Case law

Cahill v. Pine Creek Oil Co.

38 Okla. 568 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 1913

In the case of McDonald v. … To like effect are the cases of Brown v. Hartshorn, 12 Okla. 121 , 69 Pac. 1049 ; Olds v. Conger, 1 Okla. 232 , 32 Pac. 337 ; Conaway v. Gore, 27 Kan. 127 ; Burdette v. Corgam, 27 Kan. 275 .

Thomas v. Dawson

189 Okla. 193 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 1941

Shore v. Board of Education of Town of Crescent et al., 97 Okla. 273 , 223 P. 867 ; Cheek v. Eye, 96 Okla. 44 , 219 P. 883 ; Chambers v. Walker, 85 Okla. 289 , 206 P. 202 ; Fowler v. Park, 79 Okla. 1 , 190 P. 668 . … State v. Holtzclaw, 151 Okla. 163 , 2 P. 2d 1022 . Judgment affirmed. WELCH, C. J„ and RILEY, GIBSON, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

Oberlander v. Eddington

391 P.2d 889 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1964

Co. v. … Descent and Distribution § 18; Brown v. Brown, 53 N.M. 379 , 208 P.2d 1081 .

Redeagle v. Channing

146 Okla. 288 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1930

This court, in the case of Caesar v. … In Spicer v. Coon, 110 Okla. 233 , 238 Pac. 833 , a similar question was presented.

Morgan Sash & Door Co. v. Cullen Lbr. Co.

195 Okla. 448 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1945

In Hall (Brown, Administrator) v. … In Brown, Price Administrator, v. Click Bros.

Henry v. Schmidt

75 O.B.A.J. 1479 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 2004

Watson v. State ex rel. Michael, 1989 OK 116, ¶ 5 , 777 P.2d 945, 946-47 . 4 . Id.; Olda. Const. art. 2, § 25, Okla. Stat. tit. 21, §§ 565-67 (2001). 6 . Board of Governors of Registered Dentists of Oklahoma v. … Presley v. Board or County Comm’rs, 1999 OK 45, ¶ 8 , 981 P.2d 309, 312 .

Moore v. Milner

187 Okla. 84 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1940

WELCH, V. C. J. … See Lamar v. Albert G. Browne, 23 L. Ed. 650 , 92 U. S. 187 , 187 S. Ct. 202 .

Byers v. Dunham, County Treasurer

50 Okla. 266 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 20, 1915

the bond election held to authorize the bridge bonds in question in this action, it will, we think, only be necessary to digest section- 8172 of the Revised Laws of Oklahoma 1910, which reads, in part, as follows: “The board … Columbia Bank & Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 33 Okla. 535 , 126 Pac. 556 . Finding no error in the judgment of the district court of Mayes county, we recommend that the same be affirmed.

Morrison State Bank v. Michael

54 Okla. 257 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1915

The only question for consideration is, whether the president and cashier of a -bank, organized under the laws of this state, can, without the approval of the board of directors, agree to pay, or guarantee to a depositor, … Hooper v. State, 7 Okla. Cr. 73 , 121 Pac. 1087 .”

Smith v. First Nat. Bank of Chandler

114 Okla. 293 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1926

Hoffman v. Eastern Wis. Ry. & L’ght Co. (Wis.) 115 N. W. 383 : Board of Commissioners of Kingfisher County v. Grimes, 75 Okla. 219 182 Pac. 897 ; Wolf v. … Blackwell O'l & Gas Co., 77 Okla. 81 . 186 Pac. 484 ; Hickman et al. v. Cabot, 183 Fed. 747 ; Board of Commerce of Ann Arbor. Mich., v. Security Trust Co, 225 Fed. 454 ; Hawkins v. G. W. Ry.

Cities Service Oil Co. v. Jamison

189 Okla. 445 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1941

The scaffold apparently had upright posts at each corner, and its floor consisted of 2 x 8 or 2 x 12 boards, nailed or fastened until “these boards couldn’t slip.” … See, also, Mid-Continent Petroleum Co. v. Allen, 110 Okla. 101 , 236 P. 426 , and Breene v. Crawford, 175 Okla. 186 , 53 P. 2d 244 .

Dill v. Malot

66 Okla. 74 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 28, 1917

In said case of Doughty- v. … Co. v. Brown, 55 Okla. 173 , 154 Pac. 1161 ; Thompson v. Vaught, 61 Okla. 195 , 160 Pac. 625 ; Gilkeson v. Callahan, 62 Okla. 45 , 161 Pac. 789 . This cause is affirmed. By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cowan v. Hubbard

50 Okla. 671 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 31, 1915

To the same effect see United States v. Morse, 218 U. S. 493 , 31 Sup. Ct. 37, 54 L. Ed. 1123 , 21 Am. Cas. 782; Equitable, etc., Co. v. Board of Com., etc., 86 Kan. 708 , 121 Pac. 1097 ; Board of Com. v. … In Beachy v.

Hull v. Sun Refining and Marketing Co.

789 P.2d 1272 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1990

Reaves v. Reaves, 15 Okl. 240 , 82 P. 490, 495 (1905). . Tenneco Oil Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co., 687 P.2d 1049, 1054 (Okla.1984); McCasland v. Board of Comm'rs, 126 Okl. 103 , 258 P. 750, 752 (1927). . Smith v. … Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Williams, 158 F.2d 723, 727 (5th Cir.1946); Cabot Corp. v. Brown, 754 S.W.2d 104, 107 (Tex.1987); 4 Williams & Meyers, "Oil & Gas Law,” 571, 604, Ch. 7, § 705 (1988); R.

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

166 Okla. 147 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 31, 1933

In Albrecht v. Jones, Co. Treas., 130 Okla. 277 , 267 P. 270 , it was held that in determining the amount of surplus balance of revenue or levy, under the provisions of section 9699, C. O. … Under the provisions thereof, in determining the rates of levy for ad valorem taxation, the procedure is as follows; First, the excise board shall ascertain the total valuation of .the property taxed ad valorem in the taxing

Johnson v. Walters

62 O.B.A.J. 3397 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1991

Wiseman v. Oklahoma Board of Corrections, 614 P.2d 551 (Okla.1978). Wiseman held that section 11 applies to general legislation bills and bills containing only one item of appropriation. Id. at 555 . … Bond v. Phelps, 200 Okla. 70, 82 , 191 P.2d 938, 950 (1948).

Home State Life Ins. Co. v. Jennings

179 Okla. 39 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1937

W. v. Brown, 94 Okla. 277 , 221 P. 1017 . … W. v.

State Ex Rel. Western State Hospital v. Stoner

614 P.2d 59 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1980

Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Moss, 509 P.2d 666, 668 (Okl.1973), as the equivalent of “must”, and we have in turn defined “shall” in State v. … Board of Education of Independent School District # 48 of Hughes County v. Rives, 531 P.2d 335 (Okl.1974).

Oklahoma County Utility Services Authority v. Corporation Commission

519 P.2d 919 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 22, 1974

Dobbs v. Board of County Commissioners, 208 Okl. 514 , 257 P.2d 802 . … Haas v. Holloman, Okl., 327 P.2d 655 . In Lowden v.

Teleco, Inc. v. CORP. COM'N OF STATE OF OKL.

649 P.2d 772 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 27, 1982

Comm., Okl., 614 P.2d 45, 50 [1980]; D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners, 11 Cal.3d 1 , 520 P.2d 10, 20 [1974], 8 . Hill v. Texas Water Quality Board, 568 S.W.2d 738, 741 [Tex.1978]. 9 . City of York v. Pa. … Stevens v. First Nat’l. Bank of Nev., supra note 14 at 155. 17 . McTaggart v. Public Serv. Comm., 168 Mont. 155 , 541 P.2d 778, 780 [1975], 18 . Supra note 7, 614 P.2d at 53 . 19 . McTaggart v. Public Serv.