Case law

Kay County, Excise Board v. Kurn

185 Okla. 330 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1939

WELCH, V. C. J. This appeal involves protest of the same item of appropriation, on the same ground, as that iuvovled in cause No. 29057, Kay County, Excise Board, v. Atchison. T. & S. F. Ry.

Hadlock v. Board of County Commissioners

5 Okla. 570 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1897

Pleading and Practice, vol. 2, 60; Houk v. Barthold, 73 Ind. 21 ). … . *574 And even if it be held that the judgment of the board of commissioners is a void judgment, still appeal will lie. (Shoemaker v. Grant Co. 36 Ind. 165 ; Stoning v. States, 31 Conn. 213 ; Petty v.

Gulf, Colorado & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Brown

112 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 15, 1925

Colonna v. Eiseman Mfg. Co., 98 Okla. 107 , 224 Pac. 181 ; Mills v. Williams, 87 Okla. 190 , 209 Pac. 771 ; Mills v. Stewart, 87 Okla. 189 , 209 Pac. 770 ; Muskogee Elec. Trac. Co. v. … Jackson, 88 Okla. 184 , 212 ■ Pac. 416; Clapp v. Miller, 89 Okla. 38 , 213 Pac. 854 ; Producers & Refiners Oorp. v. Castile, 89 Okla. 261 , 214 Pac. 121 .

Board of County Commissioners v. Lloyd

322 P.2d 406 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1958

King v. McCurdy, 171 Okl. 445 , 43 P.2d 124 ; Seaman v. Chesnut, 180 Okl. 582 , 71 P.2d 965 ; City of Hollis v. … Board of County Commissioners of Jackson Co. v. Owen, 196 Okl. 538 , 166 P.2d 766 .

Vaughn v. Board of Bar Examiners

759 P.2d 1026 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 19, 1988

Board of Education of City of Los Angeles v. Swan, 41 Cal.2d 546, 552 , 261 P.2d 261, 265 (1953) (citing Voorhees, The Law of Public Schools, sec. 62, p. 136). … Board of Trustees v. Stubblefield, 16 Cal.App.3d 820 , 94 Cal.Rptr. 318 (1971); Weissman v. Board of Education, 190 Colo. 414 , 547 P.2d 1267 (1976); Denton v.

State Ex Rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Brown

519 P.2d 491 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 19, 1974

Ramsey v. Fowler (1957), Okl., 308 P.2d 654 , cited in Steiger v. Commerce Acceptance Corp. (1969), Okl., 455 P.2d 81, 86 . … In Landry v.

Oklahoma Inspection Bureau v. Insurance Board

281 P.2d 941 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1955

Within the time prescribed in statute that the Board shall review such a filing, the Board entered an order disapproving the said filing. … J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and CORN, DAVISON, HALLEY, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.

Board of Com'rs, Cleveland Co. v. Barr

68 Okla. 193 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1918

Brown, was under authority of law, and that the same was ratified by the board of county commissioners of Cleveland county.” … It is contended, on the authority of Dolezal v. Bostick, 41 Okla. 743 , 139 Pac. 964 , Board of County Commissioners v. Seawell, 3 Okla. 281 , 41 Pac. 592 , and Nolan v.

Comstock Smedley v. Brown

115 Okla. 81 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1925

Brown commenced her action in the district court of Tulsa county, against Comstock & Smedley for damages. … Young v. Eaton, 82 Okla. 166 , 198 Pac. 857 . It is recommended that the judgment of the court be affirmed. By the Court: It is so ordered. Note. — See under (1) 4 O. .1. p. 854 §2834; 2 R. C. L. p. 194; 1 R. O. L.

Lowden v. Stephens County Excise Board

191 Okla. 5 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1942

Roth v. Union Nat. Bank, 58 Okla. 604 , 160 P. 505 . … See Sinclair Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County Excise Board, 173 Okla. 375 , 49 P. 2d 114 ; In re Gypsy Oil Co., 141 Okla. 291 , 285 P. 67 , and other cases of similar effect and conclusion.

Hodges v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board

580 P.2d 980 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1978

In the recent case of Lowery v. Hodges, 555 P.2d 1016 (Okl.1976), we considered an almost identical case to this one. … The judgment of the Trial Court is reversed and the findings of the Water Resources Board granting a temporary permit to Appellants is reinstated. LAVENDER, V. C. J., and WILLIAMS, IRWIN, BERRY and DOOLIN, JJ., concur.

Robberson v. Board of County Commissioners

302 P.2d 784 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1956

Ip this connection, see Sesnovich v. Board of Appeals, 313 Mass. 393 , 47 N.E.2d 943, 945 ; McQuillim Municipal Corporations, 3d Ed., Vol. 8, seq. 25.269; 58 Am.Jur., “Zoning”, • sec. 219. … See Borough of Oakland v. Board of Conservation, etc., 98 N.J.L. 806 , 122 A. 311 , 126 A. 534 .

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Moss

509 P.2d 666 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 1973

Co. v. Ferguson Inv. Co., 388 P.2d *668 300 (Okl.1963); Application of State Board of Medical Examiners (In re Nathan), 201 Okl. 365 , 206 P.2d 211 (1949). In the case of Boydston v. … Wray v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 442 P.2d 309, 312 (Okl.1968).

Sasseen v. State Board of Equalization

363 P.2d 252 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1961

Here, plaintiff in error, referred to as appellant, appeals from the same order of the State Board of Equalization appealed from in Causes Numbered 39321, 39323, Board of County Commissioners v. … The appellee board’s position is that such statutes, as the cited one, are directory (as distinguished from mandatory), and that, under an excerpt it quotes from our opinion in Greer County Excise Board v.

Kline v. Board of County Com'rs

268 P.2d 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1954

The plaintiff, Solomon Kline, was ■ the owner of 160 acres, of land in Blaine County and in 1948 he filed this action against the Board of County Commissioners of Blaine County and alleged .that they had damaged his land … J.OHÑSON, V. C. J., and CORN, DAV-ISÓN, O’NEAL and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur. WELCH and BLACKBIRD, JJ., dissent.

Board of Education of Duncan v. Johnston

189 Okla. 172 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1941

Johnston, owner of paving bonds, secured below a writ of mandamus to compel the board of education of the city of Duncan to include in its estimate for the fiscal years 1937, 1938, and 1939 tax levies to pay delinquent installments … Reaves v. Turner, 20 Okla. 492 , 94 P. 543 ; Tiger v. Brown et al., 130 Okla. 83 , 165 P. 124 ; Fox v. Ziehme et al., 30 Okla. 673 , 120 P. 285 ; Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Wilcox, 32 Okla. 51 , 121 P. 656 ; Ostran v.

Hess v. Excise Board of McCurtain County

698 P.2d 930 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1985

Letteer v. Conservancy District No. 30, Okl., 385 P.2d 796, 800 [1963], . 68 O.S.1981 § 2487; Summey v. Tisdale, Okl., 658 P.2d 464, 468-469 [1982]; Excise Board of Greer County v. … Rogers, Okl., — P.2d-[56 O.B.J. 37, Sup.Ct.No. 59,259, December 26, 1984], .Summey v. Tisdale, supra note 10 at 469; Excise Board of Greer County v. Rogers, supra note 10. The trial court’s reliance on Neel v.

Hargrave v. Tulsa Board of Adjustment

73 O.B.A.J. 2598 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 24, 2002

Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶ 22, n. 30 , 989 P.2d 448, 456, n. 30 . … Oklahoma Employment Security Commission v.

Hughes v. Oklahoma State Election Board

413 P.2d 543 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1966

In Briggs v. … In State v.

Board of Comrs. Day Co. v. Hubble

8 Okla. 209 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

(Abel v. Blair, 3 Okla. 399 , 41 Pac. 342 ; Polson v. Purcell, 4 Okla. 93 , 46 Pac. 578 ; Sigman v. Poole, 5 Okla. 677 , 49 Pac. 944 .) … (Brown v. Johnson, 14 Kan. 377 .) In Gimbel v.