Case law

In re Amending & Revising Oklahoma Uniform Jury Instructions-Civil-No. 1.7, 3.26, 6.16, 21.4, 21.7, 23.10, & 23.31

217 P.3d 620 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 2009

Comments The Oklahoma Supreme Court held in Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 1992 OK 72 , ¶ 10, 833 P.2d 1218, 1225 , that the public policy exception was applicable to a racially motivated discharge. … Coody v.

In Re Spilman

240 P.3d 702 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 2010

Cnty. v. State ex rel. … 19] Allen v.

Kutch v. Cosner

202 Okla. 470 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1950

In Pine v. … Quick v. City of Fairview, 144 Okla. 231 , 291 P. 95 . They were in so acting a board exercising judicial functions, and inferior in jurisdiction to the district court.

Ohio Oil Co. v. Payne

187 Okla. 464 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1940

The order of the board of equalization is a quasi-judicial order, which, if not appealed from, becomes a final order and cannot be collaterally attacked. Hopper et al. v. Okla. County, 43 Okla. 288 , 143 P. 4 ; State v. … S., Counties, sec. 91 b; Board of County Com’rs of Marion County v. Powell (Ind.) 10 N. E. 2d 728 .

Barteldes Seed Co. v. Gunn

61 Okla. 95 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1916

Hence it was in Brown v. Hebard, 20 Wis. 326 [ 91 Am. … Also, the same author, in Brown v. Hebard, supra, said: “Section 94 of chapter 134, R.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Busch

976 P.2d 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1999

See Shelton v. Lambert, 1965 OK 28, ¶ 11 , 399 P.2d 467, 470 ; Globe-Union, Inc. v. Chicago Telephone Supply Co., 103 F.2d 722, 728 (7th Cir.1939). 35 . See Brown v. … Brown, 1989 OK 75 , 773 P.2d 751 ). 90 . State ex rel. Okl. Bar Ass’n v. Patmon, 1997 OK 62, ¶ 5 , 939 P.2d 1155, 1157 . 91 . For the terms of ORPC Rule 8.4(c), see supra note 61. 92 .

Reed v. Rockliff-Gibson Const. Co.

25 Okla. 633 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1910

Indeed, such was,the holding of this court in construing a statute of like import in Hannan v. Board of Education of the City of Lawton, ante, p. 372, 107 Pac. 646 . … Rep. 587 ; State ex rel. v. Board of Commissioners of Shawnee County, 57 Kan. 267 , 45 Pac. 616 ; Kilvington v. Superior, 83. Wis. 222, 53 N. W. 487 , 18 L. R. A. 45; Bye v. Atlantic City et al., 73 N. J.

Meyer v. Corn

191 Okla. 537 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1942

In Swearingen v. … In the case of Cherryhomes v. Board of County Commissioners, Tulsa County, 160 Okla. 159 , 16 P. 2d 257 , we considered an identical contention with respect to the same sale.

Central Surety & Ins. Corp. v. State Industrial Commission

180 Okla. 383 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1937

See, also, Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v. Mathews, 162 Okla. 283 , 20 P. (2d) 141 ; Spivey & McGill v. Nixon, 163 Okla. 278 , 21 P. (2d) 1049 ; Missouri, K. & O. Coach Lines v. … Smith Aircraft Co. v. State *385 Industrial Commission, 151 Okla. 67 , 1 P. (2d) 682 ; Lee Way Stage Lines v. Simmons, 166 Okla. 203 , 26 P. (2d) 905 ; Harbour-Longmire-Pace Co. v.

Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. French

368 P.2d 652 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 28, 1961

Co. v. Nickels, Okl., 343 P.2d 1094 ; Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Ry. Co. v. Painter, Okl., 333 P.2d 547 ; Thompson v. … Rush v. Brown, 187 Okl. 97 , 101 P.2d 262 . The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. WILLIAMS, C. J., and DAVISON, IRWIN and BERRY, JJ., concur. BLACKBIRD, V. C. J., and HALLEY and JOHNSON, JJ., dissent.

McBirney v. Bader

181 Okla. 237 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 19, 1937

Page v. Hinchee, 174 Okla. 537 , 51 P. (2d) 487 ; Scott v. Norris, 62 Okla. 292 , 162 P. 1085 ; Winans v. Hare, 46 Okla. 741 , 148 P. 1052 ; Parlette v. Equitable Farm Mtg. … Assuming that this is correct, yet, as stated in Brown v. Brown, 142 Iowa, 125 , 120 N.

T.I.M. Co. v. Oklahoma Land Title Ass'n

698 P.2d 915 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1985

Freeman v. Abstractors Board of Examiners, 99 Mont. 564 , 45 P.2d 668 (1935). … Freeman v. Abstractors Board of Examiners, supra.

Immanuel Baptist Church v. Glass

497 P.2d 757 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 23, 1972

Eveland v. … In House of Rest, Etc. v.

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Miles

69 Okla. 138 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1918

Co., v. Clark, 42 Okla. 638 , 142 Pac. 396 ; St. L. & S. F. R. Co. v. Model Laundry, 42 Okla. 501 , 141 Pac. 970 : M., K. & T. R. Co. v. Robnett, 57 Okla. 470 , 157 Pac. 72 ; C., R. I. & P. R. Co. v. … Dugan v. Arthurs, 230 Pa. 299 , 70 Atl. 626 , 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 778, and note: Wolfe v. Ives, 83 Conn. 174 , 76 Atl. 526 , 19 Ann. Cas. 752, and note; Kelly v. Weaver, 77 Or. 267 , 150 Pac. 166 , 151 Pac. 463 , Ann.

Anderson v. Barr

178 Okla. 508 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1936

Wiswell v. Giroux (Colo.) 197 P. 759 ; Sawyer v. Bahnsen, 102 Okla. 41 , 226 P. 344 ; Hays v. Smith, 65 Okla. 113 , 164 P. 470 ; Lee v. … Co. v. Rider, 171 Okla. 262 , 42 P. (2d) 842 ; Unger v. Shull, 154 Okla. 277 , 7 P. (2d) 881 ; First Nat. Bank v. Hendrick, 135 Okla. 260 , 275 P. 314 .

Oklahoma Union Bus Terminal v. Stone

162 Okla. 26 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1933

Co. et al. v. … Also in the case of Mobley v.

Crown Drug Company v. McBride

303 P.2d 970 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 19, 1956

Corporation, Ltd. v. Thompson, 101 Okl. 138 , 223 P. 666 . Rich v. … In the case of Danner v.

Moreland v. State Ex Rel. Hatfield

175 Okla. 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1935

Lamb v. Alexander, 83 Okla. 292 , 201 P. 519 . … J., OSBORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, BUSBY, and PHELPS, JJ., concur.

Ashcraft v. Butts

185 Okla. 587 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1939

Howell v. Lena R. … AVe therefore conclude that the rule announced in Howell v. Board, as quoted, supra, governs this case, but that its application herein is justified upon consideration of the-doctrine of estoppel.

Martin v. Follis

133 Okla. 162 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1928

Co. v. Wallace et al., 38 Okla. 233 , 132 Pac. 908 . … In the case of Ferguson v.