Case law

Turner v. Rector

544 P.2d 507 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 23, 1975

The walkway had boards which were “loose, some were off entirely, so that there were holes in said walk, and many of the boards were warped and uneven.” … Beatty v. Dixon, Okl., 408 P.2d 339 ; Herndon v. Paschal, Okl., 410 P.2d 549 ; Sullins v. Mills, supra; Pruitt v. Timme, Okl., 349 P.2d 4 .

Spaulding v. Beidleman

49 Okla. 197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1915

Treas., v. … In re Brown, 2 Okla. 590 , 39 Pac. 469 ; Swan v. United States, 2 Okla. 114 , 37 Pac. 1061 ; Vowell v. Taylor, 8 Okla. 625 , 58 Pac. 944 ; Moberly v. Roth et al., 23 Okla. 856 , 102 Pac. 182 ; Rolater v.

Flynt v. Hastings

122 Okla. 60 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1926

Ct. 532, 59 Ed. 844; Gladney v. Richardson, 44 Okla. 94, 143 Pac. 683 : Hudson v. Hildt. 51 Okla. 59 , 151 Pac. 1063 : Brown v. Van Pelt, 64 Okla. 109 , 166 Pac. 102 ; Carden v. … Humble, 6 Okla. 165 . 184 Pac. 104 ; Taylor v. Callaan, 82 Okla. 67 , 198 Pac. 487 ; Walker v. Holmes, 91 Okla. 64 , 215 Pac. 1065 ; Chism v. Majors, 92 Okla. 45 , 217 Pac. 465 ; Hull v.

Thomas v. Farrier

179 Okla. 263 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1937

The recent ease of Siegenthaler v. … “In Kingfisher Improvement Co. v.

Maxwell v. City of Tulsa

145 Okla. 155 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1930

Goldsmith v. City of Lawton, 136 Okla. 201 , 277 Pac. 230 ; Youngblood v. Town of Wewoka, 95 Okla. 28 , 225 Pac. 695 ; Teter v. Board of Ed., City of Drumright, 85 Okla. 16 , 204 Pac. 129 .

Town of Reydon v. Anderson

649 P.2d 541 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 27, 1982

In Langston City v. … Blake, 19 N.W.2d 220, 223 (1945); Board of Com’rs. of Oklahoma County v. Young, 186 Okl. 182 , 97 P.2d 6, 10 (1939); State v. City of Manhatten, 115 Kan. 794 , 225 P. 85 (1924). 6 .

Standard Paving Co. v. City of Wewoka

170 Okla. 272 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1934

of commissioners and shall be based upon specifications provided by said board. … There being ample evidence to sustain such conclusions, and under the authority of the case of the United States Rubber Co. v.

Investors Royalty Co. v. Lewis

185 Okla. 302 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1939

In support of that contention plaintiff relies on Brazell v. Brown (1934) 169 Okla. 623 , 38 P.2d 17 . … WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, J., absent.

Thornton v. Woodson

570 P.2d 340 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1977

*341 BERRY, Justice: A customer, Opal V. … Wade v. Brown, Okl., 516 P.2d 526, at 528 . 18 O.S.1971 § 1.204a applies where defendant is a non-resident non-domesticated corporation with no service agent in Oklahoma.

Smith v. Torr

310 P.2d 378 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1957

. * * * ” This court in the cases of Wiebener v. Peoples, 44 Okl. 32 , 142 P. 1036 , and Stewart v. … Bowles v. Brown, 187 Okl. 264 , 102 P.2d 837 ; Winemiller v. Lorton, 121 Okl. 99 , 249 P. 406 .

Great Plains Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Dabney

846 P.2d 1088 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1993

Howell, supra at 447 . [4] See e.g., Seanor v. Browne, 154 Okl. 222 , 7 P.2d 627, 630 (1932); Funnell v. … When speaking for the court in Brown v.

Health Care Associates, Inc. v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

72 O.B.A.J. 1811 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 2001

Its Assessment Board determined that the nurses were employees of HCA. … Department of Labor, 745 So.2d 194 (La.Ct.App.1999) (temporary placement agency for nurses); Trauma Nurses, Inc. v. Board of Review, 242 N.J.Super. 135 , 576 A.2d 285 (1990) (nurse employment broker). .

Crocker v. Donovan

1 Okla. 165 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1892

(Panker v. Windson, 5 Kends, 374; Chase County v. Shipman, 14 Id., 532; Lumber Co. v. Jones, 32 Id., 195. … (Frear v. Herdenbegh, 5 Johns, 272; Danforth v. Culver, 11 id. 146; Clank v. Shultz, 4 Mo. 235 ; Zickafosse v. Hulick, 1 Morris, 175 ; Pierson v. David, 1 Iowa, 26 .)

Pitts v. Allen

138 Okla. 295 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 1928

Co0. v. Taylor, 87 Okla. 140 , 209 Pac. 749 . … See, also, Taylor v. Cole (Cal.) 257 Pac. 40 ; State ex rel. Kansas City v. Trimble (Mo.) 298 S. W. 883 -37; State ex rel. Strait v. Brooks (Mo.) 293. S. W. 471; City of Ft. Worth v. Davidson (Tex.) 298 S.

McInteer v. Gillespie

31 Okla. 644 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1912

In Brown, App., v. Coddington et al., 72 Hun, 147 , 25 N. Y. … En. of Law, 1158; 30 Cyc. 187; Martin et al. v. Martin, 170 Ill. 639 , 48 N. E. 924 , 62 Am. St. Rep. 411 ; Hunt v. Wright, 47 N. H. 396, 93 Am. Dec, 451; Ex parte Cubbage et al. v. Franklin, 62 Mo. 364 ; Coleman v.

Wilson v. Ferguson

84 Okla. 79 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1921

In Mass et al. v. … To the same effect are Loman v. Paullin, 51 Okla. 294 , 152 Pac. 73 , Duroderigo v. Culwell, 52 Okla. 6 , 152 Pac. 605 , and Adams Oil & Gas Co. v. Hudson et al., 55 Okla. 386 , 155 Pac. 220 .

Harris v. First Nat. Bank of Pryor Creek

140 Okla. 269 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 19, 1929

This court in Cherry v. … Brown, 79 Okla. 215 , 192 Pac. 227 , in the 4th paragraph of the syllabus said: “It is neither slight, ordinary, nor gross negligence on the part of the complaining party or his counsel to rely upon the court reporter furnishing

Oakes v. Trumbo

201 Okla. 102 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1948

Bellaire Securities Corp. et al. v. Brown et al., 124 Fla. 47 , 168 So. 625 . The New York court said: “A memorandum which did not contain buyer’s name was an insufficient compliance with the statute of frauds.” … Illinois Pearl Button Co., Inc., v. Acme Plastics Mfg. Co., Inc., 51 N. Y. S. 2d 5. In the case of Jennings et al. v.

Buellesfeld v. Carpenter

191 Okla. 301 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1942

He cites Posey v. … Colonial Jewelry Co. v. Brown, 38 Okla. 44 , 131 P. 1077 ; Tovera v. Parker, 35 Okla. 74 , 128 P. 101 , and other Oklahoma cases. They assert that this is the universal rule and cite Burk v. Dulaney, 153 U.

Freeman-Sipes Co. v. Corticelli Silk Co.

34 Okla. 229 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1912

In Ware et al. v. … Hamilton Brown Shoe Co., 92 Ala. 145 , 9 South. 136 , it was said: “The bill avers that Ware was merchandising in Alabama, that complainant's debt is due for shoes sold and shipped to- him from its factory in St.