Case law

Anderson v. Guymon

51 Okla. 233 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1915

In Brown et al. v. First Nat. … In the body of the opinion, the court cites with approval the case of Barnard et al. v.

Wheeler v. City of Muskogee

51 Okla. 48 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1915

The plaintiff in error relies upon Davis et al. v. Board of County Commissioners, 45 Okla. 284 , 137 Pac. 114 , but in that case section 3052, Comp. … In the case of Butt v.

Patterson v. Wilson

203 Okla. 527 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 31, 1950

In Cantrell v. … In Burt v.

Johnson v. Steward

397 P.2d 907 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1964

In Tennant v. … It was held in Brown v.

White v. Buzan

130 Okla. 267 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 1, 1928

In Johnston v. … In Rogers v.

STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. Wilcox

227 P.3d 642 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 3, 2009

Respondent filed three lawsuits against the town of Seiling, the Seiling Board of Trustees (Board) members, and Matt Sander. … Bar Ass'n v.

Grier v. City of Tulsa

143 Okla. 244 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 1930

Co. v. … Ry. v.

Bonney v. City of Britton

202 Okla. 399 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1950

(See Bonney et al. v. Smith et al., 194 Okla. 106 , 147 P. 2d 771 .) … In Bonney et al. v.

Hampton v. Hamilton Const. Co.

173 Okla. 282 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1935

In the case of City of Shawnee v. … Hatfield v. Moreland. 152 Okla. 37 , 3 P. (2d) 803 .

Teague v. State Industrial Commission

112 Okla. 292 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1925

that neither the bottle-washers nor the delive/ry man was present at the scene of the accident is not material in determining whether more than one workman was employed. ’Petitioner contends, under Southwestern Grocery Co. v. … This contention is untenable under Brown v. Sinclair Refining Co., 86 Okla. 143 , 206 Pac. 1042 , and Merrick & Coe v. Modlin et al., 88 Okla. 83 , 211 Pac. 510 .

Sterling Refining Co. v. Walker

165 Okla. 45 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 16, 1933

Co. v. … Co. v.

FENT v. FALLIN

345 P.3d 1113 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 2, 2014

Perry County et al. v. Selma, etc., Railway Company, 58 Ala. 546 (1877). 5 . Jones, supra note 8 at 115; Atkinson v. Halliburton Co., 1995 OK 104, 117 , 905 P.2d 772 . 6 . SB 1246, Okla. Sess. … Austin, Nichols & Co. v. Oklahoma County Bd. of Tax Roll Corrections, see note 8, supra.

Eakin v. Chapman, County Treasurer

44 Okla. 51 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1914

This court held, in Wade, County Superintendent, v. Eakin et al., 31 Okla. 640 , 122 Pac. 176 ; Tilley v. … Treas., v. Linderman et al., 10 Okla. 570 , 64 Pac. 15 ; Ham v. Sawyer, 38 Me. 37 ; C., B. & Q. R. Co. v. City of Nebraska et al., 53 Neb. 453 , 73 N. W. 952 ; C., B. & Q. R. Co v. Cass County, 51 Neb. 369 , 70 N.

Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. Neal

81 Okla. 194 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1921

(Tolbert v. … in Lowe v.

McAlester Colliery Co. v. State Industrial Commission

85 Okla. 66 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 17, 1922

The same rule has been announced in ¡Board of Commissioners of Cleveland County v. Barr et al., 68 Oklahoma, 173 Pac. 206 ; Stephenson v. State Industrial Commission et al., 79 Okla. 228 , 192 Pac. 580 ; Raulerson v. … Mitchell, 81 Okla. 201 , 197 Pac. 171 ; Board of County Com’rs of Okmulgee County v. State ex rel. W. C. Jackson et al., 83 Okla. 48 , 201 Pac. 998 .

State Highway Department v. Powell

258 P.2d 1189 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 7, 1953

See Terminal Oil Mill Co. v. Younger, 188 Okl. 316 , 108 P.2d 542 , and Knotts Bakery v. Freudenthaler, 188 Okl. 321 , 108 P.2d 540 . Choctaw County v. … Brown, 202 Okl. 572 , 216 P.2d 294 , we are of the opinion and hold that there is competent evidence to sustain the finding that the death resulted from the accidental injury. Award sustained. HALLEY, C. J., JOHNSON, V.

Burlison v. Watson

137 Okla. 43 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1929

Schmueker v. Clifton, 62 Okla. 249 , 162 Pac. 1094 ; Reed v. Scott, 50 Okla. 757 , 151 Pac. 484 ; Cimpson v. Mauldin, 61 Okla. 92 , 160 Pas. 481; Amons v. Howard, 111 Okla. 195 , 239 Pac. 217 . … Corp. v. Freeman, 88 Okla. 166 , 212 Pac. 742 ; Helsel v. Fletcher, 98 Okla. 285 , 225 Pac. 514 ; Schulte v. Garrett, 99 Okla. 52 , 225 Pac. 904 .

Haynes v. Gaines

76 Okla. 268 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1919

On the 30th day of September, 1919. this court, upon the death of plaintiff, Wilburn Gaines, being suggested, entered an order reviving said cause in the names of Bettie Gaines, Marion Gaines, Herron Gaines, Lulu Brown, May … Wiseham v. Walter E.

Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Rogers

160 Okla. 164 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1932

In Barton v. Stuckey, Co. … In Barton v. Stuckey, Co.

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Long

122 Okla. 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1926

In Wonacott v. … In Hoskins v. Baxter, 66 N.