Case law

Cook v. Hammett

192 Okla. 298 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1943

J. 264-265; Cleveland et al. v. Bateman, 21 N. M. 675, 158 P. 648 ; Carico v. Kling, 11 Colo. A. 349, 53 P. 390 ; Savings & Loan Soc. v. Deering et al., 66 Cal. 281 , 5 P. 353 . … Taylor v. Lawrence, 176 Okla. 75 , 54 P. 2d 634 .

U.S. Bank, National Ass'n v. Moore

278 P.3d 596 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 2012

Fent v. Contingency Review Board, 2007 OK 27, ¶ 7 , 163 P.3d 512, 519-520 . Foremost, the party seeking relief must prove that they suffered an actual and concrete injury. … Fent v. Contingency Review Board, 2007 OK 27, ¶ 7 , 163 P.3d 512, 519-520 . In essence, a plaintiff who has not suffered an injury attributable to the defendant lacks standing to bring a suit.

Beville v. Curry

39 P.3d 754 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 2001

Russell v. Board of County Commissioners, Carter County, 1997 OK 80, ¶ 10 , 952 P.2d 492, 497 . … Brown Shoe Co. v.

Wooten v. Hall

442 P.2d 334 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 1968

Board of Ed. of City of Okmulgee v. State Board of Ed., 201 Okl. 32 , 200 P.2d 394, 397 . So far as applicable here, subdiv. … Moody v. Childers, Okl., 344 P.2d 262 ; Midland Val. R. Co. v. Lowery, 207 Okl. 227 , 248 P.2d 1042 ; Johnson v. Short, 204 Okl. 656 , 232 P.2d 944, 948 ; Newell v. Musgrove, 129 Okl. 207 , 264 P. 156, 158 .

State Ex Rel. R. J. Edwards, Inc. v. Keith

179 Okla. 563 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1937

Board of Com’rs of Harmon Co. v. R. J. Edwards, Inc., 140 Okla. 247 , 282 P. 1090 . … Board of Com’rs of Harmon Co. v. R. J. Edwards, Inc., supra. Section 6063, O. S. 1931, and section 4507, C. O.

Missouri, K. T.R. Co. v. State

107 Okla. 23 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1923

Co. v. Mottley, 219 U. S. 467 , 55 L. Ed. 297 , 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 671, 31 Sup. Ct. Rep. 265; Northern P. R. Co. v. Minnesota, 208 U. S. 583 , 52 L. Ed. 603 , 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 341; Manigault v. Springs, 199 U. … Board of Public Utilities, supra, Southern Kansas R. Co. v.

Bryant v. Montgomery

73 Okla. 104 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 23, 1918

The defendants in error, as plaintiffs in the trial court, commenced this action to recover possession pf a portion of the surplus, allot- • ment of ííben Brown, a minor citizen of the Cherokee' Nation, and. for dámages for … Evidently the decision of Duff v. Keaton et al. was not called to the attention of the Commissioner writing the decision in Bailey v.

Glenn v. McLeod

199 Okla. 511 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1947

Knox v. Krause, 140 Okla. 7 , 282 P. 120 ; Incorporated Town of Guymon v. Triplett, 71 Okla. 298 , 177 P. 570 ; Davis v. Lambard Hart Realty & Investment Co., 88 Okla. 301 , 213 P. 78 ; Brown v. … Marks, 45 Okla. 711 , 146 P. 707 ; Arkansas Fertilizer Co. v. Brattin, 127 Okla. 9 , 260 P. 43 .

Buel, Pryor & Daniel v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.

65 Okla. 108 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1916

Co. v. Bilby, 35 Okla. 589, 605 , 130 Pac. 1089 . … Herbert v. Wagg, 27 Okla. 674 , 117 Pac. 209 ; Hamilton v. Brown, 31 Okla. 213 , 120 Pac. 950 ; Coombs v. Cook, 35 Okla. 326 , 129 Pac. 698 , and cases cited.

Beal-Burrow Dry Goods Co. v. Baker

136 Okla. 278 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1929

Co. v. Rhodes, supra; Collier v. Davis, supra; and Nelson v. … It will thus be seen that the case, so far as the agreement -to release is con* *282 cerned, is squarely within the rule announced in Brown Shoe Co. v. Stone, supra.

In re the Assessment of 1969 of Certain Property Owned by Crescent Precision Products, Inc.

514 P.2d 933 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1973

In the case of Shaw, State Auditor, v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 278 P. 311 , quoting from Lake County v. … Kerr, Governor, v. Grand River Dam Authority, 195 Okl. 8 , 154 P.2d 946 ; and Boswell v. State, 181 Okl. 435 , 74 P.2d 940 . With these rules in mind, we now examine § 6A.

Van Zant v. State Insurance Fund

203 Okla. 421 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1950

A. §§156, 157, 170, and chap. 10, §421; Englebert v. Verner, 218 Ala. 362 , 118 So. 745 , 62 A. L. R. 131; Robertson v. Labette County, 122 Kan. 486 , 252 P. 196 ; Iott v. … A. §1 et seq.; Board of Com’rs of Adair County v. Ragg, 194 Okla. 62 , 147 P. 2d 157 . Plaintiff’s petition and attached exhibits examined and held not to state a cause of action. Judgment affirmed.

Harris v. Allen

78 Okla. 66 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1920

McDaniel et al. v. Holland, 230 Fed. 945 , 145 C. C. A. 139 ; Jordan v. Jordan, 62 Oklahoma, 162 Pac. 758 ; Heffner v. Harmon, 60 Okla. 153 , 159 Pac. 650 ; Hart v. West, 62 Oklahoma, 161 Pac. 534 ; Hutchison v. … Brown, 66 Oklahoma, 167 Pac. 624 ; Tyrell v. Shaffer, 70 Oklahoma, 174 Pac. 1074 .

Cavin v. Kay & Kiowa Oil Co.

139 Okla. 47 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1929

Huttig Lead & Zinc Co. v. Brown, 90 Okla. 80 , 215 Pac. 1056 . Dr. Ralph V. … Associated Employers’ Reciprocal v. State Industrial Commission, 83 Okla. 73 , 200 Pac. 862 .

In the Matter of Reinstatement of Jones

203 P.3d 909 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 2009

Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Samara, 683 P.2d 979, 983-984 . … V.

Vandervort v. Keen

184 Okla. 121 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 22, 1938

Keen, district judge of Custer county, to arrest proceedings in an injunction suit brought in that court by the State Board of Barber Examiners against petitioners pursuant to article 2. chapter 24, S. … The aforesaid statute is attacked as unconstitutional upon the same grounds as urged in the case of Herrin v. Arnold, 183 Okla. 392 , 82 P.2d 977 .

Colbert Mill & Feed Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

188 Okla. 366 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1941

The case of Kennedy v. State Board, 224 Iowa, 405 , 276 N. W. 205 , is in point. … State Tax Board of Georgia, 174 Ga. 816 , 164 S.

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Gray

181 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1937

The' order of the administrative board was presented to us for review. Our decision was one of affirmance. Gray v. Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co., 165 Okla. 301 , 25 P. (2d) 761 . … Maryland Casualty Co. et al., v. Whitt, 167 Okla. 261 , 29 P. (2d) 65 ; Lott v. Continental Cas. Co. (Kan.) 284 P. 823 ; Robertson v. Board of Com’rs of of Iott Co. (Kan.) 252 P. 196 .

Springfield v. Thompson

47 Okla. 565 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1915

Humphrey et al. v. Hunt, 9 Okla. 196 , 59 Pac. 971 ; Thompson et al. v. Fulton, 29 Okla. 700 , 119 Pac. 244 ; Kansas City, M. & O. R. Co. v. Williams, 33 Okla. 202 , 124 Pac. 63 ; May et al. v. … Bank v. Linotype Co., 31 Okla. 535 , 122 Pac. 507 . For the reason stated, the proceedings in error are dismissed. All the Justices concur, except BROWN, J., not participating.

Woods v. Chicago, R. I. & Pac. Ry. Co.

129 Okla. 91 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1928

Westervelt v. Jones (Kan.) 52 Pac. 194 ; Hart v. Mills, 38 Tex. 513 ; Nations v. Johnson (U. S.) 24 How. 195 , 16 L. Ed. 628 ; State v. Canfield (Fla.) 23 South. 595 . … In re McPhee’s Estate (Cal) 97 Pac. 878 : Brown v. Powers (Iowa) 125 N. W. 833 ; Farwell v. Babcock (Tex. Civ. App.) 65 S. W. 509 .