Case law

Sand Springs R. Co. v. Smith

84 Okla. 211 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1921

Co. v. Duran, 38 Okla. 719 , 134 Pac. 867 ; Osage Coal & Mining Co. v. Sperra, 42 Okla. 726 , 142 Pac. 1040 ; St. L. & S. F. R. Co. v. Long, 41 Okla. 177 , 137 Pac. 1156 ; St. L. & S. F. R. Co. v. … Bunker v. Harding et al., 70 Oklahoma, 174 Pac. 749 : Blasdel et al. v. Gower, 70 Oklahoma, 173 Pac. 644 ; Shawnee National Bank v. Pool, 66 Okla. 145 , 167 Pac. 994 : Chicago, R. I, & P. Ry. Co. v.

Brooks v. State

152 Okla. 119 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1931

Short v. … In Oklahoma City Land & Development Co. v.

Minshall v. Berryhill

83 Okla. 100 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1921

Brady v. Sizemore et al., 33 Okla. 169 , 124 Pac. 615 ; McKee v. Henry, 201 Fed. 74 ; Woodbury v. U. S., 170 Fed. 302 ; Bruner, v. Nordmeyer, 64 Okla. 163 , 166 Pac. 126 ; Hamilton v. … Jefferson v. Fink, 247 U. S. 288 , 62 L. Ed. 1117 ; Pigeon v.

M. S. Cohn Gravel Co. v. Southern Surety Co.

129 Okla. 171 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1927

or department thereof including the board of education.” … It was there held that the added words “against the' city or any board or department thereof including the board of education,” clearly limit and qualify the effect of the word “void,” and further said: “Having specified

Bachman v. Thompson

22 Okla. 621 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1908

Harman v. Burt, 20 Okla. 509 , 94 Pac. 528 ; Parker et al. v. Territory ex rel, Bostic, 20 Okla. 851 , 94 Pac. 175 ; Freeman v. Board of Medical Examiners, 20 Okla. 610 , 95 Pac. 229 ; Braun v.

Homestead Fire Ins. Co. v. De Witt

206 Okla. 570 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1952

They cite National Fire Insurance Co. v. Kenny, 224 Ala. 586 , 141 So. 350 , Cardinal v. Mecury Insurance Co., 273 N. Y. S. 487, 195 N. … They also call attention to Mixon v. St. P., F. & M.

Armstrong v. State Ex Rel. Fain

29 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1911

Other cases to the same effect are: Chessire v. People, 116 Ill. 493 , 6 N. E. 486 ; People v. Draper, 15 N. Y. 532; People v. Carpenter, 24 N. Y. 86; People v. Board of Education, 101 Ill. 308 , 40 Am. … A. 220; Board of Commissioners v. Perkins, 5 Wyo. 166, 38 Pac. 915 . All of these seem to sustain the judgment of the court below.

Associated Employers' Reciprocal v. State Industrial Commission

87 Okla. 16 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 18, 1922

the authority of the board with reference to approval of physician’s fee beyond that provided in section 25, in case of an emergency caused by the employer’s failure to provide medical care, and the board has no jurisdiction … Semmen v. Butterick Publishing Co., 166 N. Y. Supp. 993 ; Feldstein v. Buick Motor Co., 187 N. Y. Supp. 417 .

Walker v. Womack

181 Okla. 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1937

State Board of Medical Examin *35 ers, 122 Okla. 66 , 251 P. 31 ), lie is entitled to the same in the instant case. … Parmenter v. Ray, 58 Okla. 27 , 158 P. 1183 .

Spartan Aircraft Company v. Stockton

279 P.2d 333 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 25, 1955

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. State Industrial Commission, 185 Okl. 72 , 90 P.2d 398 ; Derr v. Weaver, 177 Okl. 100 , 57 P.2d 1153 . As stated in Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. … Petitioner cites Southern Drilling Co. v. Daley, 166 Okl. 33 , 25 P.2d 1082 , and Brown Bros. v. Parks, 176 Okl. 615 , 56 P.2d 883 .

Yates v. Jones

92 Okla. 64 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1923

Following the doctrine laid down in United States v. Noble, 237 U. S. 74 , 35 Sup. Ct. 532, 59 L. Ed. 844 , and Hudson v. … See, also, Mullen et al. v. Carter, *65 68 Okla. 207 , 178 Pac. 512 ; Brown v. Van Pelt, 64 Okla. 109 , 166 Pac. 102 .

Drake v. High

69 Okla. 288 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1918

Anderson v. Kelley, 57 Okla. 109 , 156 Pac. 1167 ; Harris-Lipsitz Co. v. Oldham, 56 Okla. 124 , 155 Pac. 865 ; Williamson-Halsell-Frazier Co. v. Ackerman, 77 Kan. 502 , 94 Pac. 807 , 20 L. R. A. (N. S.) 484. … Brown v. Brown, 62 Kan. 666 , 64 Pac. 599 ; Trubody v. Trubody, 137 Cal. 172 , 69 Pac. 968 ; 14 Cyc. 147. Therefore the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed: By the Court: It is so ordered.

Baker v. Marcus

204 Okla. 224 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 1951

The only case cited by defendant is Wrenn v. Sutton, 65 C. A. 2d 823, 150 P. 2d 589 . This case is not in point and the question involved therein is not involved in this proceeding. … Smith v. Aronoff, 179 Okla. 560 , 67 P. 2d 447 ; Smith v. Graham Brown Shoe Co., 179 Okla. 559 , 67 P. 2d 448 ; Barker v. Chase, 128 Okla. 38 , 260 P. 1063 . Appeal dismissed.

Lindsay State Bank v. McGren

96 Okla. 74 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1923

indebted to the defendant and agreed to execute to the defendant a deed to certain lands belonging to the plaintiffs, and that as a part of the consideration it was agreed that the defendant would pay to the Stephenson-Browne … In Tayiah v.

King v. Berryhill Fire Protection District

311 P.3d 836 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 24, 2013

Burk v. K-Mart Corp., 1989 OK 22, ¶ 17 , 770 P.2d 24, 28 (footnote omitted). … Vasek v. Board of County Commissioners of Noble County, 2008 OK 35, ¶ 22 , 186 P.8d 928, 933 (citation omitted). T5 In the case at hand, the jury believed Mr.

Spradling v. Hudson, District Judge

45 Okla. 767 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1915

Morrison v. Brown, Judge, 26 Okla. 201 , 109 Pac. 237 ; Herndon v. Hammond, County Judge, 28 Okla. 616 , 115 Pac. 775 ; Ex parte Oklahoma, 220 U. S. 191 , 31 Sup, Ct. 426, 55 L. Ed. 431 ; State v. … State ex rel. v.

Citizens' State Bank of Ft. Gibson v. Strahan

63 Okla. 288 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1917

. & Pr. 581; White v. Portland, 67 Conn. 277 , 34 Atl. 1022 ; Nelson v. Smith, 54 Ill. App. 346 ; Mattoon v. Fallin, 113 Ill. 249 ; Cofran v. Shepard, 148 Mass. 582 , 20 N. E. 281 . Cruchon v. Brown, 57 Mo. 38 . … Ordway v. Central Nat. Bank, 47 Md. 217 , 28 Am. Rep. 455 ; Farmers’ Nat. Bank v. Dearing, 91 U. S. 29 . 23 L. Ed. 196 ; Eaker v. Bryant, 24 Cal. 87 , 140 Pac. 310 ; Citizens’ Bank v. Donnell, 172 Mo. 384 , 72 S.

Western Roofing Tile Co. v. Jones

26 Okla. 209 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1910

Ency. of Law, p. 140; Hammon on Contracts, p. 85; Wald’s Pollock on Contracts (3d Ed.) p. 46; Thomas v. Dering, 1 Keen, 729, 48 English Reports (Reprint) 488; Mississippi & Dominion Steamship Co. v. … Rep. 545 ; Allen et al. v. Chouteau, 102 Mo. 309 , 14 S. W. 869 ; Blaney et al. v. Hoke, 14 Ohio St. 292 ; Montague et al. v. Weill & Bro., 30 La. Ann. 50 ; Hodges v. Sublett, 91 Ala., 588 , 8 South. 800 ; Wharton v.

Bellmon v. Albert

648 P.2d 1207 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1982

State Election Board of Oklahoma, 318 P.2d 422, 425 (Okl.1957). See also Williamson v. Carter, 177 Okl. 382 , *1219 59 P.2d 948 (1936) and Simpson v. Hill, 128 Okl. 269 , 263 P. 635, 637 , 56 A.L.R. 706 (1927). … Musick v. State ex rel. Miles, 185 Okl. 140 , 90 P.2d 631 (1939); Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma County, 185 Okl. 342 , 91 P.2d 771 (1939) and Champlin Refining Co. v.

Harris v. Burgess

188 Okla. 338 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1941

Russell v. Russell, 14 Ky. L. Rep. 236; Patterson v. Browning, 146 Ind. 160 , 44 N. E. 993 . See the comment on those cases in L. R. A. 1918A, 824, 825. In the case of In re Sutton’s Estate, 161 Minn. 426 , 201 N. … The court stated, however, that it was a parallel case to Patterson v. Brown, supra, and based its holding mainly on that case.