Case law

Crosbie v. Partridge

85 Okla. 186 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 7, 1922

Ed. 281 ; Gowen v. Harley, 56 Fed. 973, 976, 978 . 979, 6 C. C. A. 190 . 193, 195, 196; Christie-Street Commission Co. v. United States, 136 Fed. 326, 332, 333, 69 , C. C. A. 464, 470, 471: Board of Com’rs v. … The only case we recall where this question could have been presented to this court was in the case of Brown v. Minshall, 83 Okla. 98 , 202 Pac. 1037 .

Graham v. Bishop

428 P.2d 223 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1967

See Harris v. Owenby, 58 Okl. 667 , 160 P. 596 . … Lemmon Co. v.

Hopkins v. Lippert

193 Okla. 144 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1943

Minnehoma Oil Co. v. Florence, 92 Okla. 17 , 217 P. 443 ; Monarch Loan Co. v. Shellenberger, 159 Okla. 247 , 15 P. 2d 53 ; Duroderigo v. Culwell, 52 Okla. 6 , 152 P. 605 ; Brown v. Harmon, 115 Okla. 277 , 242 P. 1047 . … In Duroderigo v.

State v. Price

280 P.3d 943 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 5, 2012

Pate's limited holding and application was later clarified and recognized in Hale v. Board of County Comm'rs of Seminole County, 1979 OK 158, ¶ 3 , 603 P.2d 761 and McCormack v. … Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 1965 OK 206 , 409 P.2d 364 ; Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Milam, 1964 OK 54 , 393 P.2d 823 . . See discussion of Maben v.

Smith v. Hart

156 Okla. 226 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1932

The defendant Brown answered by general denial, and further claiming a lien on said property by reason of a judgment obtained in a suit against J. A. Hart on June 3, 1929. No answer was filed by the Harts. … This court has consistently followed the rule announced in City National Bank v.

Wininger Ex Rel. Wininger v. Day

376 P.2d 211 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1962

Modern Motors v. Elkins, 189 Okl. 134 , 113 P.2d 969 , and Sawyer v. Brown, 108 Okl. 265 , 236 P. 404 . … In Brownell v.

Sapulpa Electric Interurban Ry. Co. v. Broome

93 Okla. 115 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1923

Tulsa Entertainment Co. v. Greenlees, 85 Okla. 113 , 205 Pac. 179 . … In Boling v.

Missouri State Life Insurance v. Everett

167 Okla. 350 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 1934

King Auto Service v. Hodges, 143 Okla. 260 , 288 P. 483 ; Okla. Hospital v. Brown, 87 Okla. 46 , 208 P. 785 ; and Mead v. Chickasha Gas & Electric Co., 137 Okla. 74 , 278 P. 286 . … Shunkamolah et al. v.

Inner Shoe Tire Co. v. Mueller

108 Okla. 229 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 17, 1925

Brown v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn., 52 Okla. 392 , 153 Pac. 173 ; Spalding v. Howard, 51 Okla. 502 , 152 Pac. 106 ; Coyle v. Ark. V. & W. Ry. Co., 41 Okla. 648 , 139 Pac. 294 ; Miller Bros. v. … In Holmes v.

Murry v. Merchants Southwest Transfer & Storage Co.

98 Okla. 270 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1924

. *272 There is also testimony in the record to the effect that the board of directors of the defendant corporation never made the said S. A. … First State Bank of Texola v. Terrell, 44 Okla. 719 , 145 Pac. 1140 . It is next contended that the court erred in giving instruction No. 5.

Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. McFee

198 Okla. 37 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1946

In Hurley v. … Board of County Commissioners of Kiowa County v. Kiowa National Bank, 166 Okla. 255 , 27 P. 2d 338 . The cross-petition in error of Leonard McFee is dismissed.

Norris v. Norris

695 P.2d 506 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1984

In the case of Phillips v. H.A. … Pierce v. Pierce, 609 P.2d 732 (Okla.1979); Huchteman v. Huchteman, 557 P.2d 427 (Okla.1976); Lemons v. Lemons, 205 Okla. 485 , 238 P.2d 790 (1951). 4 .

Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Satterfield

178 Okla. 418 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1936

Deep Rock Oil Co. v. Evans, 167 Okla. 66 , 28 P. (2d) 7 ; Shell Pet. Corp. v. Patton, 167 Okla. 246 , 29 P. (2d) 86 ; Boardman & Co. v. Clark, 166 Okla. 194 , 26 P. (2d) 906 ; Brown Bros. v. … In Deep Rock Oil Co. v.

Sawyer & Austin Lumber Co. v. Champlain Lumber Co.

16 Okla. 90 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 7, 1905

Johnson et al. v. Johnson, 24 Pac. 1098 ; Pattie v. Wilson, 25 Kan. 329 ; Washington v. Hobart, 17 Kan. 277 . … Frame v. Ryel, 14 Okla. 536 ; Board of Washita County v. Hubble, 8 Okla. 169 ; B. K. & S. W. Ry. Co. v. Grimes, 36 Kan. 241 ; Ryen v. Madden, 26 Pac. 680 ; Pelton v. Bauer, 35 Pac. 918 ; Eddy v.

Oklahoma City v. Haynes

116 Okla. 227 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1926

So too where a munic^ ipal board by its rule makes suspension a joint matter between itself and the chief of police, suspension of a policeman by the board alone, pending the hearing of charges of misconduct, is void, and … This rule seems to have been followed in the case of Louisville v. Gorley (Ky. App.) 80 S. W. 203 ; Bringgold v. Spokane (Wash.) 67 Pac. 612 .

Brinson-Kirtley Zinc & Lead Co. v. Kirtley

110 Okla. 227 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1925

Thyssen v. Davenport Ice Co., 134 Ia. 749 , 112 N. W. 177 , 13 L. R. A. (N. S.) 572; Flanders v. Cobb, 88 Me. 488 , 34 Atl. 277 , 51 A. S. R. 410; Anderson v. Wetter, 103 Me. 257 , 69 Atl. 105 , 15 L. R. A. (N. … S.) 1003; Curtis v. Ford, 78 Tex. 262 , 14 S. W. 614 , 10 L. R. A. 529.

Town of Reydon v. Anderson

649 P.2d 541 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 27, 1982

In Langston City v. … Blake, 19 N.W.2d 220, 223 (1945); Board of Com’rs. of Oklahoma County v. Young, 186 Okl. 182 , 97 P.2d 6, 10 (1939); State v. City of Manhatten, 115 Kan. 794 , 225 P. 85 (1924). 6 .

Kunze v. Wilkerson

426 P.2d 340 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1967

In Brown v. … In Teuscher v.

Pitts v. Allen

138 Okla. 295 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 1928

Co0. v. Taylor, 87 Okla. 140 , 209 Pac. 749 . … See, also, Taylor v. Cole (Cal.) 257 Pac. 40 ; State ex rel. Kansas City v. Trimble (Mo.) 298 S. W. 883 -37; State ex rel. Strait v. Brooks (Mo.) 293. S. W. 471; City of Ft. Worth v. Davidson (Tex.) 298 S.

In Re Asssessment of Property of Kennedy

167 Okla. 248 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1934

S. 1931, provide the procedure in appeals from the board of county commissioners. … In the case of Hart v.