Case law

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Matukas

47 Okla. 302 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1915

The car was going in the same direction the boy was traveling, and he boarded it without any intention of paying his fare. … Railroad Co. v. Smith, 98 Ind. 42 ; O’Brien v. Loomis, 43 Mo. App. 29 . In the case of O’Brien v.

Ford v. Nellie B. Mining Co.

208 Okla. 265 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 17, 1953

Ross v. Ross, 184 Okla. 626 , 89 P. 2d 338 ; C. K. Howard & Co. v. McKay, 189 Okla. 453 , 117 P. 2d 525 . … Mudge Oil Co. v. Wagnon, 193 Okla. 466 , 145 P. 2d 185 . In E. I. du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc., v.

Woodruff v. Firestone

182 Okla. 606 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1938

In Sewell v. … Brown, 122 Okla. 40 , 252 P. 27 , and Jackson v. Haney, 166 Okla. 13 , 25 P.2d, 771 . Therefore, let the writ issue. RILEY, PHELPS, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ.. concur.

Spurr, Ex'x v. Pryor Stokes

104 Okla. 68 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 1924

Brown v. McDonald, 129 Mass. 66 . … Barrett v. Towne, supra.

Elson v. Walker

80 Okla. 237 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1921

Bank of Tuttle v. Gordon, 63 Okla. 47 , 161 Pac. 1081 ; Anderson v. Tatro, 44 Okla. 219 , 144 Pac. 360 ; Brown v. Marion National Bank, 169 U. S. 416 , 42 L. Ed. 80 . … Fitzpatrick v. Apperson, 79 Ky. 272 ; Kendall v. Crouch (Ky.) 11 S. W. 587 ; Robbins v. Muldrow, 39 Kan. 112 , 18 Pac. 64 . The plaintiffs evidently did not consider the note to Mrs.

Stillwater Milling Co. v. Mott

200 Okla. 562 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1948

Brown, 150 Okla. 299 , 1 P. 2d 783 ; and Armour & Co. v. … In Terminal Oil Mill Co. v.

Sabin v. Levorsen

184 Okla. 305 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1939

Cherry v. Brown, 79 Okla. 215 , 192 P. 227 , 13 A. L. R. 92. However, this does not shift the responsibility of procuring necessary extensions of time in which to make and serve such case-made. … In this connection, see, also, Smoot v. Mullins, 181 Okla. 505 , 75 P.2d 179 ; Hargrave v. Greer, 182 Okla. 608 , 79 P.2d 221 ; City of Ada v. Chambless, 183 Okla. 58 , 79 P.2d 1018 ; Bankard v.

Ex Parte Meek

165 Okla. 80 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1933

The original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court shall extend to a general superintending control over all inferior courts and all commissions and boards created by law. * * *” Beginning with the early case of Burks v. … Ikard v.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Houts

420 P.2d 498 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1966

In support of his Proposition No. 1, that disbarment is not compulsory, Respondent invites our attention to Baker v. … At the time the instant case was being considered by the Executive Council (now Board of Governors) there was no provision for a hearing or authority to recommend, other than disbarment. *501 Since this case is controlled

M. S. Cohn Gravel Co. v. Southern Surety Co.

129 Okla. 171 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1927

or department thereof including the board of education.” … It was there held that the added words “against the' city or any board or department thereof including the board of education,” clearly limit and qualify the effect of the word “void,” and further said: “Having specified

Grand River Dam Authority v. Thompson

189 Okla. 89 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1941

The case of Pippen v. Board of Com’rs of Okmulgee County, 87 Okla. 177 , 209 P. 292 , also involving the taking of land for public purposes, was also cited. … Co. v.

Mercer v. McKeel

177 Okla. 499 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1936

Showalter v. Hampton, 122 Okla. 192 , 253 P. 105 ; Board of County Com’rs, Kiowa County, v. Kiowa National Bank, 166 Okla. 255 , 27 P. (2d) 338 ; Williams v. … . & Loan Ass’n, 165 Okla. 244 , 25 P. (2d) 1086 ; Starr v. Woods, 162 Okla. 242 , 19 P. (2d) 561 . The appeal is therefore dismissed. McNEILL, C. J., OSBORN, V. C. J., and BAYLESS, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. 1

AOF/Shadybrook Affordable Housing Corp. v. Yazel

282 P.3d 775 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 2012

Austin, Nichols & Co. v. Okla. Cnty. Board of Tax-Roll Corrections, 1978 OK 65, ¶19 , 578 P.2d 1200, 1203-04 . … In Tulsa County v. St.

Pray v. Kidd Williams Drilling Corporation

352 P.2d 380 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1960

Brown & Brown, Oklahoma City, by Paul Brown, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error. Monnet, Monnet & Monnet, Tulsa, by Buford D. Monnet, Tulsa, for defendant in error. *381 JACKSON, Justice. … In Lee v.

L. C. Kimsey Heating & Plumbing Co. v. House

152 Okla. 200 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1931

Illinois Industrial Board held in the case of Kringle v. … Therefore, the Board was of the opinion that it was an accident within the Compensation Act; * * * that the injury arose out of and occurred in the course of the employment. * si Also, in the case of Patten Hotel Co. v.

King v. Berryhill Fire Protection District

311 P.3d 836 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 24, 2013

Burk v. K-Mart Corp., 1989 OK 22, ¶ 17 , 770 P.2d 24, 28 (footnote omitted). … Vasek v. Board of County Commissioners of Noble County, 2008 OK 35, ¶ 22 , 186 P.8d 928, 933 (citation omitted). T5 In the case at hand, the jury believed Mr.

State v. Dixon

67 O.B.A.J. 528 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1996

Pam Moyer, as an individual and as the next of friend of her three children, sued the McCurtain County Board of Commissioners and the Oklahoma Department of Transportation in the district court in McCurtain County to recover … Cruse v.

Quick v. City of Fairview

144 Okla. 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1930

In Christy v. … This question was settled in the case of Readdy v.

Armstrong v. State Ex Rel. Fain

29 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1911

Other cases to the same effect are: Chessire v. People, 116 Ill. 493 , 6 N. E. 486 ; People v. Draper, 15 N. Y. 532; People v. Carpenter, 24 N. Y. 86; People v. Board of Education, 101 Ill. 308 , 40 Am. … A. 220; Board of Commissioners v. Perkins, 5 Wyo. 166, 38 Pac. 915 . All of these seem to sustain the judgment of the court below.

Bixby v. Cravens

57 Okla. 119 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1916

The law of this case is well stated by the Supreme Court of Indiana in the case of Giller v. West, 162 Ind. 17 , at page 20, 69 N. … The Supreme Court of Arkansas, in the case of Gus Blass Dry Goods Co. v. Reinman & Wolfort, 102 Ark. 287 , 143 S.