cal.) 8 Pac. 852 .

Jones v. Board of Ed. of Muskogee

90 Okla. 233 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 10, 1923

Board of Education of the City of Perry v. Haralson, County Treasurer, 2 Okla. 170 , 37 Pac. 1063 ; Board of Education of City of Guthrie, Logan County, v. Excise Board of Logan County, 86 Okla. 24 , 206 Pac. 617 . … In the case of Board of Education of City of Guthrie, Logan County, v.

Federal Tax Co. v. Board of Com'rs

187 Okla. 223 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1940

In Abernathy et al. v. … Baldridge v. Smith (1919) 76 Okla. 36 , 184 P. 153 ; Tracy v. Tracy (1919) 76 Okla. 161 , 184 P. 81 ; Jones v. Snyder (1926) 121 Okla. 254 , 249 P. 313 .

Polk v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

420 P.2d 520 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1966

Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. … This question was considered in Riley v. Cordell et al., 200 Okl. 390 , 194 P.2d 857 , and in Findley v. State Election Board, Okl., 325 P.2d 1037 .

Lewis v. Tulsa County Excise Board

200 Okla. 606 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1948

Co. v. Bailey, Co. Treas., 125 Okla. 183 , 257 P. 784 . … In McMahan v.

Board of Com'rs v. State Highway Commission

163 Okla. 207 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1933

Wentz v. Ingenthron, 146 Okla. 165 . 294 P. 154 ; Wentz v. Board of County Commissioners of Lincoln County, 147 Okla. 173 , 295 P. 599 ; Wentz v. Dawson, 149 Okla. 94 , 299 P. 493 ; Hawks v. … The plaintiff, board of county commissioners, must have known it.

Oklahoma Planning & Resources Board v. Morgan

347 P.2d 1029 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1959

William Reedy Morgan, hereinafter called claimant, filed his first notice of injury and claim for compensation stating that on October 31, 1957, while employed by the Oklahoma Planning and Resources Board he sustained an … Morgan Drilling Co. v. Bower, 199 Okl. 667 , 189 P.2d 943 ; Wise-Buchanan Coal Co. v. Risco, 150 Okl. 190 , 1 P.2d 411 ; Ellis & Lewis v. Lane, 152 Okl. 273 , 4 P.2d 104 .

Barnsdall Refineries, Inc. v. State Board

171 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1935

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization, cause No. 24271, decided Feb. 12, 1935, 170 Okla. 516 , 41 P. (2d) 453 , having disposed of this matter, the appeal is dismissed.

Pearl v. State Board of Education

95 Okla. 204 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1923

A motion to dismiss appeal has been filed herein by the defendants in error, alleging that tho appeal is from tin1 action of tho State Board of Education and that no appeal is provided by statute in such cases.

McMahan v. Board of Ed., Oklahoma City

142 Okla. 110 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1930

Section 26, Id., is a limitation (Eaton v. St. L. & S. F. Ry. … It is his contention that,, because this court, in Coggeshall & Co. v. Smiley, supra, Aaronson v.

Board of County Com'rs v. Kinkeade

198 Okla. 662 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1946

J., HURST, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, WELCH, and DAVI-SON, JJ., concur.