Case law

Vandervort v. Keen

184 Okla. 121 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 22, 1938

Keen, district judge of Custer county, to arrest proceedings in an injunction suit brought in that court by the State Board of Barber Examiners against petitioners pursuant to article 2. chapter 24, S. … The aforesaid statute is attacked as unconstitutional upon the same grounds as urged in the case of Herrin v. Arnold, 183 Okla. 392 , 82 P.2d 977 .

Lyman v. Cowen

167 Okla. 574 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 27, 1934

Winans v. Hare, 46 Okla. 741 ; 148 P. 1052 ; Lee v. Little, 81 Okla. 168 , 197 P. 499 ; The Lane Implement Co. v. Lowder, 11 Okla. 61 , 65 P. 926 ; Rogers v. Brown, 15 Okla. 524 , 86 P. 443 . … We have held in Horton v. Early, 39 Okla. 99 , 134 P. 436 , Enterprise Seed Co. v. Moore, 51 Okla. 477 , 151 P. 867 , and Barker v.

Robertson v. Bozarth

87 Okla. 102 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1922

Cranny (Wash.) 71 Pac. 50 ; Seymore Water Co. v. Seymore, 163 Ind. 120 , 70 N. E. 514 ; State v. Gracey, 11 Nev. 223 ; Perez v. Barber, 70 N. Mex. 223 ; In re Epley et al., 10 Okla. 631 , 64 Pac. 18 ; People v. … E. 374 ; Marshall County Judge v. Sitton, 68 Oklahoma, 172 Pac. 964 ; Matney v. King, 20 Okla. 22 , 93 Pac. 737 .

Cales v. Gray

105 Okla. 54 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 1924

J. 140, sec. 28; Byrd v. Woods, 77 Okla. 236 , 188 Pac. 337 ; Smith v. Morton et al., 70 Okla. 157 , 173 Pac. 520 ; Mueller v. Woodson (Mo.) 198 S. W. 1134 ; Browne on the Statute of Frauds, section 197. … Mueller v. Woodson, supra. We are not unmindful that the beneficiary and the promisor may become jointly liable, but no such case is presented here. The bill of particulars alleges that the house was rented to Kinney.

Hazel v. Edwards

199 Okla. 169 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1947

Harrod, 189 Okla. 47 , 113 P. 2d 385 ; Routh v. Tonini, 193 Okla. 87 , 141 P. 2d 287 ; Harden v. Board of Education, 197 Okla. 598 , 173 P. 2d 429 . In Mires v. Hogan, supra, we said: “Under section 5238, Rev. … In Huddleston v.

Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Rogers

267 P.2d 572 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1954

Sykes, 169 Okl. 491 , 37 P.2d 908 ; Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Brown, 195 Okl. 345, 15 , 7 P.2d 184 . Heldj compensatory damages under the record herein, are not excessive. … Co. v.

Dunlap v. Jeffrey

260 P.2d 1072 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 7, 1953

Board v. Dill, 26 Okl. 104 , 110 P. 1107 , 29 L.R.A.,N.S., 1170; Turley v. Feebeck, 38 Okl. 257 , 132 P. 889 ; Amer. National Bank of Stigler v. Funk, 68 Okl. 169 , 172 P. 1078 , L.R.A.1918F, 1137. … Wilkins v. McGehee, 86 Ga. 764 , 13 S.E. 84 .

Killey v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

122 Okla. 102 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1926

Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a corporation, filed' its action in the district court of Muskogee county, against the defendants, constituting the excise board of Muskogee county, for injunctive relief as provided in … The questions presented here are identical with the questions presented in cause No. 17907, Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v.

Abraham v. McSoud

188 Okla. 409 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1941

Logan v. Brown, 20 Okla. 334 , 95 P. 2d 441 . It therefore becomes necessary to look at the petition to see whether the facts alleged were sufficient to take the contract out of the statute of frauds. … See Oliphant v. Rogers, 186 Okla. 70 , 95 P. 2d 887 ; Reed v. Peck & Hills Furniture Co., 93 Okla. 212 , 220 P. 900 .

Cline v. Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice

313 P.3d 253 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 2013

In Bonner v. … Comm'n v.

McKennon v. Pentecost

8 Okla. 117 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

Bank v. … (Tootle v. Brown, 4 Okla. 612 , 46 Pac. 550 ; United States Nat. Bank v. National Bank of Guthrie, 6 Okla. 163 , 51 Pac. 119 ; Penny v. Fellner, 6 Okla. 386 , 50 Pac. 123 ; Gillett v. Murphy, 7 Okla. 91, 54 Pac. 413 ;.

State Ex Rel. Barnett v. Exchange Nat. Bank

172 Okla. 361 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1935

In Shull, State Bank Com’r, et al. v. … Such was the holding in Multnomah County v. Oregon Nat. Bank, 61 Fed. 912 .” In Shull, Bank Com’r, et al. v.

H. J. Heinz Co. v. Wood

181 Okla. 389 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1937

Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Howser, 176 Okla. 445 , 56 P. (2d) 392 ; F. E. Northway v. Tryon, 163 Okla. 159 , 21 P. (2d) 591 , and other cases. … Continental Baking Co. v. Campbell, 176 Okla. 218 , 55 P. (2d) 114 ; Wilson & Co. v. Musgrave, 180 Okla. 246 , 68 P. (2d) 846 ; Pemberton Bakery v. State Industrial Commission. 180 Okla. 446 , 72 P. (2d) 98 ; Wallen v.

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 54 v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 67

2018 OK 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 2018

In Board of Commr's of Carter County v. Joint Sch. Dist. … ¶15 Finally, in the third case, Board of County Comm'rs v.

Lackey v. Quigley

181 Okla. 492 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1937

Each club had one member on the executive committee of the association which was the governing board thereof. … Lewis v. Schafer, 163 Okla. 94 , 20 P. (2d) 1048 .

Pine v. State Industrial Commission

107 Okla. 40 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1924

Co. v. Tunison, 55 N. J. L. … In the case of Richmond v.

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF DOWNING

489 P.3d 9 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 2021

Brown ex rel. Brown v. Okla. Secondary Sch. Activities Ass'n , 2005 OK 88, ¶ 11 , 125 P.3d 1219, 1225 (footnotes omitted). Entitlement to injunctive relief must be established by clear and convincing evidence. … ASS'N Discussed 2016 OK 112 , 384 P.3d 496 , BROWN v. ALLEY Discussed 2018 OK 21 , 415 P.3d 43 , BENEDETTI v. CIMAREX ENERGY COMPANY Discussed 2018 OK 91 , 434 P.3d 941 , CHRISTIAN v.

Walden v. Potts

97 Okla. 24 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 1924

Maudie Keenan, and Aggie Brown were daughters of Francis M. Potts, deceased: and that defendants Clarence M. Potts, Ernest Potts, Minnie M. Miller, Dora M. … '■ *27 In Shaffer v.

Abercrombie v. Edwards

62 Okla. 54 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1916

Jalie v. Cardinal, 35 Wis. 126 .” And in Churchill v. … Clute v. Wiggins, 14 Johns. (N. Y.) 175, 7 Am. Dec. 448 ; Norcross v. Norcross, 53 Me. 163 ; Bradner v. Mullen, 27 Misc. Rep. 479 , 59 N. Y. Supp. 178 ; Read v. Amidon, 41 Vt. 15 , 98 Am. Dec. 560 .

Horstman v. Bowermaster

90 Okla. 262 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 17, 1923

The case of Mathews v. … Brown v. Massey, 19 Okla. 482 , 92 Pac. 246 . The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. JOHNSON, C. J., and McNEILL, KEN-NAMER, I-IARRISON, and BRANSON, JJ., concur. r