Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

1.73s

  • Cooper v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety

    917 P.2d 466 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 1996

    Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 833 P.2d 1218, 1228 (Okla.1992). If the legislative intent is clear from the plain language, there is no room for statutory construction. Wiley Electric, Inc. v.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Mid-Union Drilling Co. v. Graham

    184 Okla. 514 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1939

    In Associated Employers’ Reciprocal v. … But it is apparent that we review originally awards presumed to be proper, whereas some of the courts review by appeal errors of J;he court or board. We are cited to Gauthier v. Penobscot Chemical Fiber Co.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hunter v. Pepis

    195 Okla. 660 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 5, 1945

    The judgment in default as against Mabel Hunter and Adella Brown was vacated and answers and cross-petitions were filed by these defendants and interveners. … Haley v. Wyte, 169 Okla. 406 , 38 P. 2d 910 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Walker

    168 Okla. 355 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 8, 1934

    Board of Railroad Commissioners, 76 Mont. 305 , 247 P. 162 , in holding that the order of the board requiring the carrier to construct a spur track was void because not made with due process, it is said: “When we conceive … Board of Supervisors (Iowa) 180 N. W. 988 .

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Ford v. Holt

    191 Okla. 534 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1942

    En route to the job plaintiff was thrown from the running board of the subforeman’s car and sustained serious personal injuries. … J., CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, GIBSON, and DAVISON, JJ., concur. HURST and ARNOLD, JJ., absent.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Steffens Ice Cream Co. v. Jarvis

    132 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 5, 1928

    Louis Mining & Smelting Co. v. Industrial Commission, 113 Okla. 179 , 241 Pac. 170 , which quotes from the Oklahoma Hospital v. … V. C. J., and HARRISON, PHELPS, LESTER, HUNT, and RILEY, JJ., concur.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • In Re Initiative Petition No. 13 of Oklahoma City

    369 P.2d 458 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 27, 1962

    In Caruth v. … Burns v. Linn, 49 Okl. 526 , 153 Pac. 826 , Ann.Cas.1918B, 139; Owen v. City of Tulsa, 27 Okl. 264 , 111 Pac. 320 ; Bodine v. [City of] Oklahoma City, 79 Okl. 106 , 187 Pac. 209 ; Watts, Mayor v. State ex rel.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Stapleton Motor Sales Co. v. Oates

    109 Okla. 173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1924

    It was held in Hanna v. … Stapleton of Stapleton-Brown Company of Port Worth, Tex.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. Watkins

    170 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 8, 1935

    And it is held in Render et al. v. … Board of Commissioners v. Western, etc., Co., 122 Okla. 244 , 254 P. 741 ; Missouri, K. & O. Coach Lines v. Benton, 157 Okla. 10 , 10 P. (2d) 451 . It is held in Pyle v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mid-Continent Pipe & Supply Co. v. State Industrial Commission

    182 Okla. 428 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1938

    BAYLESS, V. C. J. The State Industrial Commission in making an award of compensation to E. R. … Malosh v. Mid-Continent Pipe & Supply Company — injured 8-19-36.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Executive Committee of the American Legion, Department of Oklahoma v. Hardy

    300 P.2d 663 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1956

    See Grubb v. Smiley, 142 Okl. 19 , 285 P. 38 , and other cases appearing in 11 Okl.Dig., under Pleading, together with Lawton Pressed Brick & Tile Co. v. Ross-Kellar Triple Pressure Brick Mach. … . & Pr., appearing in Bracken v. Stone, 20 Okl. 613 , 95 P. 236, 237, 238 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Fischer v. Oklahoma City

    198 Okla. 22 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 24, 1946

    At the outset they are familiar with our decisions in Ramsey v. Leeper, 168 Okla. 43 , 31 P. 2d 852 , and Harn v. … In addition, the weight of authority, including our opinion in Travis v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. State Ex Rel. Freeling

    75 Okla. 42 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 1919

    Co. v. Anderson, 50 Fla. 501 , 39 South. 392 ; Stories Eq. Pl., sec. 271. … In the case of Belknap v. Schild, 161 U. S. 10 , 16 Sup. Ct. 443, 40 L.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States Supply Co. v. Gillespie

    65 Okla. 198 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1917

    See, also, Bank v. Brown, 85 Tex. 80 , 23 S. W. 862 . In Stitt et al. v. Namakan Lumber Co., 95 Minn. 91 , 103 N. … (Mass.) 378; Lincoln v. S. & S. Ry Co., 23 Wend. (N. Y.) 425; Hicks v. Foster, 13 Barb. (N. Y.) 663; Falk v. Waterman, 49 Cal. 224 ; Earl v. Tupper, 45 Vt. 275 ; Landa v. Obert, 45 Tex. 539 ; Jandt v. South, 2 Dak. 46 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma City v. Vahlberg, Co. Treas

    197 Okla. 613 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1946

    Schmidt, the owner of street improvement bonds, against the board of county commissioners of Oklahoma county and W. F. … Dickinson v. Tidd, supra; Prince v. Ypsilanti Sav. Bk., supra; McGrath v. Oklahoma City, 156 Okla. 34 , 9 P. 2d 711 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. City of Shawnee

    39 Okla. 728 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1913

    facts These questions seem to be definitely settled by the decisions of this court; and it thus appears: (1) That a motion for new trial is unauthorized in such cases, and the appeal should have been from the judgment (Board … Boulanger v. Midland Valley Mercantile Co., 36 Okla. 120 , 128 Pac. 113 ; Reed v. Woolly, 31 Okla. 783 , 123 Pac. 1121 ; Doorley v. Buford & George Mfg. Co., 5 Okla. 594 , 49 Pac. 936 ; Williams v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma Union Ry. Co. v. Dascus

    133 Okla. 83 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1928

    This case is governed by rule, or rather analogous principles, set forth in the case of Adams Oil, Gas & Development Co. v. Hivick, 74 Okla. 117 , 176 Pac. 938 ; and the case of Cherry v. … Brown, 79 Okla. 215 , 192 Pac. 227 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • First Nat. Bank of Ardmore v. Com'rs of Land Office

    127 Okla. 190 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1927

    . & Loan, 61 Okla. 230 , 157 Pac. 366 ; McKee v. Howard, 38 Okla. 422 , 134 Pac. 44 ; McAdams v. Latham, 21 Okla. 511 , 96 Pac. 584 ; Jenkins v. Brown, 46 Okla. 132 , 148 Pac. 697 .” … Brown v. First National Bank, 35 Okla. 726 , 130 Pac. 140 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma City v. District Court

    168 Okla. 235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1934

    It is contended herein that the language used by this court in Oklahoma Railway Co. v. Boyd, 140 Okla. 45 , 282 P. 157 , and Board of Com’rs of Kiowa County v. Kiowa Nat. … In Board of Com’rs of Kiowa County v. Kiowa Nat.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Dimmers v. Regan

    68 Okla. 322 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 20, 1918

    Rumbaugh v. Rumbaugh, 39 Okla. 445 , 135 Pac. 937 ; Wade v. Ray, 41 Okla. 641 . 139 Pac. 116 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Brown, 55 Okla. 173 , 154 Pac. 1161 ; Proctor v. Capps; 67 Okla. 130 , 169 Pac. 894 . … Ry Co. v. Crider, 52 Okla. 487 , 153 Pac. 63 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.