Case law

Markle v. Stekoll

112 Okla. 287 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1925

of Tulsa Pipe & Supply Company of Tulsa, Okla., for the purchase of 2,000 feet of casing, which agreement was evidenced by a telegram sent by the City National Bank of Ok-mulgee, Okla., on behalf of the plaintiff, to Ben Brown … Kellogg Bridge Co. v. Hamilton, 110 U. S. 108 , 28 L. Ed. 886 ; Stanford v. Nat. Drill Mfg. Co., 28 Okla. 441 , 114 Pac. 734 ; Obenchain & Boyer v. Incorporated Town of Roff, 29 Okla. 211 , 116 Pac. 782 .

Mosley v. Mosley

321 P.2d 421 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1958

Defendant relies primarily upon the decision in the case of Hapke v. … Juckes v. Rogers, 206 Okl. 663 , 246 P.2d 335, 336 .

Dawson v. Tindell

733 P.2d 407 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1987

D & H Co., Inc. v. Schultz, 579 P.2d 821 (Okl.1978); State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. Brown, 519 P.2d 491 (Okl.1974); Lenn v. Miller, 403 P.2d 458 (Okl.1965). … This Court in Onstott v.

MARBY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. Mitchell

288 P.2d 1108 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1955

V. … Slick, 167 Okl. 639 , 31 P.2d 110 , and Swift & Co. v. Brown, 202 Okl. 572 , 216 P.2d 294 . Award sustained. JOHNSON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and CORN, DAVISON and HALLEY, JJ., concur.

Johnson v. Johnson

201 Okla. 268 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1949

Maynard, Ex’r, v. Central Nat. Bank of Okmulgee, 185 Okla. 272 , 91 P. 2d 653 ; Morton v. Williams, 190 Okla. 374 , 123 P. 2d 960 ; Maynard v. Taylor, 185 Okla. 268 , 91 P. 2d 649 ; Fibikowski v. … Johnson, now Brown, and made an offer of $2,500. They referred the representative of the oil company to the plaintiffs.

Sawyer & Austin Lumber Co. v. Champlain Lumber Co.

16 Okla. 90 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 7, 1905

Johnson et al. v. Johnson, 24 Pac. 1098 ; Pattie v. Wilson, 25 Kan. 329 ; Washington v. Hobart, 17 Kan. 277 . … Frame v. Ryel, 14 Okla. 536 ; Board of Washita County v. Hubble, 8 Okla. 169 ; B. K. & S. W. Ry. Co. v. Grimes, 36 Kan. 241 ; Ryen v. Madden, 26 Pac. 680 ; Pelton v. Bauer, 35 Pac. 918 ; Eddy v.

Inner Shoe Tire Co. v. Mueller

108 Okla. 229 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 17, 1925

Brown v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn., 52 Okla. 392 , 153 Pac. 173 ; Spalding v. Howard, 51 Okla. 502 , 152 Pac. 106 ; Coyle v. Ark. V. & W. Ry. Co., 41 Okla. 648 , 139 Pac. 294 ; Miller Bros. v. … In Holmes v.

Application of Oklahoma Turnpike Authority

416 P.2d 860 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1966

See Application of Oklahoma Planning and Resources Board, Okl., 274 P.2d 61 ; and Application of Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma, supra. … See City of Albuquerque v. Gott, 73 N.M. 439 , 389 P.2d 207 , referred to in majority opinion herein and in our opinion in Application of the Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma, supra. I concur specially.

Farmers Co-Operative Ass'n v. Shaw

171 Okla. 358 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1935

Levin v. Standard Fashion Co., 4 N. Y. Supp. 867 ; Bigelow v. American For-cite Power Mfg. Co., 39 Hun. (N. Y.) 599. See, also. Squire v. Wright, 1 Mo. App. 172 ; Dary v. The Caroline Miller (D. C.) 36 F. 507 ; 6 L. R. … Jackson v. Independent School District (Iowa) 77 N. W. 860 ; Chisholm v. Preferred Bankers’ Life Assur. Co., 112 Mich. 50 , 70 N. W. 415 ; Howard v. Vaughan-Monnig Shoe Co., 82 Mo. App. 405 .

Fooshee Brunson v. Smith

34 Okla. 247 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1912

Collins v. Wagoner, 20 Wis. 52 ; Stoppenbach v. Zohrlaut et al., 21 Wis. 390 ; Parsell v. Smyers, 7 Ark. 55 ; Brenner v. Bigelow, 8 Kan. 496 . The case of Board of Commissioners v. … In Holden v.

Christner v. Christner

203 Okla. 581 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1950

In Hutchings v. … Co., 41 Okla. 488 , 138 P. 1029 ; Cressler v. Brown, 79 Okla. 170 , 192 P. 417 . Appeal dismissed.

Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Satterfield

178 Okla. 418 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1936

Deep Rock Oil Co. v. Evans, 167 Okla. 66 , 28 P. (2d) 7 ; Shell Pet. Corp. v. Patton, 167 Okla. 246 , 29 P. (2d) 86 ; Boardman & Co. v. Clark, 166 Okla. 194 , 26 P. (2d) 906 ; Brown Bros. v. … In Deep Rock Oil Co. v.

In Re Asssessment of Property of Kennedy

167 Okla. 248 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1934

S. 1931, provide the procedure in appeals from the board of county commissioners. … In the case of Hart v.

Kremer v. Stephens

55 Okla. 568 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1916

Co. v. … Colcord v. Conger, 10 Okla. 458 , 62 Pac. 276 ; Barnes v. Territory, 19 Okla. 373 , 91 Pac. 848 ; Pitchlynn v. Cherry, 32 Okla. 77 , 121 Pac. 196 ; Tulsa St. Ry. Co. v.

Poole v. Higgins

44 Okla. 96 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1914

Price et al v. Board of Commissioners, 8 Okla. 121 , 56 Pac. 959 ; Smith v. Boatman, 29 Okla. 818 , 120 Pac. 599 . By the Court: It is so ordered.

McGinnis v. Wood

4 Okla. 499 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 4, 1896

In Whitehead v. Tapp, 69 Mo., the court held that “any man who has a wife is the head of a family within the meaning of the homestead act.” And in Brown v. … In McPhee v.

In re St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co.

142 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1929

Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a corporation, against illegal and excessive tax levies for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1928, by the county excise board of Tulsa county. Protestee appeals. … We discussed this identical question in cause No. 20142, Coggeshall & Co. v. Smiley, 142 Okla. 8 , 285 Pac. 48 , and there held the levy excessive and illegal.

International Harvester Co. v. Lawyer

56 Okla. 207 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1916

W. 356 ; Clark v Ralls, 50 Iowa, 275 ; Woodbridge v. Brown, 149 N. C. 299 , 62 S. E. 1076 . The plaintiif cites Mechem on Sales, vol. 2, p. 1243; 30 Ency. of Law, p. 142; Whitehead v. Ryder, 139 Mass. 366 , 31 N. … Rep. 455 ; Tacoma Coal Co. v. Bradley et al., 2 Wash. 600 , 27 Pac. 454 , 26 Am. St. Rep. 890 ; Barnum Wire & Iron Works v. Seley, 34 Tex. Civ. App. 47 , 77 S. W. 827 ; Brown v. Freeman, 79 Ala. 406 ; Frey v.

Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. McFee

198 Okla. 37 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1946

In Hurley v. … Board of County Commissioners of Kiowa County v. Kiowa National Bank, 166 Okla. 255 , 27 P. 2d 338 . The cross-petition in error of Leonard McFee is dismissed.

Paul v. N. L. Industries, Inc.

624 P.2d 68 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1980

However defendant urges us to look again at Walton v. Tull, 234 Ark. 882 , 356 S.W.2d 20 (1962) which we used in deciding Laubach. … His law review article refers to at least three states which allow the negligence of absent tortfeasors to be considered: Kansas, Brown v. Keill, 224 Kan. 195 , 580 P.2d 867 [1978]; Wisconsin, Ross v.