Case law

Rockwell International Corp. v. Clay

780 P.2d 700 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1989

The lessee-tenants, who initially protested unsuccessfully before the Tulsa County Board of Equalization [Board], later appealed to the district court in a number of actions which were consolidated for trial. … Cartwright v. Dunbar, Okl., 618 P.2d 900, 904 [1980], and General Motors v. Okl. Cty. Bd. of Equal, Okl., 678 P.2d 233, 235 [1983]. .See infra note 8 for the pertinent provisions of 3 O.S.1981 § 65.17. .

Public Service Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission

688 P.2d 1274 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1984

In Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. … El Paso, in effect, took the rule from the Supreme Court case of Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

York v. Garrison

208 Okla. 123 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1953

O’Reilly, County Atty., 83 Okl. 297 , 201 P. 641 ; Board of Com’rs of Carter County v. Woodford, Consolidated School Dist. … The above-quoted part of the statute was applied to a slightly different fact situation and was discussed at length in the case of School Board of Consolidated School Dist. No. 47, etc., v.

First State Bank of Bristow v. O'Bannon

130 Okla. 206 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 1928

Browne, 69 Mont. 140 , 220 Pac. 114 ; Federal Res. Bank of Richmond v. Peters, 139 Va. 45 , 123 S. E. 379 ; Federal Res. Bank of Richmond v. Bohannon, 141 Va. 285 , 127 S. E. 161 ; Federal Res. Bank v. Quigley (Mo. … Kesl v. Hanover St. Bank, 109 Kan. 776 , 204 Pac. 994 ; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Hanover St. Bank, 109 Kan. 772 , 204 Pac. 992 ; Hawaiian Pineapple Co. v. Browne (Mont.) 220 Pac. 1114 ; Federal Res. Bank v.

Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Co.

178 Okla. 212 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1936

Lowe v. City of Guthrie, 4 Okla. 287 , 44 P. 198 ; Western Cas. & Guar. Ins. Co. v. Board Co. Com’rs, 60 Okla. 140 , 159 P. 665 ; Duke v. Nat’l Surety Co. (Wash.) 227 P. 2 ; Southern Surety Co. v. Cochise Co. … (Ariz.) 233 P. 897 ; Washington Co. v. Stephens (Idaho) 267 P. 225 ; Southern Surety Co. v. Kinney (Ind. App.) 127 N. E. 575 ; Yeargain v. Board of Co. Com’rs, 90 Okla. 38 , 215 P. 619 .

In Re Initiative Petition Number 259, State Question 376

316 P.2d 139 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1957

In Marsh v. … People v. Lawrence, 36 Barb., N.Y., 177, 187." See, also, Norris v. Cross, 25 Okl. 287 , 105 P. 1000 , and Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief and Pension Fund of City of Muskogee v.

Lucas v. Triad Drilling Co.

69 O.B.A.J. 3501 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1998

(Cited with approval, Impson v. Dillard’s Brown-Dunkin Co., 1971 OK ——, 489 P.2d 483, 484 .) ¶ 12 In Stroud Municipal Hospital v. … Dillard’s Brown-Dunkin Co., 1971 OK-, 489 P.2d 483 (employee sales lady injured when involved in an automobile accident while driving to store to take inventory on a Sunday); Christian v.

Poole v. Higgins

44 Okla. 96 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1914

Price et al v. Board of Commissioners, 8 Okla. 121 , 56 Pac. 959 ; Smith v. Boatman, 29 Okla. 818 , 120 Pac. 599 . By the Court: It is so ordered.

Gulick v. Linn

90 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1923

Gotham and. others, Members of the County Election Board of Oaddo County, Oklahoma, Defendants,” enjoining said board and its members from holding on June 26, 1923, an election called by the Governor, and intended to be held … Rickey et al. v. Williams et al. (Wash.) 36 Pac. 480 ; Connor et al. v. Gray et al., 88 Miss. 489 ; Oden v. Barbee et al. (Tex.) 129 S. W. 602 ; Wood v. Ball (Tex.) 166 S. W. 4 ; Wilton v.

Mosley v. Mosley

321 P.2d 421 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1958

Defendant relies primarily upon the decision in the case of Hapke v. … Juckes v. Rogers, 206 Okl. 663 , 246 P.2d 335, 336 .

Superior Smokeless Coal & Mining Co. v. Cattaneo

180 Okla. 135 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1937

In Nichols Transfer & Storage Co. v. … Skelly Oil Co. v. Ellis, 176 Okla. 569 , 56 P. (2d) 891 ; Harris Meat & Produce Co. v. Brown, 177 Okla. 317 , 59 P. (2d) 280 ; Acme Coal Co. v. Manning, supra, and Manahan Drilling Co. v.

Polk v. UNKNOWN TRUSTEES, SUCCESSORS & ASSIGNS, ETC.

298 P.2d 432 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 8, 1956

Cund, Duncan, Brown, Cund & Brown, Duncan, of counsel, for defendants in error. *433 PER CURIAM. George D. Polk and Owen F. … In Whitney v.

Scott v. Morris

129 Okla. 117 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1928

Co. v. Hendrickson, County Treas., 127 Okla. 242 , 260 Pac. 476 ; Bristow Battery Co. v. Payne, 123 Okla. 137 , 252 Pac. 423 ; Eaton, County Treasurer, v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co., 122 Okla. 143 , 261 Pac. 1032 . … Co. v.

Connelly v. Gaffaney

159 Okla. 60 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1932

In the ease of Penny v. … I got it from Brown. Q. Did you pay Brown? A. Yes, sir. Q. Where did you get the money to pay Brown? A.

Taylor v. Freeman

76 Okla. 211 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1919

Preeman, judge of the district court of Carter county, to prohibit such judge from granting or considering a motion for an order directing the county- clerk and secretary of the county election board to produce the records … It appearing the court had jurisdiction to try the election contest, and jurisdiction of the parties, the writ of prohibition must be denied under authority of Harrah v.

Gill v. Haynes

28 Okla. 656 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1911

Board of Com’rs v. Oxley, 8 Okla. 502 , 58 Pac. 651 . … Garner v. Scott, Adm’r, ante, 115 Pac. 789 , an opinion of this court delivered at this term, and Glaser v. Glaser, 13 Okla. 389 , 71 Pac. 944.

North British Mercantile Ins. Co. v. Wright

54 Okla. 712 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 18, 1916

Co. v. Gilbert, supra; Phoenix Life Ins. Co. v. Raddin, 120 U. S. 183 -189, 7 Sup. Ct. 500, 30 L. Ed. 644 ; Northern Ins. Co. v. Grand View Building Assn., supra.” In a very recent case decided by this court, Brown v. … The rule laid down in the third and fourth headnotes in Brown v. Conn. Fire Ins.

Johnson v. Patterson

470 P.2d 1019 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1970

The order revoking a permit to sell non-intoxicating beverages must be based on a ground specifically enumerated in the statute, Jiffy Food Stores, Inc. v. Ferris, Okl., 402 P.2d 252 (1965); Salaney v. … Wray v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., Okl., 442 P.2d 309 (1968); Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Milam, Okl., 393 P.2d 823 (1964).

Heaton v. Schaeffer

34 Okla. 631 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1912

The case of Brown v. … This was so held in Bacon v. Bicknell, 17 Wis. 523 . See, also, Nelson v. Bostwick, 5 Hill [N. Y.] 37 [ 40 Am. Dec. 310 ]; Stehr v. Ollbermann, 49 N. J. Law, 633 [ 10 Atl. 547 ].

Emrick v. State Highway Commission

147 Okla. 252 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1931

Since this cause was briefed this court in Wentz v. Ingenthron, 146 Okla. 165 , 294 Pac. 154 , and in No. 21686, Lew Wentz v. … Citing Albright v. Erickson, 23 Okla. 544 , 102 Pac. 112 . To the same effect is the case of AA'allace, *253 County Treasurer, v. McClendon, 144 Okla. 39 , 289 Pac. 354 .