Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

1.59s

  • Bryant v. Montgomery

    73 Okla. 104 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 23, 1918

    The defendants in error, as plaintiffs in the trial court, commenced this action to recover possession pf a portion of the surplus, allot- • ment of ííben Brown, a minor citizen of the Cherokee' Nation, and. for dámages for … Evidently the decision of Duff v. Keaton et al. was not called to the attention of the Commissioner writing the decision in Bailey v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Buel, Pryor & Daniel v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.

    65 Okla. 108 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1916

    Co. v. Bilby, 35 Okla. 589, 605 , 130 Pac. 1089 . … Herbert v. Wagg, 27 Okla. 674 , 117 Pac. 209 ; Hamilton v. Brown, 31 Okla. 213 , 120 Pac. 950 ; Coombs v. Cook, 35 Okla. 326 , 129 Pac. 698 , and cases cited.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Missouri, K. T.R. Co. v. State

    107 Okla. 23 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1923

    Co. v. Mottley, 219 U. S. 467 , 55 L. Ed. 297 , 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 671, 31 Sup. Ct. Rep. 265; Northern P. R. Co. v. Minnesota, 208 U. S. 583 , 52 L. Ed. 603 , 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 341; Manigault v. Springs, 199 U. … Board of Public Utilities, supra, Southern Kansas R. Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Wooten v. Hall

    442 P.2d 334 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 1968

    Board of Ed. of City of Okmulgee v. State Board of Ed., 201 Okl. 32 , 200 P.2d 394, 397 . So far as applicable here, subdiv. … Moody v. Childers, Okl., 344 P.2d 262 ; Midland Val. R. Co. v. Lowery, 207 Okl. 227 , 248 P.2d 1042 ; Johnson v. Short, 204 Okl. 656 , 232 P.2d 944, 948 ; Newell v. Musgrove, 129 Okl. 207 , 264 P. 156, 158 .

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Van Zant v. State Insurance Fund

    203 Okla. 421 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1950

    A. §§156, 157, 170, and chap. 10, §421; Englebert v. Verner, 218 Ala. 362 , 118 So. 745 , 62 A. L. R. 131; Robertson v. Labette County, 122 Kan. 486 , 252 P. 196 ; Iott v. … A. §1 et seq.; Board of Com’rs of Adair County v. Ragg, 194 Okla. 62 , 147 P. 2d 157 . Plaintiff’s petition and attached exhibits examined and held not to state a cause of action. Judgment affirmed.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Harris v. Allen

    78 Okla. 66 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1920

    McDaniel et al. v. Holland, 230 Fed. 945 , 145 C. C. A. 139 ; Jordan v. Jordan, 62 Oklahoma, 162 Pac. 758 ; Heffner v. Harmon, 60 Okla. 153 , 159 Pac. 650 ; Hart v. West, 62 Oklahoma, 161 Pac. 534 ; Hutchison v. … Brown, 66 Oklahoma, 167 Pac. 624 ; Tyrell v. Shaffer, 70 Oklahoma, 174 Pac. 1074 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cavin v. Kay & Kiowa Oil Co.

    139 Okla. 47 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1929

    Huttig Lead & Zinc Co. v. Brown, 90 Okla. 80 , 215 Pac. 1056 . Dr. Ralph V. … Associated Employers’ Reciprocal v. State Industrial Commission, 83 Okla. 73 , 200 Pac. 862 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In the Matter of Reinstatement of Jones

    203 P.3d 909 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 2009

    Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Samara, 683 P.2d 979, 983-984 . … V.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In re the Assessment of 1969 of Certain Property Owned by Crescent Precision Products, Inc.

    514 P.2d 933 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1973

    In the case of Shaw, State Auditor, v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 278 P. 311 , quoting from Lake County v. … Kerr, Governor, v. Grand River Dam Authority, 195 Okl. 8 , 154 P.2d 946 ; and Boswell v. State, 181 Okl. 435 , 74 P.2d 940 . With these rules in mind, we now examine § 6A.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Osage Oil & Ref. Co. v. Dickason-Goodman Lbr. Co.

    108 Okla. 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1924

    Hughes, 1 Brown (Pa.) 258; Martin v. Kilbourne (Tenn.) 12 Heisk, 331: Thomas v. Cole (Tenn.) 10 Heisk, 411. … Gordon (La.) 12 Martin, 378; Field v. Zalle, 5 Mo. App. 596 ; Fisse v. Einstein, 5 Mo. App. 78 ; Murray v. Bass (N. C.) 114 S. E. 303 ; Farrell v. Finch, 40 Ohio St. 337 ; Knapp v. Anderson, 71 N.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Gray

    181 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1937

    The' order of the administrative board was presented to us for review. Our decision was one of affirmance. Gray v. Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co., 165 Okla. 301 , 25 P. (2d) 761 . … Maryland Casualty Co. et al., v. Whitt, 167 Okla. 261 , 29 P. (2d) 65 ; Lott v. Continental Cas. Co. (Kan.) 284 P. 823 ; Robertson v. Board of Com’rs of of Iott Co. (Kan.) 252 P. 196 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Glenn v. McLeod

    199 Okla. 511 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1947

    Knox v. Krause, 140 Okla. 7 , 282 P. 120 ; Incorporated Town of Guymon v. Triplett, 71 Okla. 298 , 177 P. 570 ; Davis v. Lambard Hart Realty & Investment Co., 88 Okla. 301 , 213 P. 78 ; Brown v. … Marks, 45 Okla. 711 , 146 P. 707 ; Arkansas Fertilizer Co. v. Brattin, 127 Okla. 9 , 260 P. 43 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Smith

    55 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1916

    Great Western Coal & Coke Co. v. Serbantas, 50 Okla. 118 , 150 Pac. 1042 ; St. L. & S. F. R. R. Co. v. Brown, 45 Okla. 143 , 144 Pac. 1075 . … Co. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Woods v. Chicago, R. I. & Pac. Ry. Co.

    129 Okla. 91 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1928

    Westervelt v. Jones (Kan.) 52 Pac. 194 ; Hart v. Mills, 38 Tex. 513 ; Nations v. Johnson (U. S.) 24 How. 195 , 16 L. Ed. 628 ; State v. Canfield (Fla.) 23 South. 595 . … In re McPhee’s Estate (Cal) 97 Pac. 878 : Brown v. Powers (Iowa) 125 N. W. 833 ; Farwell v. Babcock (Tex. Civ. App.) 65 S. W. 509 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Colbert Mill & Feed Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

    188 Okla. 366 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1941

    The case of Kennedy v. State Board, 224 Iowa, 405 , 276 N. W. 205 , is in point. … State Tax Board of Georgia, 174 Ga. 816 , 164 S.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Shaw v. Calvary Baptist Church

    184 Okla. 454 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1939

    J. 330 and 344; La Mer v. Gill (N. J. 1936) 187 Atl. 730 ; Rosenberg v. Village of Whitefish Bay (Wis. 1929) 225 N. W. 838 ; Brown v. Grant (Tex. Civ. App. 1928) 2 S. W.2d 285 ; London v. Robinson (Cal. … The case of Nelson v. State (Wis. 1918) 167 N. W. 807 , cited by plaintiff, is not contrary to this rule.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Swan v. Duncan

    78 Okla. 305 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1920

    This claim was based upon the decision in Brown v. Wilson, 58 Oírla. 392, 160 Pac. 94 , which has since been overruled, and the point has been abandoned in this court. … Schock et al. v. Fish, 45 Okla. 12 , 144 Pac. 584 ; Crump v. Lanham, 67 Oklahoma, 168 Pac. 43 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Wood v. Speakman

    153 Okla. 180 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1931

    The majority decision is in conflict with the rule of law established in Rice v. Bontjes, 121 Okla. 292 , 250 P. 89 , and Littlefield v. … Long ago we adopted the rule existing in the state of Kansas as disclosed by the Littlefield-Brown Case.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Buhler v. Hysell

    37 Okla. 392 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1913

    In O’Keefe v. … And in the case of Finley v. Brown, 22 Iowa, 538 , it was held proper to take in evidence two tax deeds for the same land, one of which was executed to cure an informality of the other.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Anguish

    201 Okla. 691 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 19, 1949

    Barnsdall Oil Co. v. State Industrial Commission, 178 Okla. 289 , 62 P. 2d 1031 ; Texas Co. v. Atkinson, 178 Okla. 480 , 62 P. 2d 1204 ; White v. Shell Oil Co., 193 Okla. 374 , 143 P. 2d 825 . … Brown Brothers v. Parks et al., 176 Okla. 615 , 56 P. 2d 883 . Neither is there any such evidence that the alleged change of condition is attributable to the original injury. Williams Bros. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.