Case law

Deere v. Gilmore

158 Okla. 217 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 19, 1932

Dodson v. Middleton, 38 Okla. 763 , 135 P. 368 ; Group v. Jones, 44 Okla. 344 , 144 P. 377 ; Fulp v. Squires, 77 Okla. 244 , 187 P. 921 ; Glory v. Bagby, 79 Okla. 155 , 188 P. 881 ; Wray v. … Howard, 79 Okla. 223 , 192 P. 584 ; Tiger v. Brown, 130 Okla. 83 , 265 P. 124 ; Stolfa v. Gaines, 140 Okla. 292 , 283 P. 653 ; Givens v. Jones, 158 Okla. 124 , 12 P. (2d) 892 .

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Criner

41 Okla. 256 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 23, 1913

Co. v. Kellogg, 94 U. S. 469 , 24 L. … Co. v. Hall, 53 Ark. 7 , 13 S. W. 138 ; Chicago & E. I. R. Co. v. Donworth, 203 Ill. 192, 197 , 67 N. E. 797 ; Bates Machinery Co. v. Crowley, 115 Ill. App. 540 ; Whitman v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry.

Depue v. Barsh Truck Lines

493 P.2d 80 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 18, 1972

In Oklahoma Planning and Resources Board v. … Planning and Resources Board v.

Purcell v. Corder

33 Okla. 68 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1912

Co. v. Mountain Park Stock Farm Co., supra; Wey et al. v. City Bank of Hobart et al., 29 Okla. 313 , 116 Pac. 943 . In Logan v. Brown, 20 Okla. 334 , 95 Pac. 441 , 20 L. R. A. (N. … Browne, Stat. Fr., sec. 463, cas. cit. The same remarks will apply with equal force here.” See to the same effect, in support of the right of specific performance as to wills, Mundorff et ux. v.

Executive Committee of the American Legion, Department of Oklahoma v. Hardy

300 P.2d 663 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1956

See Grubb v. Smiley, 142 Okl. 19 , 285 P. 38 , and other cases appearing in 11 Okl.Dig., under Pleading, together with Lawton Pressed Brick & Tile Co. v. Ross-Kellar Triple Pressure Brick Mach. … . & Pr., appearing in Bracken v. Stone, 20 Okl. 613 , 95 P. 236, 237, 238 .

Bland v. Peters

30 Okla. 798 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 1911

.; 35 Cyc. 289; O’Donnell v. Wing, 121 Ga. 717 , 49 S. E. 720 ; State v. Betz, 207 Mo. 589 , 106 S. W. 64 ; Hall et al. v. Brown, 82 Tex. 469 , 17 S. W. 715 . … Co. v.

Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. Asher

64 O.B.A.J. 3286 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1993

As to assessment of attorney fees, engineering fees, appraisal fees, and litigation expenses in condemnation actions involving the OTA, the recent decision in Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. … In determining whether fees are reasonable, the standard of review established in Abel v.

Adams Oil & Gas Co. v. Hudson

55 Okla. 386 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1915

Kruse, supra; Devlin on Deeds, supra; Boone et al. v. Chiles et al., supra; Perkins v. Gregory et al., 87 Kan. 303 , 124 Pac. 168 ; Coon v. Browning, 10 Kan. 85 ; King v. … App. 258 , 133 Pac. 1153 ; Carr v. Mouzon, 93 S. C. 161, 76 S. E. 201 , Ann. Cas. 1914C, 731; Lakin v. Sierra-Butte Gold Mining Co., 25 Fed. 337 ; Tinnin v. Brown, 98 Miss. 378 , 53 South. 780 , Ann.

Saxon v. MacY

61 O.B.A.J. 1853 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 10, 1990

In Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. … In Rogers v. Excise Board of Greer County, supra, we held that even a violation of the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act was not sufficient to apply the public-interest exception to the mootness doctrine.

Oklahoma City v. Vahlberg, Co. Treas

197 Okla. 613 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1946

Schmidt, the owner of street improvement bonds, against the board of county commissioners of Oklahoma county and W. F. … Dickinson v. Tidd, supra; Prince v. Ypsilanti Sav. Bk., supra; McGrath v. Oklahoma City, 156 Okla. 34 , 9 P. 2d 711 .

Clark v. Lockstone

170 Okla. 316 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1934

Dean v. City of New Cordell, 151 Okla. 149 , 3 P. (2d) 160 . … Fest v. Gilbert, 102 Okla. 245 , 229 P. 275 , and Samuels v. Granite Sav. Bank & Trust Co. et al., 150 Okla. 174 , 1 P. (2d) 145 .

Dow Jones & Co. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission

787 P.2d 843 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1990

Kresge Co. v. Bowers, 170 Ohio St. 405 , 166 N.E.2d 139 , 141 [1960]; State ex rel. Park Invest. Co. v. Board of Tax Appeals, 32 Ohio St.2d 28 , 289 N.E.2d 579, 581 [1972]; Valent v. … New Jersey State Board of Education, 114 N.J.Super. 63 , 274 A.2d 832, 836 [1971]; Clark v. Board of Education of Little Rock Sch. Dist., 374 F.2d 569, 570-571 [8th Cir.1967], 10 .

Irion v. Nelson

207 Okla. 243 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1952

Thomas v. Morgan, 113 Okla. 212 , 240 P. 735 , 43 A.L.R. 934 ; City of Hollis v. Gould, 190 Okla. 335 , 123 P. 2d 241 ; Friend v. Holcombe, supra; Board of County Commissioners of Jackson County v. Owen, supra. … Board of County Commissioners of Jackson County v. Owen, supra. The case of Seaman v. Chestnut, 180 Okla. 582 , 71 P. 2d 965 , relied upon by plaintiff, is not determinative here.

Neverman and Plahn v. Bank of Cass County

14 Okla. 417 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 3, 1904

. *421 The statute above quoted is identical with the Statutes of California, sec. 1698 of the civil code of that state; and in Evensberd v. … The case of Allen v. Furbush, 4 Gray 504 , is to the same effect. Also Earsan v. Brown, 64 Kan. 466 , and Thistler v.

Matter of Estate of Katschor

543 P.2d 560 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1975

Co. v. Wayman, 169 Okl. 534 , 37 P.2d 976, 978 , 97 A.L.R. 854 (1934). Brown v. Chaddick, 197 Okl. 515 , 172 P.2d 996 (1946). … Co. v. Williams, 129 Ky. 515 , 112 S.W. 651 (1908); 17 Am.Jur.2d Continuance § 10 p. 128. In State v.

Price Miller v. Ratcliffe

47 Okla. 370 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1915

National Surety Co. v. Oklahoma Presbyterian College for Girls, 38 Okla. 429 , 132 Pac. 652 . … In the case of Boynton et al. v.

Bennett v. Hall

431 P.2d 339 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 23, 1967

See Acme Cab Co. v. Brown, 195 Okl. 164 , 156 P.2d 367 ; Jay Nuckolls Truck Line, Inc. v. Stephens, Admx., Okl., 380 P.2d 248 . … Hansen v. Cunningham, supra; Bishop’s Restaurant, Inc., of Tulsa, v. Whomble, Okl., 355 P.2d 560 . More recently, in Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v.

Application of Tubbs

620 P.2d 384 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1980

Board of Education of City of N.Y., 114 N.Y.S.2d 693 [1952], 13 . Application of Shipley, 26 Misc.2d 204 , 205 N.Y.S.2d 581 [1960]; Schoenberg v. … Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 571 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2706 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 [1972]; Stanley v. Illinois, supra note 25; Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 , 92 S.Ct. 1526 , 32 L.Ed.2d 15 [1972]; Cleveland Board of Education v.

Sand Springs Ry. Co. v. Baldridge

60 Okla. 102 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1916

Co. v. Northern P. Ry. Co., 31 Mont. 502 , 78 Pac. 1036 ; New Haven, etc., Co. v. Quintard, 6 Abb. Prac. N. S. (N. Y.) 128. … Bank v. Walworth, 22 Okla. 878 , 98 Pac. 917 ; Ft. Smith & W. R. Co. v. Collins, 26 Okla. 82 , 108 Pac. 550 ; Finch v. Brown, 27 Okla. 217 , 111 Pac. 391 ; Redus v. Mattison, 30 Okla. 720 , 121 Pac. 253 ; Chambers v.

Lucky-Kidd Mining Co. v. State Industrial Commission

110 Okla. 27 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1925

E. 791 : Dorrance v. New England Pin Co., 1 Conn. Comp. Dec. 24; McDonald v. Dunn, 2 Cal. I. A. C. Dec. 71; State ex rel. v. District Court (Minn.) 151 N. … The cases of Willis v. State Industrial Commission, 78 Okla. 216 , 190 Pac. 92 : Stasmos v. State Industrial Commission, 80 Okla. 221 , 195 Pac. 702 , and Associated Employers’ Reciprocal et al. v.