Case law

In Re Spilman

240 P.3d 702 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 2010

Cnty. v. State ex rel. … 19] Allen v.

Kutch v. Cosner

202 Okla. 470 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1950

In Pine v. … Quick v. City of Fairview, 144 Okla. 231 , 291 P. 95 . They were in so acting a board exercising judicial functions, and inferior in jurisdiction to the district court.

Farm Land Mortgage Co. v. Wilde

41 Okla. 45 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1913

Crabtree v. Levings, 53 Ill. 526 ; Rudd v. Savelli, 44 Ark. 145 ; McMurry v. Fletcher, 24 Kan. 574 ; Ruffner v. McConnell, 17 Ill. 212, 63 Am. Dec. 364 . … (Simmons v. Zimmerman, 144 Cal. 264 , 79 Pac. 452 , 1 Ann. Cas. 850.) Also Brown v. Poster, 18 Am. Rep. 463 ; Gibson v. Cranage, 39 Mich. 49 , 33 Am. Rep. 351 ; Zaleski v. Clark, 44 Conn. 218 , 26 Am.

Mercury Insurance v. Miles

190 Okla. 607 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1942

Two of them (Brown v. Conn. Fire Ins. Co., 52 Okla. 392 , 153 P. 173 , and St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. … Co. v.

Ohio Oil Co. v. Payne

187 Okla. 464 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1940

The order of the board of equalization is a quasi-judicial order, which, if not appealed from, becomes a final order and cannot be collaterally attacked. Hopper et al. v. Okla. County, 43 Okla. 288 , 143 P. 4 ; State v. … S., Counties, sec. 91 b; Board of County Com’rs of Marion County v. Powell (Ind.) 10 N. E. 2d 728 .

Reed v. Rockliff-Gibson Const. Co.

25 Okla. 633 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1910

Indeed, such was,the holding of this court in construing a statute of like import in Hannan v. Board of Education of the City of Lawton, ante, p. 372, 107 Pac. 646 . … Rep. 587 ; State ex rel. v. Board of Commissioners of Shawnee County, 57 Kan. 267 , 45 Pac. 616 ; Kilvington v. Superior, 83. Wis. 222, 53 N. W. 487 , 18 L. R. A. 45; Bye v. Atlantic City et al., 73 N. J.

Mills v. Lester

169 Okla. 344 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1934

Harrelson et al. v. Brown et al., 131 Okla. 267 , 268 P. 731 . “Assignments of error which are not briefed by appellant and supported by argument or citation of authorities are waived.” Nolan v. … City National Bank v. Coatney, 122 Okla. 233 , 253 P. 481 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Weaver, 67 Okla. 292 , 171 P. 34 ; Lawton National Bank v. Ulrich, 81 Okla. 159 , 197 P. 167 .” Hamm v.

Meyer v. Corn

191 Okla. 537 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1942

In Swearingen v. … In the case of Cherryhomes v. Board of County Commissioners, Tulsa County, 160 Okla. 159 , 16 P. 2d 257 , we considered an identical contention with respect to the same sale.

Vahlberg v. Porter

177 Okla. 380 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1936

S. 1931, affords the only remedy whereby a taxpayer may recover illegal taxes paid (Grubb v. … Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board, 168 Okla. 485 , 34 P. (2d) 585 . It follows that the money representing the overcharge in the instant case still remains the money of the plaintiff.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Wells

56 Okla. 599 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1916

Co. v. Freeland, 39 Okla. 60 , 134 Pac. 47 .) . … (Rhyne v. Turley, 37 Okla. 159 , 131 Pac. 695 .)

McBirney v. Bader

181 Okla. 237 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 19, 1937

Page v. Hinchee, 174 Okla. 537 , 51 P. (2d) 487 ; Scott v. Norris, 62 Okla. 292 , 162 P. 1085 ; Winans v. Hare, 46 Okla. 741 , 148 P. 1052 ; Parlette v. Equitable Farm Mtg. … Assuming that this is correct, yet, as stated in Brown v. Brown, 142 Iowa, 125 , 120 N.

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Miles

69 Okla. 138 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1918

Co., v. Clark, 42 Okla. 638 , 142 Pac. 396 ; St. L. & S. F. R. Co. v. Model Laundry, 42 Okla. 501 , 141 Pac. 970 : M., K. & T. R. Co. v. Robnett, 57 Okla. 470 , 157 Pac. 72 ; C., R. I. & P. R. Co. v. … Dugan v. Arthurs, 230 Pa. 299 , 70 Atl. 626 , 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 778, and note: Wolfe v. Ives, 83 Conn. 174 , 76 Atl. 526 , 19 Ann. Cas. 752, and note; Kelly v. Weaver, 77 Or. 267 , 150 Pac. 166 , 151 Pac. 463 , Ann.

T.I.M. Co. v. Oklahoma Land Title Ass'n

698 P.2d 915 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1985

Freeman v. Abstractors Board of Examiners, 99 Mont. 564 , 45 P.2d 668 (1935). … Freeman v. Abstractors Board of Examiners, supra.

Immanuel Baptist Church v. Glass

497 P.2d 757 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 23, 1972

Eveland v. … In House of Rest, Etc. v.

Lewis v. Montgomery Ward and Company

368 P.2d 995 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1962

Claimant cites Denbo v. … Mobley v. Brown et al., 151 Okl. 167 , 2 P.2d 1034 , 83 A.L.R. 1014 .”

Oklahoma Union Bus Terminal v. Stone

162 Okla. 26 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1933

Co. et al. v. … Also in the case of Mobley v.

In re Amending & Revising Oklahoma Uniform Jury Instructions-Civil-No. 1.7, 3.26, 6.16, 21.4, 21.7, 23.10, & 23.31

217 P.3d 620 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 2009

Comments The Oklahoma Supreme Court held in Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 1992 OK 72 , ¶ 10, 833 P.2d 1218, 1225 , that the public policy exception was applicable to a racially motivated discharge. … Coody v.

Moreland v. State Ex Rel. Hatfield

175 Okla. 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1935

Lamb v. Alexander, 83 Okla. 292 , 201 P. 519 . … J., OSBORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, BUSBY, and PHELPS, JJ., concur.

Ashcraft v. Butts

185 Okla. 587 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1939

Howell v. Lena R. … AVe therefore conclude that the rule announced in Howell v. Board, as quoted, supra, governs this case, but that its application herein is justified upon consideration of the-doctrine of estoppel.

Martin v. Follis

133 Okla. 162 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1928

Co. v. Wallace et al., 38 Okla. 233 , 132 Pac. 908 . … In the case of Ferguson v.