Case law

Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. McLaughlin

70 Okla. 237 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 23, 1918

It is earnestly contended by counsel for defendant that the rule announced in the case of Brown v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co., 52 Okla. 392 , 153 Pac. 174 , is controlling in this case. … In the Brown v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.

State ex rel. Dabney v. Peck

139 Okla. 28 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1929

Gen., v. … Gen., v. Sheldon, 135 Okla. 278 , 276 Pac. 468 .

Duncan Life & Accident Ass'n v. Ross

174 Okla. 389 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1935

W. v. … City of Pawhuska v. Martin, 151 Okla. 24 , 1 P. (2d) 638 ; Ferguson v. Davis Co., 57 Iowa, 601 , 10 N. W. 906 ; Billings v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 70 Vt. 477 , 41 Atl. 516 .

Sipes v. Dickinson

39 Okla. 740 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1913

Anthony v. Eddy, 5 Kan. 127 ; Field v. Kinnear, 5 Kan. 233, 238 ; Owen v. Owen, 9 Kan. 91 ; Atyeo v. Kelsey, 13 Kan. 212 ; Brown v. Atchison, etc., Ry. Co., 29 Kan. 18 ; City of Sedan v. … O’Toole et al., 20 Okla. 319 , 94 Pac. 547 ; Prescott v. Brown, 30 Okla. 428 , 120 Pac. 991 ; Edwards v. Miller, 30 Okla. 442 , 120 Pac. 996 .

Boyanton v. Reif

798 P.2d 603 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1990

See Karriman v. Orthopedic Clinic, Okl., 516 P.2d 534 [1973] (defendant orthopedist). . See Champion v. Keith, 17 Okl. 204 , 87 P. 845, 846 [1906]; Karriman, supra note 3 at 540. . … Turney v. Anspaugh, 581 P.2d 1301, 1305 [1978]; Cassingham v. Berry, 67 Okl. 134 , 150 P. 139, 141 [1915], .

Colburn v. Snell

144 Okla. 114 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1930

Erwin, 87 Okla. 295 , 210 Pac. 1021 ; In re Cook’s Will, 88 Okla. 301 , 213 Pac. 78 ; Arkansas Fertilizer Co. v. Brattin, 127 Okla. 9 , 260 Pac. 43 ; Harrelson v. Brown, 131 Okla. 267 , 268 Pac. 731 ; Thomas v. … We have examined these cases, and find that in the cases of Brown v. Marks, Mitchell v. Bruce, Arkansas Fertilizer v. Brattin, Harrelson v. Brown, and Thomas v.

Moore v. Bevis

9 Okla. 672 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1900

(Gi llett and Libbey et al. v. Murphy, Carroll and Brough, 7 Okla. 91 .) In Meyer Brothers Drug Company v. Kelley et al. 5 Okla. 118 , it is said: “The rule of Light v. … In Tootle et al. v.

Sapulpa Electric Interurban Ry. Co. v. Broome

93 Okla. 115 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1923

Tulsa Entertainment Co. v. Greenlees, 85 Okla. 113 , 205 Pac. 179 . … In Boling v.

Beatrice Creamery Co. v. Goldman

175 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1935

Independent Gin Co., 140 Okla. 80 , 282 P. 635 ; Wagnon et al. v. Brown, 169 Okla. 292 , 36 P. (2d) 723 ; Brotherhood of Ry. Trainmen v. … Brown, 170 Okla. 67 , 38 P. (2d) 529 ); and generally, such insurance may not be the subject of evidence in such eases (Lakeview, Inc., v. Davidson, 166 Okla. 171 , 26 P. (2d) 760 ).

Dugger v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission

63 O.B.A.J. 2135 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1992

State v. Oklahoma State Board for Property and Casualty Rates, 731 P.2d 394, 404 (Okla.1986) and Suglove v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 605 P.2d 1315, 1318 (Okla.1980). . Baumgardner v. State ex rel. … Board of Trustees for the Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement Board, 782 P.2d 911 (Okla.1989); Oklahoma Park, Inc. v.

Johnson v. High

193 Okla. 105 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1943

J. 1353; Herod v. Carter, 81 Kan. 236 , 106 P. 32 ; Jefferson County v. Johnson, 23 Kan. 717 . Defendant also relies on Chamberlain V. … GIBSON, V. C. J., absent.

High v. United States

14 Okla. 399 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 3, 1904

See Board of Commissioners of Custer Co. v. Moon, 8 Okla. 205 , and cases cited. The petition in error, therefore is dismissed, with costs to plaintiff in error.

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Newell

25 Okla. 502 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1910

Co. v. … Co. v. State, supra.; M., K. & T. Ry. Co. v. State, 24 Okla. 331 , 103 Pac. 613 .

Morris v. Sanchez

746 P.2d 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1987

Brown, 98 App.Div.2d 339, 348-49, 470 N.Y.S.2d 634 (1983): “We have carefully considered the competing legal and ethical viewpoints expressed in this nettlesome area of the law, viewpoints which challenge the fundamental … Greenberg, 64 N.Y.2d 427 , 488 N.Y.S.2d 143 , 477 N.E.2d 445 (1985); Weintraub v. Brown, 98 A.D.2d 339 , 470 N.Y.S.2d 634 (1983); Mason v. Western Pennsylvania Hospital, 499 Pa. 484 , 453 A.2d 974 (1982); Terrell v.

Potter v. Pure Oil Co.

182 Okla. 509 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 1938

That a spring board or diving board was maintained and that all these were in convenient distance and plain view of the section line where people traveled and had a right to be. … Co. v. Brame, 95 U.

Crescent Corporation v. Martin

443 P.2d 111 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1968

In Gillioz v. … In Winick et al. v.

Glasco v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of Corrections

188 P.3d 177 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 2008

Murg, Jr. v. *182 Barnsdall Nursing Home, 2005 OK 73, ¶ 13 , 123 P.3d 21, 25 ; Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶ 22, n. 80 , 989 P.2d 448, 455, n. 30 . … Agency is defined as any office, department, board, commission, or institution in the executive branch of state government. 74 0.$.2001, ~§ 840-1.3(1).

Gypsy Oil Co. v. Green

82 Okla. 147 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 7, 1921

In pulling said tubing, it was necessary for one of the parties engaged in said work to stand on a tubing board constructed in the derrick, a distance of about 10 feet from the ground, and to reach said tubing board it was … Co. v.

Chisholm v. Weise

5 Okla. 217 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1897

(Campbell v. Coonradt, 27 Kan. 704 ; Connaway v. Gore, 27 Kan. 127 ; Burdette v. Cordan, id. 375; Buettinger v. Hurley, 9 Pac. Rep. 197 ). Also that the same doctrine obtains in the state of Iowa, (Ensley v. … Bennett, 37 Iowa, 15 ), and in the state of Nebraska, (Brown v. Feagins, 55 N. W. 1048 ).

Anderst v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

19 Okla. 206 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1907

Board v. Wagner (Ind. Supp.) 38 N. E. 171 ; Marvin v. Seger (Ind. Supp.) 44 N. E. 310 ; Saxon v. State (Ind. Sup.) 18 N. E. 268 ; Cowger v. Land (Ind. Sup.) 12 N. E. 96 ; Harris v. Tomlinson (Ind. Sup.) 30 N. … E. 214 ; Stout v. Turner (Ind. Sup.) 26 N. E. 85 .