Case law

Grand River Dam Authority v. Thompson

189 Okla. 89 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1941

The case of Pippen v. Board of Com’rs of Okmulgee County, 87 Okla. 177 , 209 P. 292 , also involving the taking of land for public purposes, was also cited. … Co. v.

Fife v. Cornelous

35 Okla. 402 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1912

Board of Commissioners of Garfield Co. v. Porter et al., 19 Okla. 173 , 92 Pac. 152 . … Co. v. Gish & Co., 23 Okla. 824 , 102 Pac. 708 . The appeal is dismissed. All the Justices concur.

AOF/Shadybrook Affordable Housing Corp. v. Yazel

282 P.3d 775 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 2012

Austin, Nichols & Co. v. Okla. Cnty. Board of Tax-Roll Corrections, 1978 OK 65, ¶19 , 578 P.2d 1200, 1203-04 . … In Tulsa County v. St.

Quick v. City of Fairview

144 Okla. 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1930

In Christy v. … This question was settled in the case of Readdy v.

Love v. Silverthorn

187 Okla. 114 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 27, 1940

Corp., Limited, et al. v. … In the case of State Tax Commission et al. v.

Woodruff v. Firestone

182 Okla. 606 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1938

In Sewell v. … Brown, 122 Okla. 40 , 252 P. 27 , and Jackson v. Haney, 166 Okla. 13 , 25 P.2d, 771 . Therefore, let the writ issue. RILEY, PHELPS, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ.. concur.

Ford v. Nellie B. Mining Co.

208 Okla. 265 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 17, 1953

Ross v. Ross, 184 Okla. 626 , 89 P. 2d 338 ; C. K. Howard & Co. v. McKay, 189 Okla. 453 , 117 P. 2d 525 . … Mudge Oil Co. v. Wagnon, 193 Okla. 466 , 145 P. 2d 185 . In E. I. du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc., v.

Baker v. Marcus

204 Okla. 224 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 1951

The only case cited by defendant is Wrenn v. Sutton, 65 C. A. 2d 823, 150 P. 2d 589 . This case is not in point and the question involved therein is not involved in this proceeding. … Smith v. Aronoff, 179 Okla. 560 , 67 P. 2d 447 ; Smith v. Graham Brown Shoe Co., 179 Okla. 559 , 67 P. 2d 448 ; Barker v. Chase, 128 Okla. 38 , 260 P. 1063 . Appeal dismissed.

Marvel v. White

5 Okla. 736 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1897

(Brown v. Rhodes, 1 Kan. 359 ). … (Orr v. Pennington, [Va.], 24 S. E. 928 ).

Fisk v. Ellis

133 Okla. 43 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1928

In the case of James v. O’Driscoll (S. C.) 1 Am. … Louis, Mo., v. First State Bank of Oilton, 110 Okla. 299 , 237 Pac. 578 ; Klein v. Muhlhausen, 83 Okla. 21 , 200 Pac. 436 .

Griggs v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Department of Transportation

702 P.2d 1017 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1985

In Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Guaranty Loan & Invest. … In McGaha v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, Okl., 691 P.2d 895 [1984] and Williams v.

Mercer v. McKeel

177 Okla. 499 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1936

Showalter v. Hampton, 122 Okla. 192 , 253 P. 105 ; Board of County Com’rs, Kiowa County, v. Kiowa National Bank, 166 Okla. 255 , 27 P. (2d) 338 ; Williams v. … . & Loan Ass’n, 165 Okla. 244 , 25 P. (2d) 1086 ; Starr v. Woods, 162 Okla. 242 , 19 P. (2d) 561 . The appeal is therefore dismissed. McNEILL, C. J., OSBORN, V. C. J., and BAYLESS, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. 1

Bixby v. Cravens

57 Okla. 119 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1916

The law of this case is well stated by the Supreme Court of Indiana in the case of Giller v. West, 162 Ind. 17 , at page 20, 69 N. … The Supreme Court of Arkansas, in the case of Gus Blass Dry Goods Co. v. Reinman & Wolfort, 102 Ark. 287 , 143 S.

Sherman v. Randolph

13 Okla. 224 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1903

of Commissioners of Washita County v. … Hubble, 8 Okla. 169 ; Board of Commissioners of D County v. Wright, 8 Okla. 190 .)

Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. Dolese Bros. Co.

163 Okla. 36 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1933

See Glazier v. Heneybuss, 19 Okla. 316 , 91 P. 872 ; Chouteau v, Hoss, 118 Okla. 76 , 246 P. 844 ; Zahn v. Obert, 60 Okla. 118 , 159 P. 298 ; Chicago Bridge & Iron Works v. … In Coyle v. U. S.

Farmers' Nat. Bank v. Johnston

71 Okla. 172 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 19, 1918

Butterworth, 106 Mass. 75 ; Farmers’ & Drovers’ Bank v. Williamson, 61 Mo. 261 ; Yakima National Bank v. Knipe et al., 6 Wash. 348 . 33 Pac. 834 : Pacific Drug Co. v. … Hamilton, 71 Wash. 469 . 128 Pac. 1069 ; Goldberg Brown & Co. v. Dimick et al., 169 Cal. 187 , 146 Pac. 672 .

Smith v. Hall

418 P.2d 665 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1966

Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Wilhoit, Okl., 270 P.2d 645 . See also Schneider v. Athey, 113 Okl. 94 , 239 P. 242 . … In the case of Wylie-Stewart Machinery Co. v.

Oklahoma County Utility Services Authority v. Corporation Commission

478 P.2d 352 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1970

Board of County Commissioners v. Warram, Okl., 285 P.2d 1034 ; Warram v. Board of County Commissioners, Okl., 358 P.2d 222 . The Legislature is authorized to expand the jurisdiction of the Corporation Commission.

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Cruce

129 Okla. 60 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 17, 1928

. *61 217 Pac. 377 ; Little Fay Oil Co. v. Killian, 90 Okla. 267 , 217 Pac. 379 . Actual notice supplies the defect. Parker-Washington Co. v. Industrial Board (Ill.) 113 N. E. 976 ; Wabash Ry. Co. v. … In the case of Dame v.

City of Madill v. Dabney

142 Okla. 92 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1930

The Attorney General relies upon the language of this court in the case of Board of Education of the City of Oilton v. … Eaton v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co., supra, and cases cited therein. As was pointed out in State ex rel. Board of Education v.