Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.73s
Cooper v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety
917 P.2d 466 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 1996
Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 833 P.2d 1218, 1228 (Okla.1992). If the legislative intent is clear from the plain language, there is no room for statutory construction. Wiley Electric, Inc. v.
Cited 46 timesPublishedMid-Union Drilling Co. v. Graham
184 Okla. 514 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1939
In Associated Employers’ Reciprocal v. … But it is apparent that we review originally awards presumed to be proper, whereas some of the courts review by appeal errors of J;he court or board. We are cited to Gauthier v. Penobscot Chemical Fiber Co.
Cited 6 timesPublished195 Okla. 660 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 5, 1945
The judgment in default as against Mabel Hunter and Adella Brown was vacated and answers and cross-petitions were filed by these defendants and interveners. … Haley v. Wyte, 169 Okla. 406 , 38 P. 2d 910 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedH. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Walker
168 Okla. 355 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 8, 1934
Board of Railroad Commissioners, 76 Mont. 305 , 247 P. 162 , in holding that the order of the board requiring the carrier to construct a spur track was void because not made with due process, it is said: “When we conceive … Board of Supervisors (Iowa) 180 N. W. 988 .
Cited 22 timesPublished191 Okla. 534 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1942
En route to the job plaintiff was thrown from the running board of the subforeman’s car and sustained serious personal injuries. … J., CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, GIBSON, and DAVISON, JJ., concur. HURST and ARNOLD, JJ., absent.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSteffens Ice Cream Co. v. Jarvis
132 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 5, 1928
Louis Mining & Smelting Co. v. Industrial Commission, 113 Okla. 179 , 241 Pac. 170 , which quotes from the Oklahoma Hospital v. … V. C. J., and HARRISON, PHELPS, LESTER, HUNT, and RILEY, JJ., concur.
Cited 30 timesPublishedIn Re Initiative Petition No. 13 of Oklahoma City
369 P.2d 458 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 27, 1962
In Caruth v. … Burns v. Linn, 49 Okl. 526 , 153 Pac. 826 , Ann.Cas.1918B, 139; Owen v. City of Tulsa, 27 Okl. 264 , 111 Pac. 320 ; Bodine v. [City of] Oklahoma City, 79 Okl. 106 , 187 Pac. 209 ; Watts, Mayor v. State ex rel.
Cited 5 timesPublishedStapleton Motor Sales Co. v. Oates
109 Okla. 173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1924
It was held in Hanna v. … Stapleton of Stapleton-Brown Company of Port Worth, Tex.
Cited 3 timesPublished170 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 8, 1935
And it is held in Render et al. v. … Board of Commissioners v. Western, etc., Co., 122 Okla. 244 , 254 P. 741 ; Missouri, K. & O. Coach Lines v. Benton, 157 Okla. 10 , 10 P. (2d) 451 . It is held in Pyle v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMid-Continent Pipe & Supply Co. v. State Industrial Commission
182 Okla. 428 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1938
BAYLESS, V. C. J. The State Industrial Commission in making an award of compensation to E. R. … Malosh v. Mid-Continent Pipe & Supply Company — injured 8-19-36.
Cited 0 timesPublishedExecutive Committee of the American Legion, Department of Oklahoma v. Hardy
300 P.2d 663 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1956
See Grubb v. Smiley, 142 Okl. 19 , 285 P. 38 , and other cases appearing in 11 Okl.Dig., under Pleading, together with Lawton Pressed Brick & Tile Co. v. Ross-Kellar Triple Pressure Brick Mach. … . & Pr., appearing in Bracken v. Stone, 20 Okl. 613 , 95 P. 236, 237, 238 .
Cited 4 timesPublished198 Okla. 22 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 24, 1946
At the outset they are familiar with our decisions in Ramsey v. Leeper, 168 Okla. 43 , 31 P. 2d 852 , and Harn v. … In addition, the weight of authority, including our opinion in Travis v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedSouthwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. State Ex Rel. Freeling
75 Okla. 42 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 1919
Co. v. Anderson, 50 Fla. 501 , 39 South. 392 ; Stories Eq. Pl., sec. 271. … In the case of Belknap v. Schild, 161 U. S. 10 , 16 Sup. Ct. 443, 40 L.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Supply Co. v. Gillespie
65 Okla. 198 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1917
See, also, Bank v. Brown, 85 Tex. 80 , 23 S. W. 862 . In Stitt et al. v. Namakan Lumber Co., 95 Minn. 91 , 103 N. … (Mass.) 378; Lincoln v. S. & S. Ry Co., 23 Wend. (N. Y.) 425; Hicks v. Foster, 13 Barb. (N. Y.) 663; Falk v. Waterman, 49 Cal. 224 ; Earl v. Tupper, 45 Vt. 275 ; Landa v. Obert, 45 Tex. 539 ; Jandt v. South, 2 Dak. 46 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedOklahoma City v. Vahlberg, Co. Treas
197 Okla. 613 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1946
Schmidt, the owner of street improvement bonds, against the board of county commissioners of Oklahoma county and W. F. … Dickinson v. Tidd, supra; Prince v. Ypsilanti Sav. Bk., supra; McGrath v. Oklahoma City, 156 Okla. 34 , 9 P. 2d 711 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedChicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. City of Shawnee
39 Okla. 728 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1913
facts These questions seem to be definitely settled by the decisions of this court; and it thus appears: (1) That a motion for new trial is unauthorized in such cases, and the appeal should have been from the judgment (Board … Boulanger v. Midland Valley Mercantile Co., 36 Okla. 120 , 128 Pac. 113 ; Reed v. Woolly, 31 Okla. 783 , 123 Pac. 1121 ; Doorley v. Buford & George Mfg. Co., 5 Okla. 594 , 49 Pac. 936 ; Williams v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedOklahoma Union Ry. Co. v. Dascus
133 Okla. 83 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1928
This case is governed by rule, or rather analogous principles, set forth in the case of Adams Oil, Gas & Development Co. v. Hivick, 74 Okla. 117 , 176 Pac. 938 ; and the case of Cherry v. … Brown, 79 Okla. 215 , 192 Pac. 227 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedFirst Nat. Bank of Ardmore v. Com'rs of Land Office
127 Okla. 190 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1927
. & Loan, 61 Okla. 230 , 157 Pac. 366 ; McKee v. Howard, 38 Okla. 422 , 134 Pac. 44 ; McAdams v. Latham, 21 Okla. 511 , 96 Pac. 584 ; Jenkins v. Brown, 46 Okla. 132 , 148 Pac. 697 .” … Brown v. First National Bank, 35 Okla. 726 , 130 Pac. 140 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedOklahoma City v. District Court
168 Okla. 235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1934
It is contended herein that the language used by this court in Oklahoma Railway Co. v. Boyd, 140 Okla. 45 , 282 P. 157 , and Board of Com’rs of Kiowa County v. Kiowa Nat. … In Board of Com’rs of Kiowa County v. Kiowa Nat.
Cited 17 timesPublished68 Okla. 322 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 20, 1918
Rumbaugh v. Rumbaugh, 39 Okla. 445 , 135 Pac. 937 ; Wade v. Ray, 41 Okla. 641 . 139 Pac. 116 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Brown, 55 Okla. 173 , 154 Pac. 1161 ; Proctor v. Capps; 67 Okla. 130 , 169 Pac. 894 . … Ry Co. v. Crider, 52 Okla. 487 , 153 Pac. 63 .
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna