Case law

Furrow & Co. v. Miller

188 Okla. 199 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1940

Rose Hill Burial Park v. Garrison, 176 Okla. 355 , 55 P. 2d 1045 ; Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v. Mathews, 162 Okla. 283 , 20 P. 2d 141 ; Veazey Drug Co. v. … While in Hein v.

Fort v. Oklahoma Industries, Inc.

385 P.2d 470 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1963

See Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. Warram, Okl., 285 P.2d 1034 ; Morris v. City of Okla. City et al., Okl., 299 P.2d 131 ; and Meder v. City of Oklahoma City et al., supra. … In the case of Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v.

Associated Employers' Reciprocal v. State Industrial Commission

87 Okla. 16 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 18, 1922

the authority of the board with reference to approval of physician’s fee beyond that provided in section 25, in case of an emergency caused by the employer’s failure to provide medical care, and the board has no jurisdiction … Semmen v. Butterick Publishing Co., 166 N. Y. Supp. 993 ; Feldstein v. Buick Motor Co., 187 N. Y. Supp. 417 .

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF DOWNING

489 P.3d 9 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 2021

Brown ex rel. Brown v. Okla. Secondary Sch. Activities Ass'n , 2005 OK 88, ¶ 11 , 125 P.3d 1219, 1225 (footnotes omitted). Entitlement to injunctive relief must be established by clear and convincing evidence. … ASS'N Discussed 2016 OK 112 , 384 P.3d 496 , BROWN v. ALLEY Discussed 2018 OK 21 , 415 P.3d 43 , BENEDETTI v. CIMAREX ENERGY COMPANY Discussed 2018 OK 91 , 434 P.3d 941 , CHRISTIAN v.

Walden v. Potts

97 Okla. 24 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 1924

Maudie Keenan, and Aggie Brown were daughters of Francis M. Potts, deceased: and that defendants Clarence M. Potts, Ernest Potts, Minnie M. Miller, Dora M. … '■ *27 In Shaffer v.

Horstman v. Bowermaster

90 Okla. 262 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 17, 1923

The case of Mathews v. … Brown v. Massey, 19 Okla. 482 , 92 Pac. 246 . The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. JOHNSON, C. J., and McNEILL, KEN-NAMER, I-IARRISON, and BRANSON, JJ., concur. r

Hair v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission

740 P.2d 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1987

In Cravens v. … Brown, 641 P.2d at 1110 n. 2 (citing Anderson-Prichard Oil Corp., supra).

Yates v. Jones

92 Okla. 64 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1923

Following the doctrine laid down in United States v. Noble, 237 U. S. 74 , 35 Sup. Ct. 532, 59 L. Ed. 844 , and Hudson v. … See, also, Mullen et al. v. Carter, *65 68 Okla. 207 , 178 Pac. 512 ; Brown v. Van Pelt, 64 Okla. 109 , 166 Pac. 102 .

McDonald's Corp. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

563 P.2d 635 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 26, 1977

Appellant relies heavily on KFC of Ohio, Inc., d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken v. Kosydar, Ohio Board of Tax Appeals, No. A-408, October 1, 1973, Ohio Tax Reports, P. 11, 313 § 200-682. … In Roberts v.

State v. Davis

57 Okla. 490 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1916

(Hughes v. Board of Com’rs, Okla. County, 50 Okla. 410 , 150 Pac. 1029 ; Board of Co. Com’rs of Creek County v. Vaughn, 51 Okla. 609 , 152 Pac. 115 .) In Jordan et al. v. … In Dysart v.

Minshall v. Berryhill

83 Okla. 100 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1921

Brady v. Sizemore et al., 33 Okla. 169 , 124 Pac. 615 ; McKee v. Henry, 201 Fed. 74 ; Woodbury v. U. S., 170 Fed. 302 ; Bruner, v. Nordmeyer, 64 Okla. 163 , 166 Pac. 126 ; Hamilton v. … Jefferson v. Fink, 247 U. S. 288 , 62 L. Ed. 1117 ; Pigeon v.

St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Clark

17 Okla. 562 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 7, 1906

To the same effect are Betts v. Eubanks, (Kan.) 23 Pac. 936 ; Dickerson v. Burlington & Mo. R. Ry. Co. (Kan.) 23 Pac. 936 ; Harkness v. Hyde, 98 U. S. 476 ; So. Pac. Co. v. Dentoh 146 U. S. 302 ; Mex. Cent. Ry. Co. v. … Co. v. Gonzales, 151 U. S. 496 ; Secrest v. Arnett. (Ind.) 5 Black 366 ; Mullins v. N. & N. C. Canal Co. (N. C.) 19 S. E. 106 ; Kincaid v. Myers (Ore.) 21 Pac. 557 ; Woodbury v. Hermingsen, (Wash.) 39 Pac. 243 ; Ency.

Spradling v. Hudson, District Judge

45 Okla. 767 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1915

Morrison v. Brown, Judge, 26 Okla. 201 , 109 Pac. 237 ; Herndon v. Hammond, County Judge, 28 Okla. 616 , 115 Pac. 775 ; Ex parte Oklahoma, 220 U. S. 191 , 31 Sup, Ct. 426, 55 L. Ed. 431 ; State v. … State ex rel. v.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Matukas

47 Okla. 302 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1915

The car was going in the same direction the boy was traveling, and he boarded it without any intention of paying his fare. … Railroad Co. v. Smith, 98 Ind. 42 ; O’Brien v. Loomis, 43 Mo. App. 29 . In the case of O’Brien v.

Simpson v. Hicks

90 Okla. 207 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 3, 1923

of restricted lands by-Choctaws and Chickasaws for agricultural' purposes, and without going into the cases or discussing the reasons assigned, it is sufficient to say that we feel that the rule announced in the case of Brown … et al. v.

Shaffer Oil & Refining Co. v. County Treasurer

175 Okla. 6 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1935

Kenoyer v. Board of Equalization of Ottawa County, 130 Okla. 3 , 264 P. 891 ; Josey Oil Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 107 Okla. 266 , 231 P. 272 . … In the case of Going, County Treas., v. Shaffer, 89 Okla. 46 , 213 P. 736 , and the subsequent case of Board of Equalization of Carter County v.

Rural Water Sewer & Solid Waste Management, District No. 1, Logan County v. City of Guthrie

253 P.3d 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 2010

No. 1 v. City of Lawton, 1972 OK 117 , 501 P.2d 490 and Rural Water & Sewer Dist. No. 4 v. … Co. v. Caddo Elec.

Blackert v. Lankford

74 Okla. 61 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1918

See Hurlburt v. Arthur, 140 Cal. 103 , 73 Pac. 734 , 98 Am. St. Rep. 17 ; Magruder v. Colston, 44 Md. 357 , 22 Am. Rep. 47 : Pauly v. S. L. & T. Co., 165 U. S. 620 , 17 Sup. Ct. 465, 41 L. Ed. 844 ; Anderson v. Phil. … Ed. 478 ; Adams v. Clark, 36 Colo. 65 , 85 Pac. 642 , 10 Ann. Cas. 774; O’Connor v. Witherby, 111 Cal. 523 , 44 Pac. 227 ; Flynn v. A. B. & T. Co., 104 Me. 141 , 69 Atl. 771 , 19 L. R. A. (N. S.) 428, 129 Am. St.

State v. Bailey

305 P.2d 548 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 26, 1956

This court held, in the case of Board of Com’rs of Kingfisher County v. Shutler, 139 Okl. 52 , 281 P. 222 , and the earlier case of State v. … Allen v. Board of Education, 206 Okl. 699 , 246 P.2d 368 , and in numerous intervening cases. More recently, the case of Phillips v. H. A.

Osage Oil & Ref. Co. v. Dickason-Goodman Lbr. Co.

108 Okla. 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1924

Hughes, 1 Brown (Pa.) 258; Martin v. Kilbourne (Tenn.) 12 Heisk, 331: Thomas v. Cole (Tenn.) 10 Heisk, 411. … Gordon (La.) 12 Martin, 378; Field v. Zalle, 5 Mo. App. 596 ; Fisse v. Einstein, 5 Mo. App. 78 ; Murray v. Bass (N. C.) 114 S. E. 303 ; Farrell v. Finch, 40 Ohio St. 337 ; Knapp v. Anderson, 71 N.