Case law

Bennett v. Hall

431 P.2d 339 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 23, 1967

See Acme Cab Co. v. Brown, 195 Okl. 164 , 156 P.2d 367 ; Jay Nuckolls Truck Line, Inc. v. Stephens, Admx., Okl., 380 P.2d 248 . … Hansen v. Cunningham, supra; Bishop’s Restaurant, Inc., of Tulsa, v. Whomble, Okl., 355 P.2d 560 . More recently, in Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v.

Republic Natural Gas Company v. Melson

274 P.2d 543 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1954

Wilhite v. Brin, 178 Okl. 339 , 62 P.2d 1240 ; Render v. Richardson, 168 Okl. 122 , 31 P.2d 923 ; Graf Packing Co. v. Pelphrey, 171 Okl. 416 , 42 P.2d 889 .” … Bucktrot v. Partridge, 130 Okl. 122 , 265 P. 768 ; John A. Brown Co. v. Clause, 205 Okl. 122 , 235 P.2d 680 .

Sand Springs Ry. Co. v. Baldridge

60 Okla. 102 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1916

Co. v. Northern P. Ry. Co., 31 Mont. 502 , 78 Pac. 1036 ; New Haven, etc., Co. v. Quintard, 6 Abb. Prac. N. S. (N. Y.) 128. … Bank v. Walworth, 22 Okla. 878 , 98 Pac. 917 ; Ft. Smith & W. R. Co. v. Collins, 26 Okla. 82 , 108 Pac. 550 ; Finch v. Brown, 27 Okla. 217 , 111 Pac. 391 ; Redus v. Mattison, 30 Okla. 720 , 121 Pac. 253 ; Chambers v.

State Ex Rel. Dabney v. Johnson

122 Okla. 241 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1927

Our Constitution .prescribes certain limitations governing the right of eminent domain, among which is the necessity for th’e payment of just compensation, which compensation shall be ascertained by a board of commissioners … In Arthur v.

Price Miller v. Ratcliffe

47 Okla. 370 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1915

National Surety Co. v. Oklahoma Presbyterian College for Girls, 38 Okla. 429 , 132 Pac. 652 . … In the case of Boynton et al. v.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Houts

420 P.2d 498 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1966

In support of his Proposition No. 1, that disbarment is not compulsory, Respondent invites our attention to Baker v. … At the time the instant case was being considered by the Executive Council (now Board of Governors) there was no provision for a hearing or authority to recommend, other than disbarment. *501 Since this case is controlled

Dobry v. Dobry

262 P.2d 691 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1953

The only case, of which we are aware, in which such an agreement has been before this court, is Guaranty Laundry Co. v. Pulliam, 198 Okl. 667 , 181 P.2d 1007, 1009 , 2 A.L.R.2d 738 . … J., JOHNSON, V. C. J., and CORN, DAVISON, O’NEAL and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

Fischer v. Oklahoma City

198 Okla. 22 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 24, 1946

At the outset they are familiar with our decisions in Ramsey v. Leeper, 168 Okla. 43 , 31 P. 2d 852 , and Harn v. … In addition, the weight of authority, including our opinion in Travis v.

Alexander v. Samuels

177 Okla. 323 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1936

A. 414; Munday v. Munday (Va.) 178 S. E. 917 , 98 A. L. R. 187; Davis v. King, 89 N. C. 441 ; Goldstein v. Hammell, 236 Pa. 305 , 84 Atl. 772 ; Russell v. … The defendants rely on and quote the language from Walker v. Brown, 43 Okla. 144 . 141 P. 681 , and Wilson v. Greer, 50 Okla. 387 , 151 P. 629 , but these cases were overruled by implication in Blundell v.

R. & R. Motor Co. v. Kings, Inc.

169 Okla. 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1934

Cherry v. Brown, 79 Okla. 215 , 192 P. 227 , 13 A. L. R. 92; Harris v. First National Bank, 140 Okla. 269 , 282 P. 1097 . … Whitling v. Parshall, 120 Okla. 121 , 252 P. 395 . The complaining party must comply with section 792, C. O. S. 1921 (O.

Knight v. State Ex Rel. Henry

35 Okla. 375 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1913

State, 45 Ark. 59 ; Norfolk et al. v. People, 43 Ill. 9 ; Stokes et al. v. People, 63 Ill. 489 ; Gallagher et al. v. People, 88 Ill. 335 ; Rubush v. State, 112 Ind. 107 , 13 N. E. 877 ; State v. … Brown et al., 16 Iowa, 314 ; State v. Ryan et al., 23 Iowa, 406 ; Commonwealth v. Branch, 64 Ky. (1 Bush) 59 ; Ramey, etc., v. Commonwealth, 83 Ky. 534 ; Id., 7 Ky. Law Rep. 704 ; State v. Plazencia, 6 Rob.

Hallam v. Bailey

66 Okla. 46 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1917

Brown et al. v. Wilson et al., 58 Okla. 392 , 160 Pac. 94 , L. R. A. 1917B, 1184. But the defendants claim that the contract is executed. It certainly cannot be said to be executed on the part of the corporation. … Wood v. French, 39 Okla. 685 , 136 Pac. 734 ; Powers v. Rude, 14 Okla. 381 , 79 Pac. 89 ; Hunter Realty Co. v. Spencer et al., 21 Okla. 155 , 95 Pac. 757 , 17 L. R. A. (N. S.) 622.

Deere v. Gilmore

158 Okla. 217 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 19, 1932

Dodson v. Middleton, 38 Okla. 763 , 135 P. 368 ; Group v. Jones, 44 Okla. 344 , 144 P. 377 ; Fulp v. Squires, 77 Okla. 244 , 187 P. 921 ; Glory v. Bagby, 79 Okla. 155 , 188 P. 881 ; Wray v. … Howard, 79 Okla. 223 , 192 P. 584 ; Tiger v. Brown, 130 Okla. 83 , 265 P. 124 ; Stolfa v. Gaines, 140 Okla. 292 , 283 P. 653 ; Givens v. Jones, 158 Okla. 124 , 12 P. (2d) 892 .

Murphy v. McElroy

185 Okla. 388 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 31, 1939

Pereira v. Pereira, 156 Cal. 1, 4 , 103 P. 488 , 23 L. R. A. (N.S.) 880, 134 Am. St. Rep. 107 ; Walker v. Walker, 14 Cal. App. 487, 493 , 112 P. 479 .” See, also, Brown v. Brown (Cal. … In Hensley v.

Kelly v. Watkins

170 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 8, 1935

And it is held in Render et al. v. … Board of Commissioners v. Western, etc., Co., 122 Okla. 244 , 254 P. 741 ; Missouri, K. & O. Coach Lines v. Benton, 157 Okla. 10 , 10 P. (2d) 451 . It is held in Pyle v.

BD. OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS v. ASSOC. OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS OF OKLA. SELF-INSUR. GROUP

2014 OK 87 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 2014

COMMISSIONERS v. ASSOC. OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS OF OKLA. SELF-INSUR. … BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DELAWARE COUNTY AND SHERIFF OF DELAWARE COUNTY, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF OKLAHOMA SELF- INSURANCE GROUP, Defendant/Appellant.

Matter of Estate of Katschor

543 P.2d 560 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1975

Co. v. Wayman, 169 Okl. 534 , 37 P.2d 976, 978 , 97 A.L.R. 854 (1934). Brown v. Chaddick, 197 Okl. 515 , 172 P.2d 996 (1946). … Co. v. Williams, 129 Ky. 515 , 112 S.W. 651 (1908); 17 Am.Jur.2d Continuance § 10 p. 128. In State v.

Hill v. New

88 Okla. 208 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1923

Co. v. Lilly. 52 Okla. 727 , 153 Pac. 810 ; Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Rainey, 122 Ga. 307 , 50 S. E. 88 , 106 Am. St. Rep. 134 ; Nunn v. Georgia Railroad, 71 Ga. 710 , 51 Am. Rep. 284 Nichols v. Chicago, W. M. Ry. … Co. v. Kendrick (Tex.) 32 S. W. 42 ; Sevier v. Vicksburg & Meridian R. R. Co., 61 Miss, 8, 48 Am. Rep. 74 ; Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Alexander (Tex. Civ. App.) 30 S. W. 113 .

Hughes v. City of Oklahoma City

771 P.2d 1010 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1989

Sooner Construction Company v. Brown, 544 P.2d 500 (Okla.1975). This finding of fact is based on the trial court’s consideration of the expert opinions presented at trial. Meadow Gold Dairies v. … Co., Inc. v. Death of Parrent, 562 P.2d 501 (Okla.1977); Parks v. Norman Mun. Hosp., 684 P.2d 548 (Okla.1984).

Edward C. Hofstra Co. v. Hofstra Mfg. Co.

123 Okla. 3 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1926

Co. v. June Mfg. Co. 41 L. … Justice Brown in Brown Chemical Co. v. Meyer, 139 U. S. 546 , 35 L.